IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mad/wpaper/2026-296.html

Women Director Networks and Corporate Social Responsibility of Indian firms

Author

Listed:
  • Kavitha Nambiar

    (Ph.D Student, Madras School of Economics)

  • Ekta Selarka

    ((Corresponding author), Madras School of Economics, Gandhi Mandapam Road, Behind Government Data Centre, Kotturpuram, Chennai, 600025)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between network centrality of women directors in Indian boards on their corporate social responsibility (CSR). While existing research primarily focuses on board gender diversity, we argue that the ability of women directors to affect firm decisions also depends on how well connected these directors are. Using the enforcement of mandatory CSR as a natural experiment on a sample of non-financial firms listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) in India during 2016-2023 we find that firms with higher women directors centrality exhibit higher CSR spending, stronger compliance with the CSR mandate and a greater likelihood of spending above their industry peers. The effects were stronger among firms that engage in CSR consistently and was also robust across alternative measures of network centrality and alternative specifications to address the endogeneity. Our findings contributed to the literature on gender diversity and CSR, by indicating that the network centrality constitute an important mechanism through which women directors influence CSR outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kavitha Nambiar & Ekta Selarka, 2026. "Women Director Networks and Corporate Social Responsibility of Indian firms," Working Papers 2026-296, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    • Handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2026-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mse.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Working-paper-296.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richardson, Grant & Lanis, Roman, 2007. "Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 689-704.
    2. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    3. Marisetty, Vijaya Bhaskar & Prasad, Salu, 2022. "On the side effects of mandatory gender diversity laws in corporate boards," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Jayati Sarkar & Subrata Sarkar, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility in India—An Effort to Bridge the Welfare Gap," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 7(1), pages 1-36, April.
    5. Kathyayini Rao & Carol Tilt, 2016. "Board diversity and CSR reporting: an Australian study," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 182-210, June.
    6. Biswas, Shreya & Sarkar, Jayati & Selarka, Ekta, 2025. "Women director interlocks and firm performance: Evidence from India," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Amin, Abu & Chourou, Lamia & Kamal, Syed & Malik, Mahfuja & Zhao, Yang, 2020. "It’s who you know that counts: Board connectedness and CSR performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    9. Bryan W. Husted & José De Jesus Salazar, 2006. "Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 75-91, January.
    10. Jayati Sarkar & Subrata Sarkar, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility in India - An Effort to bridge the welfare gap," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2015-023, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    11. Sam Ronald & Suwandi Ng & Fransiskus Eduardus Daromes, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility as Economic Mechanism for Creating Firm Value," Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(1), pages 22-36.
    12. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    13. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    14. Ahmad, Muhammad Ishfaq & Battisti, Enrico & Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Damilano, Marina, 2025. "Corporate philanthropy and corporate governance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rania Beji & Ouidad Yousfi & Nadia Loukil & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 133-155, September.
    2. Sudershan Kuntluru, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Indian Evidence," Working papers 332, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    3. Yaseen AlJanadi, 2026. "Gender diversity and disclosure: a meta-analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 197-211, March.
    4. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    5. Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah & Saeed Akbar & Xiaoyun Zhu, 2025. "Mandatory CSR disclosure, institutional ownership and firm value: Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 71-85, January.
    6. Arian, Adam & Bose, Sudipta & Karoui, Lotfi & Shams, Syed, 2025. "From crisis to Stability: How CSR shielded firms during Covid-19 pandemic," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Sudershan Kuntluru, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Indian Evidence," Working papers 317, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    8. Luigi Lepore & Loris Landriani & Sabrina Pisano & Gabriella D’Amore & Stefano Pozzoli, 2023. "Corporate governance in the digital age: the role of social media and board independence in CSR disclosure. Evidence from Italian listed companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 749-785, September.
    9. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei & Mishra, Dev R. & Somé, Hyacinthe Y., 2025. "Firm-level climate sentiments, climate politics and implied cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Lutfa Tilat Ferdous & Tarek Rana & Richard Yeboah, 2025. "Decoding the impact of firm‐level ESG performance on financial disclosure quality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 162-186, January.
    11. Khurshid Djalilov & Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "The spirit is willing, but the institutions are weak: disclosure of corporate social responsibility and the financial sector in transition," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(2), pages 385-427, June.
    12. Atif Ikram & Zhichuan (Frank) Li & Travis MacDonald, 2020. "CEO Pay Sensitivity (Delta and Vega) and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Jing Jia & Zhongtian Li, 2022. "Corporate Environmental Performance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 188-200, June.
    14. Hui Li & Ting Sun & Jinquan Zhang, 2024. "Prediction of corporate financial distress based on corporate social responsibility: New evidence from DANP, VWP and MEOWA weights methodologies," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(5), pages 4537-4565, December.
    15. Abhijith G. Acharya & David Gras & Ryan Krause, 2022. "Socially Oriented Shareholder Activism Targets: Explaining Activists’ Corporate Target Selection Using Corporate Opportunity Structures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 307-323, June.
    16. Boubaker, Sabri & Chebbi, Kaouther & Grira, Jocelyn, 2020. "Top management inside debt and corporate social responsibility? Evidence from the US," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 98-115.
    17. Martin Jacob & Anna Rohlfing-Bastian & Kai Sandner, 2021. "Why do not all firms engage in tax avoidance?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 459-495, February.
    18. Surroca Aguilar, Jorge & Tribo Gine, José Antonio, 2009. "Is managerial entrenchment always bad? : a CSR approach," IC3JM - Estudios = Working Papers id-09-01, Instituto Mixto Carlos III - Juan March de Ciencias Sociales (IC3JM).
    19. Wang, Zhiwen, 2025. "The impact of common ownership between banks and firms on corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Chieh-Jung Chan & Ping-Fang Yen & Hsin-Wen Wang & Yuan Chang, 2026. "ESG Performance and Bank Loan Interest Rates," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2026-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geetha G (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mseacin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.