How Do Surrogates Make Treatment Decisions for Patients with Dementia? An Experimental Survey Study
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Note: AG EH
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:5:p:535-546 is not listed on IDEAS
- Schild, Christoph & Heck, Daniel W. & Ścigała, Karolina A. & Zettler, Ingo, 2019. "Revisiting REVISE: (Re)Testing unique and combined effects of REminding, VIsibility, and SElf-engagement manipulations on cheating behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Sorravich Kingsuwankul & Chloe Tergiman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2023.
"Why do oaths work? Image concerns and credibility in promise keeping,"
Working Papers
hal-04209489, HAL.
- Sorravich Kingsuwankul & Chloe Tergiman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2023. "Why do oaths work? Image concerns and credibility in promise keeping," Working Papers 2316, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Luka Koning & Marianne Junger & Joris Hoof, 2020. "Digital signatures: a tool to prevent and predict dishonesty?," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 19(2), pages 257-285, November.
- Cagala, Tobias & Glogowsky, Ulrich & Rincke, Johannes & Schudy, Simeon, 2024.
"Commitment requests do not affect truth-telling in laboratory and online experiments,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 179-190.
- Tobias Cagala & Ulrich Glogowsky & Johannes Rincke & Simeon Schudy, 2023. "Commitment Requests Do Not Affect Truth-Telling in Laboratory and Online Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 466, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Ayal, Shahar & Celse, Jérémy & Hochman, Guy, 2021. "Crafting messages to fight dishonesty: A field investigation of the effects of social norms and watching eye cues on fare evasion," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 9-19.
- Lilleholt, Lau & Schild, Christoph & Zettler, Ingo, 2020. "Not all computerized cheating tasks are equal: A comparison of computerized and non-computerized versions of a cheating task," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
- Prochazka, Jakub & Fedoseeva, Yulia & Houdek, Petr, 2021. "A field experiment on dishonesty: A registered replication of Azar et al. (2013)," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
More about this item
JEL classification:
- C99 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Other
- I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
- J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-AGE-2024-03-04 (Economics of Ageing)
- NEP-EXP-2024-03-04 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HEA-2024-03-04 (Health Economics)
- NEP-NEU-2024-03-04 (Neuroeconomics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.