IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/luc/wpaper/20-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Geographical Stratification of Green Urban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre M. Picard

    (Department of Economics and Management, Université du Luxembourg)

  • Thi Thu Huyen TRAN

    (Department of Finance, Université du Luxembourg)

Abstract

This paper studies the provision of urban green areas in cities when residents have preferences for the size of and access to those areas. At the optimum, the number of urban green spaces is a non-monotone function of distance to the city centre, while the sizes and distances to other urban green areas increase as one moves to the urban fringe. This paper empirically investigates those properties for the 300 largest European cities by using the GMES Urban Atlas database (European Environmental Agency). The empirical analysis confirms the non-monotone relationship between the number of urban green spaces and the distance to the city centre. The distance between two parks also increases as one moves toward the urban fringe. Finally, richer cities are associated with a denser network of urban green areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre M. Picard & Thi Thu Huyen TRAN, 2020. "Geographical Stratification of Green Urban Areas," DEM Discussion Paper Series 20-06, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:20-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wwwen-archive.uni.lu/downloads/2020-06GeographicalStratificationofGreenUrbanAreas-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    2. Picard, Pierre M. & Tabuchi, Takatoshi, 2013. "On microfoundations of the city," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2561-2582.
    3. Brueckner, Jan K. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois & Zenou, Yves, 1999. "Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?: An amenity-based theory," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 91-107, January.
    4. Walsh, Randy, 2007. "Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 319-344, March.
    5. CREMER, Helmuth & de KERCHOVE, Anne-Marie & THISSE, Jacques-François, 1985. "An econometric theory of public facilities in space," LIDAM Reprints CORE 646, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Turner, Matthew A., 2005. "Landscape preferences and patterns of residential development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 19-54, January.
    7. Cremer, Helmuth & De Kerchove, Anne-Marie & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1985. "An economic theory of public facilities in space," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 249-262, June.
    8. Rappaport, Jordan, 2007. "Moving to nice weather," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 375-398, May.
    9. Wu, JunJie & Plantinga, Andrew J., 2003. "The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 288-309, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre M. Picard & Thi Thu Huyen Tran, 2019. "Green Urban Areas," DEM Discussion Paper Series 19-03, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    2. Pierre M. Picard & Thi Thu Huyen Tran, 2020. "A Welfare Evaluation of Green Urban Areas," DEM Discussion Paper Series 20-21, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    3. Picard, P.M. & Tran, T.T.H., 2021. "Small urban green areas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Elena G. Irwin, 2010. "New Directions For Urban Economic Models Of Land Use Change: Incorporating Spatial Dynamics And Heterogeneity," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 65-91, February.
    5. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    6. Newburn, David & Berck, Peter, 2011. "Exurban development," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 323-336.
    7. Chen, Yong & Irwin, Elena G. & Jayaprakash, Ciriyam & Irwin, Nicholas B., 2017. "Market thinness, income sorting and leapfrog development across the urban-rural gradient," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 213-223.
    8. Coisnon, Thomas & Oueslati, Walid & Salanié, Julien, 2014. "Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 38-49.
    9. Camille Régnier, 2020. "Open space preservation in an urbanization context," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 443-458, June.
    10. Lewis, David J. & Provencher, Bill & Butsic, Van, 2009. "The dynamic effects of open-space conservation policies on residential development density," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 239-252, May.
    11. Dominique Peeters & Geoffrey Caruso & Jean Cavailhès & Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Gilles Vuidel, 2015. "Emergence Of Leapfrogging From Residential Choice With Endogenous Green Space: Analytical Results," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 491-512, June.
    12. Mikaela Backman & Pia Nilsson, 2018. "The role of cultural heritage in attracting skilled individuals," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(1), pages 111-138, February.
    13. Magliocca, Nicholas & McConnell, Virginia & Walls, Margaret, 2015. "Exploring sprawl: Results from an economic agent-based model of land and housing markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 114-125.
    14. Chen, Yong & Irwin, Elena G. & Jayaprakash, Ciriyam, 2011. "Incorporating Spatial Complexity into Economic Models of Land Markets and Land Use Change," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 40(3), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Guillaume POUYANNE, 2008. "Economics of discontinuous urban development (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2008-07, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    16. Rémi Lemoy & Charles Raux & Pablo Jensen, 2016. "Exploring the polycentric city with multi-worker households: an agent-based microeconomic model," Post-Print hal-00602087, HAL.
    17. Leonardo J. Basso & Matías Navarro & Hugo Silva, 2020. "Public Transport and Urban Structure," Documentos de Trabajo 549, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    18. Basso, Leonardo J. & Navarro, Matias & Silva, Hugo E., 2021. "Public transport and urban structure," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    19. Caruso, Geoffrey & Peeters, Dominique & Cavailhes, Jean & Rounsevell, Mark, 2007. "Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 542-567, September.
    20. Dokow, Elad & Luque, Jaime, 2019. "Provision of local public goods in mixed income communities," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Urban green spaces; urban spatial structure; land use policy; amenities; optimal locations; mono-centric models; open space; public facilities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:luc:wpaper:20-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Legrand (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crcrplu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.