An empirical examination of repeated auctions for biodiversity conservation contracts
The European Union’s Council Regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development has introduced auctioning as a new instrument for granting agri-environmental payments and awarding conservation contracts for the recent multi-annual budgetary plan. This paper therefore deals with the conception and results of two case study auctions for conservation contracts. Results of two field experiments show much differentiated bid prices in the model-region and budgetary cost-effectiveness gains of up to 21% in the first auction and up to 36% in the repeated auction. Besides these promising results, some critical aspects as well as lessons to be learned will also be discussed in this paper to improve the design and performance of upcoming conservation auctions.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Joachim Wagner & Lena Koller & Claus Schnabel, 2008.
"Sind mittelständische Betriebe der Jobmotor der deutschen Wirtschaft?,"
Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 88(2), pages 130-135, February.
- Joachim Wagner & Lena Koller & Claus Schnabel, 2007. "Sind mittelständische Betriebe der Jobmotor der deutschen Wirtschaft?," Working Paper Series in Economics 71, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
- Wagner, Joachim & Koller, Lena & Schnabel, Claus, 2007. "Sind mittelständische Betriebe der Jobmotor der deutschen Wirtschaft?," Discussion Papers 54, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
- Martin F. Quaas & Stefan Baumgärtner, 2006.
"The Private and Public Insurance Value of Conservative Biodiversity Management,"
Working Paper Series in Economics
33, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
- Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin, 2005. "The private and public insurance value of conservative biodiversity management," UFZ Discussion Papers 27/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lue:wpaper:78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Wagner)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.