IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mhe/chemon/2024-13.html

Services and Cash: How Long-term Care Insurance Benefit Design Affects Household Behavior in China

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Guo

    (Hunan University)

  • Yang Li

    (University of Nottingham Ningbo China)

  • Minghao Wu

    (China Life Insurance Company Ltd.)

  • Terence C. Cheng

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health & Monash University)

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of China’s long-term care insurance (LTCI) benefit design on household consumption and intergenerational support. The program provides two benefit options: in-kind benefits (or services) and cash allowances. We introduce a conceptual framework to analyze economic decision making under the two types of LTCI benefits. Using an empirical framework that exploits variations in LTCI benefit designs across China’s pilot cities, we find that both types of LTCI benefits increase household consumption and reduce medical expenditure. Specifically, ‘mixed’ benefits households – those with a choice between in-kind and cash benefits – significantly increase spending on food and housing, while households receiving services spend more on housing, transport, and clothing. Additionally, in-kind benefit recipients report receiving lower informal care from their children, implying a substitution with formal care. Households with mixed benefits experience a decline in financial support from children, suggesting a crowding-out of intergenerational transfers. Finally, we estimate income and sub-stitution effects that are implicit in recipients’ behavior to analyze welfare implications under China’s LTCI.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Guo & Yang Li & Minghao Wu & Terence C. Cheng, 2024. "Services and Cash: How Long-term Care Insurance Benefit Design Affects Household Behavior in China," Papers 2024-13, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
  • Handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2024-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://monash-ch-econ-wps.s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/RePEc/mhe/chemon/2024-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    2. Courbage, Christophe & Eeckhoudt, Louis, 2012. "On insuring and caring for parents’ long-term care needs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 842-850.
    3. Costa-Font, Joan & Jimenez-Martin, Sergi & Vilaplana, Cristina, 2018. "Does long-term care subsidization reduce hospital admissions and utilization?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 43-66.
    4. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    5. Christophe Courbage & Guillem Montoliu-Montes & Joël Wagner, 2020. "The effect of long-term care public benefits and insurance on informal care from outside the household: empirical evidence from Italy and Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(8), pages 1131-1147, November.
    6. Costa-Font, Joan & Jiménez-Martín, Sergi & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2022. "Do Public Caregiving Subsidies and Supports affect the Provision of Care and Transfers?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Wang, Qun & Abiiro, Gilbert Abotisem & Yang, Jin & Li, Peng & De Allegri, Manuela, 2021. "Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    8. Iwamoto, Yasushi & Kohara, Miki & Saito, Makoto, 2010. "On the consumption insurance effects of long-term care insurance in Japan: Evidence from micro-level household data," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 99-115, March.
    9. Feng, Jin & Wang, Zhen & Yu, Yangyang, 2020. "Does long-term care insurance reduce hospital utilization and medical expenditures? Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    10. Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant & Lim, Wilfredo, 2015. "Long-term care insurance, informal care, and medical expenditures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 128-142.
    11. Fu, Rong & Noguchi, Haruko & Kawamura, Akira & Takahashi, Hideto & Tamiya, Nanako, 2017. "Spillover effect of Japanese long-term care insurance as an employment promotion policy for family caregivers," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 103-112.
    12. Liu, Hong & Ma, Jinqiu & Zhao, Liqiu, 2023. "Public long-term care insurance and consumption of elderly households: Evidence from China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Asako Ohinata & Matteo Picchio, 2020. "Financial support for long-term elderly care and household saving behaviour," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(1), pages 247-268.
    14. Lei, Xiaoyan & Bai, Chen & Hong, Jingpeng & Liu, Hong, 2022. "Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    15. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Miao & Li, Yang & Zhang, Wendan, 2025. "Supply expansion of Long-Term Services & Supports: Evidence from China’s long-term care insurance pilot," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Liu, Hong & Ma, Jinqiu & Zhao, Liqiu, 2023. "Public long-term care insurance and consumption of elderly households: Evidence from China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Lin, Lin & He, Min & Sun, Wenkai, 2025. "Security fosters generosity: Social security protection and charitable giving," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    4. Jiayi Wen & Xiaoqing Yu, 2024. "Insuring Long-Term Care in Developing Countries: The Interaction between Formal and Informal Insurance," Papers 2408.14243, arXiv.org.
    5. Ai, Jingyi & Feng, Jin & Zhang, Xiaohan, 2024. "Long-term care insurance coverage and labor force participation of older people: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Costa-Font, Joan & Jiménez-Martín, Sergi & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2022. "Do Public Caregiving Subsidies and Supports affect the Provision of Care and Transfers?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Lin, Lin & He, Min & Nie, Peng, 2025. "Direct and spillover effects of long-term care insurance on Chinese elderly frailty," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    8. Tianli Yang & Zhong Zhao, 2025. "Public Long‐Term Care Insurance and Retirement Intentions of Urban Workers: Evidence From China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(9), pages 1537-1559, September.
    9. Fu, Liping & Wang, Ruizhen & He, Chaoying, 2025. "Gender differences in later life: Labor supply responses to spousal disability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    10. Han, Xiao & Liu, Zining & Zheng, Wei, 2025. "Does public long-term care insurance affect spousal labor supply? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Yang, Tianli & Zhao, Zhong, 2025. "Long-term care insurance policy and the development of elderly care enterprises in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    12. Hollingsworth, Bruce & Ohinata, Asako & Picchio, Matteo & Walker, Ian, 2022. "Does It Matter Who Cares for You? The Effect of Substituting Informal with Formal Personal Care on the Care Recipients' Health," IZA Discussion Papers 15457, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Lin, Lin & He, Min & Zai, Xianhua, 2025. "Evaluating the impact of long-term care insurance reform on health-related quality of life and inequality among older adults in China: A quasi-experimental analysis," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Shao, Zhanqiang & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Impact of long-term care insurance on the financial asset allocation of middle-aged and elderly households: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    15. Chengxu Long & Wei Yang & Karen Glaser, 2025. "Can long-term care insurance reduce catastrophic health and long-term care expenditures among older adults? A quasi-experimental study in China," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Luo, Yanan & Yuan, Kexin & Li, Yuxiao & Liu, Yating & Pan, Yao, 2024. "The “spillover effect” of long-term care insurance in China on spouses’ health and well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    17. Hao, Zhuang & Bian, Renxin & Wang, Yuze, 2025. "The impact of health insurance on informal care: Evidence from China's urban-rural basic health insurance consolidation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PA).
    18. Bas Scheer & Wiljan van den Berge & Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2022. "Alternative Work Arrangements and Worker Outcomes: Evidence from Payrolling," CPB Discussion Paper 435, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    20. Alex Hollingsworth & Krzysztof Karbownik & Melissa A. Thomasson & Anthony Wray, 2024. "The Gift of a Lifetime: The Hospital, Modern Medicine, and Mortality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 2201-2238, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhe:chemon:2024-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Johannes Kunz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.