IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33917.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nicotine Vaping and Youth Mental Health: New Evidence from E-Cigarette Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Chad D. Cotti
  • Tessie Krishna
  • Johanna Catherine Maclean
  • Erik T. Nesson
  • Joseph J. Sabia

Abstract

The confluence of a youth mental health crisis and high rates of teenage nicotine vaping has led some U.S. tobacco control advocates to argue that reducing access to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) — through policies such as ENDS taxation — may improve youth and young adult mental health. Using data from several nationally representative surveys (Youth Risk Behavior Survey, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health) and a generalized difference-in-differences approach, we find no evidence that ENDS taxation improves youth and young adult mental health. With 95 percent confidence, we can rule out that the mean state ENDS tax increase adopted during our analysis sample ($0.34 per mL of e-liquid in 2023$) reduces persistent depressive symptoms among youths by more than 0.3 percent and suicide ideation by more than 1.0 percent. Moreover, discrete-time hazard models provide little evidence that ENDS taxes affect dynamics in youth mental health. A similar pattern of results emerges when we examine a wider set of ENDS regulations, including minimum legal purchasing ages, e-cigarette licensure laws, online sales restrictions, and restrictions on indoor nicotine vaping.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad D. Cotti & Tessie Krishna & Johanna Catherine Maclean & Erik T. Nesson & Joseph J. Sabia, 2025. "Nicotine Vaping and Youth Mental Health: New Evidence from E-Cigarette Regulations," NBER Working Papers 33917, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33917
    Note: AG CH EH LE PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33917.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.