IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nip/nipewp/10-2018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Organizational Capacity model for wine cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Maria de Fátima Souza

    (Federal University of Tocantins and NIPE)

  • Ana Carvalho

    (University of Minho and NIPE)

Abstract

We propose a model of Organizational Capacity for wine cooperatives. Cooperatives are organizations with distinct characteristics, in particular, they have a dual nature: they are simultaneously a business and non-profit driven organizations owned by their members. This poses specific challenges to cooperative management. Organizational Capacity is a construct developed for nonprofit organizations, but it has not been applied to cooperatives. Based on a qualitative study with 19 wine cooperatives in Portugal, we developed an organizational capacity model that accounts for the social and the economic dimensions of cooperatives and the peculiarities of their identity. The model comprises seven interdependent capacity elements: infrastructure, financial, strategic planning, marketing, human resources, relationship with members, and management capacity. We explore each of these capacities and how they relate to each other, highlighting their specific relevance in cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria de Fátima Souza & Ana Carvalho, 2018. "An Organizational Capacity model for wine cooperatives," NIPE Working Papers 10/2018, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    • Handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:10/2018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nipe.eeg.uminho.pt/Uploads/WP_2018/NIPE_WP_10_2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nilsson, Jerker & Kihlen, Anna & Norell, Lennart, 2009. "Are Traditional Cooperatives an Endangered species? About Shrinking Satisfaction, Involvement and Trust," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Nilsson, Jerker, 2001. "Organisational principles for co-operative firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 329-356, September.
    3. Bhuyan, Sanjib & Leistritz, F. Larry, 2001. "An Examination of Characteristics and Determinants of Success of Cooperatives in the Non-Agricultural Sectors," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 16, pages 1-17.
    4. Mooney, Patrick & Gray, Thomas W., 2002. "Cooperative Conversion and Restructuring in Theory and Practice," Research Reports 280024, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    5. Eric Giraud-Héraud & Claire Chambolle, 2003. "Certification de la qualité par une AOC : un modèle d’analyse," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 159(3), pages 83-91.
    6. Jerker NILSSON, 1996. "The Nature Of Cooperative Values And Principles," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(4), pages 633-653, December.
    7. Farhad Analoui & Akram Samour, 2012. "Strategic management: the case of NGOs in Palestine," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(6), pages 473-489, May.
    8. Rafat A. M. E. Soboh & Alfons Oude Lansink & Gerard Giesen & Gert van Dijk, 2009. "Performance Measurement of the Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives: The Gap between Theory and Practice," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 446-469.
    9. Bijman, W.J.J. & Hendrikse, G.W.J. & van Oijen, A.A.C.J., 2012. "Accommodating Two Worlds in One Organization: Changing Board Models in Agricultural Cooperatives," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2012-015-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Hakelius & Jerker Nilsson, 2020. "The Logic behind the Internal Governance of Sweden’s Largest Agricultural Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Nilsson, Jerker & Helgesson, Matilda & Rommel, Jens & Svensson, Ellinor, 2020. "Forest-owner support for their cooperative's provision of public goods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Justine Valette & Paul Amadieu & Patrick Sentis, 2018. "Les coopératives résistent-elles mieux ? Une analyse de survie des coopératives agricoles françaises," Post-Print hal-01990418, HAL.
    4. Natalia P. MONTEIRO & Odd Rune STRAUME, 2018. "Are Cooperatives More Productive Than Investor-Owned Firms? Cross-Industry Evidence From Portugal," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(2), pages 377-414, June.
    5. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    6. Yung-Chang WANG, 2017. "A conjectural variation approach to vertical integration in agricultural cooperatives," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 228-233.
    7. Viergutz, Tim & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2016. "The Spatiotemporal Interrelatedness of Farmers’ Switching Decisions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235882, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Hakelius, Karin & Hansson, Helena, 2016. "Members’ attitudes towards cooperatives and their perception of agency problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), October.
    9. Höhler Julia, 2017. "Heterogenität von Mitgliederstrukturen als Herausforderung für Genossenschaften im Agribusiness," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 21-35, March.
    10. Michael Kopel & Marco Marini, 2014. "Strategic delegation in consumer cooperatives under mixed oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 275-296, November.
    11. Inocencia María Martinez-Leon & Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes & MCarmen Martínez-Victoria & Narciso Arcas-Lario, 2020. "Leadership Style and Gender: A Study of Spanish Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Iiro Jussila & Sanjay Goel & Pasi Tuominen, 2012. "Governance of Co-operative Organizations: A Social Exchange Perspective," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(2), pages 14-25, June.
    13. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael Lee, 2021. "Members of cooperatives: more heterogeneous, less satisfied?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(5), April.
    14. Lind, Lena W., 2011. "The Demutualization of a Cooperative - Swedish Meats," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114382, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    16. Gray, Thomas W., 2009. "Selecting a Cooperative Membership Structure for the Agriculture-of-the- Middle Initiative," Research Reports 280104, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    17. Damien Rousselière, 2019. "A Flexible Approach to Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Comparing the Life Duration for Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Enterprises Using a Bayesian Generalized Additive Discrete Time Survi," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(4), pages 829-855, December.
    18. Maryline Filippi, 2014. "Using the Regional Advantage: French Agricultural Cooperatives' Economic and Governance Tool," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 597-615, December.
    19. Holstenkamp, Lars & Degenhart, Heinrich, 2013. "Bürgerbeteiligungsmodelle für erneuerbare Energien - Eine Begriffsbestimmung aus finanzwirtschaftlicher Perspektive [Citizen Participation Schemes for Renewable Energies - A Definition from a Finan," MPRA Paper 81263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Valérie Barraud-Didier & Marie-Christine Henninger & Pierre Triboulet, 2014. "La Participation des Adhérents Dans Leurs Coopératives Agricoles: Une Étude Exploratoire du Secteur Céréalier Français," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(1), pages 125-148, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational capacity; cooperatives; wine cooperatives; PortugaL;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:10/2018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NIPE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nipampt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.