IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/ppaper/pb07-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brazil Agriculture—Response and resilience of food security under dual shocks in 2020: Oil price collapse and the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Tsakok
  • Fatima Ezzahra Mengoub

Abstract

Brazil, an oil-exporting nation, was still struggling to recover from the depression which started around 2014/15 when it was hit by a quick succession of shocks: the COVID-19 pandemic and the oil price collapse. The global pandemic triggered major economic dislocations and contractions in foreign and domestic markets, which further exacerbated the fall in demand for oil, sending world prices tumbling further. Poverty was already widespread in Brazil pre-pandemic. And despite recent progress, inequality is high, one of the highest in the world. So when disaster struck in early 2020, it was unsurprising that millions, especially in the two lower quintiles, suffered greater food insecurity while the upper quintile was barely hurt. The negative impact was also very uneven regionally: the poorer Northeast, the North and Center West suffered 8%-10% of income loss while the richer regions of the South and Southeast were least affected, with an income loss of 6%-7%. Fortunately, the difficult recession and pandemic period was preceded by a decade or so—2002-14—of GDP growth and reduced income inequality. During this ‘Golden Period’, Brazil made substantial progress on reducing poverty and strengthening major programs of social transfers, in particular the Bolsa Escola and the Bolsa Familia programs, which invested in the human capital of poor children and young people. When the dual shocks struck in early 2020, these programs were scaled up to mitigate the adverse impact of increased unemployment and income loss. In addition to these social transfers to the poor and vulnerable, Brazil has other sources of resilience. First, Brazil has a relatively large formal-sector workforce, which can draw on unemployment insurance and personal savings. Second, it has near-universal access to pensions and/or social security for the older population which is more vulnerable to COVID-19. Third, it has developed a robust institutional infrastructure for the delivery of emergency measures, notably its beneficiary registry, the Cadastro Unico, which has enabled the government to expand social transfers and emergency aid to the poor, who are mainly those working in the informal sector with unprotected jobs. Brazil’s resilience largely rests on three institutional pillars: (i) unemployment insurance for formal labor, the bulk of the workforce; (ii) pensions for the older population; and (iii) the Cadastro Unico for the poor who typically succeed in having only informal jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Tsakok & Fatima Ezzahra Mengoub, 2021. "Brazil Agriculture—Response and resilience of food security under dual shocks in 2020: Oil price collapse and the COVID-19 pandemic," Policy notes & Policy briefs 1936, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:ppaper:pb07-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/PB_07-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Editorial, 2020. "Covid-19 and Climate Change," Journal, Review of Agrarian Studies, vol. 10(1), pages 5-6, January-J.
    2. World Bank, 2009. "Mexico - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9478, The World Bank Group.
    3. World Bank, 2009. "Ecuador - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9473, The World Bank Group.
    4. World Bank, 2009. "Paraguay - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9482, The World Bank Group.
    5. World Bank, 2009. "Chile - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9469, The World Bank Group.
    6. World Bank, 2009. "Costa Rica - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9471, The World Bank Group.
    7. World Bank, 2009. "Peru - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9481, The World Bank Group.
    8. World Bank, 2009. "Brazil - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9468, The World Bank Group.
    9. World Bank, 2001. "Brazil : Assessment of the Bolsa Escola Programs," World Bank Publications - Reports 15705, The World Bank Group.
    10. World Bank, 2009. "Panama - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9480, The World Bank Group.
    11. World Bank, 2009. "Haiti - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9476, The World Bank Group.
    12. World Bank, 2009. "Nicaragua - Country Note on Climate Change Aspects in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 9479, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2013. "Accessing International Climate Change Related Finance in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank Publications - Reports 16073, The World Bank Group.
    2. Laura Lengnick, 2015. "The vulnerability of the US food system to climate change," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 348-361, September.
    3. Patricio Valdivieso & Pablo Neudorfer & Krister P. Andersson, 2021. "Causes and Consequences of Local Government Efforts to Reduce Risk and Adapt to Extreme Weather Events: Municipal Organizational Robustness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-43, July.
    4. Andrea Baranzini & Stefano Carattini & Linda Tesauro, 2021. "Designing Effective and Acceptable Road Pricing Schemes: Evidence from the Geneva Congestion Charge," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 417-482, July.
    5. Robert J. R. Elliott & Ingmar Schumacher & Cees Withagen, 2020. "Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1187-1213, August.
    6. Patrycja Klusak & Matthew Agarwala & Matt Burke & Moritz Kraemer & Kamiar Mohaddes, 2023. "Rising Temperatures, Falling Ratings: The Effect of Climate Change on Sovereign Creditworthiness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7468-7491, December.
    7. Francine Mestrum, 2020. "Universal Social Protection and Health Care as a Social Common," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 63(2), pages 238-243, December.
    8. David Klenert & Franziska Funke & Linus Mattauch & Brian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Five Lessons from COVID-19 for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 751-778, August.
    9. Susan Aaronson, 2021. "Can Trade Agreements Solve the Wicked Problem of Disinformation," Working Papers 2021-12, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    10. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "The third finding concerning a missing cultural value: a bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science," OSF Preprints jbcx3, Center for Open Science.
    11. Zeynep Clulow & Michele Ferguson & Peta Ashworth & David Reiner, 2021. "Political ideology and public views of the energy transition in Australia and the UK," Working Papers EPRG2106, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    12. Nestor Goicoechea & Luis María Abadie, 2021. "Optimal Slow Steaming Speed for Container Ships under the EU Emission Trading System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Timothy J. Garrett & Matheus R. Grasselli & Stephen Keen, 2020. "Past production constrains current energy demands: persistent scaling in global energy consumption and implications for climate change mitigation," Papers 2006.03718, arXiv.org.
    14. Luo, Shihua & Hu, Weihao & Liu, Wen & Liu, Zhou & Huang, Qi & Chen, Zhe, 2022. "Flexibility enhancement measures under the COVID-19 pandemic – A preliminary comparative analysis in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sichuan of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    15. Agarwala, Matthew & Burke, Matt & Klusak, Patrycja & Mohaddes, Kamiar & Volz, Ulrich & Zenghelis, Dimitri, 2021. "Climate Change And Fiscal Sustainability: Risks And Opportunities," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 258, pages 28-46, November.
    16. François Bourguignon & Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Phillippe Leite, 2003. "Conditional cash transfers, schoolingand child labor: micro-simulating bolsa escola," Textos para discussão 477, Department of Economics PUC-Rio (Brazil).
    17. Zhu Liu & Zhu Deng & Philippe Ciais & Jianguang Tan & Biqing Zhu & Steven J. Davis & Robbie Andrew & Olivier Boucher & Simon Ben Arous & Pep Canadel & Xinyu Dou & Pierre Friedlingstein & Pierre Gentin, 2021. "Global Daily CO$_2$ emissions for the year 2020," Papers 2103.02526, arXiv.org.
    18. Marco Manacorda & Furio Camillo Rosati, 2011. "Industrial Structure and Child Labor Evidence from the Brazilian Population Census," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(4), pages 753-776.
    19. Lawal, Olanrewaju & Emeka, Anyiam, 2021. "Spatial Structure And Climatic Associations With Covid-19 Cases Across The Globe," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 9(2), pages 75-90.
    20. Chaofeng Tang & Kentaka Aruga, 2021. "Effects of the 2008 Financial Crisis and COVID-19 Pandemic on the Dynamic Relationship between the Chinese and International Fossil Fuel Markets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:ppaper:pb07-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.