IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

National Work-Family Policies and Gender Earnings Inequality in 26 OECD Countries, 1999–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Hook

  • Meiying Li

Abstract

We investigate whether work-family policies help incorporate women into the labor market, but exacerbate the gender earnings gap and motherhood penalty, especially for mothers and/or tertiary-educated women. We use repeated cross-sectional income data from the Luxembourg Income Study Database (LIS) 1999–2019 (n = 26 countries, 280 country-years, 2.9 million employees) combined with an original collection of indicators on work-family policies, labor market conditions, and gender norms. We find only one work-family policy, long paid parental leave (> 6 months), is associated with a larger gender earnings gap for mothers and tertiary-educated women. The negative relationship between long paid leave and women’s earning percentile is not well explained by selection, full-time status, work hours, experience, occupation, or sector, suggesting discrimination mechanisms. Our findings add to the growing evidence that long paid leave specifically, as opposed to work-family policies more generally, cleave the labor market outcomes of women from men.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Hook & Meiying Li, 2025. "National Work-Family Policies and Gender Earnings Inequality in 26 OECD Countries, 1999–2019," LIS Working papers 901, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/901.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole Hiekel & Aart C. Liefbroer & Anne-Rigt Poortman, 2014. "Understanding Diversity in the Meaning of Cohabitation Across Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 30(4), pages 391-410, November.
    2. Youngjoo Cha & Kim A. Weeden & Landon Schnabel, 2023. "Is the Gender Wage Gap Really a Family Wage Gap in Disguise?," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(6), pages 972-1001, December.
    3. Eyal Bar-Haim & Louis Chauvel & Janet C. Gornick & Anne Hartung, 2023. "The Persistence of the Gender Earnings Gap: Cohort Trends and the Role of Education in Twelve Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 821-841, February.
    4. Angela Greulich & Aurélien Dasré, 2018. "Observing the Number of Children with EU-SILC: A Quantification of Biases," Population (english edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 0(4), pages 685-719.
    5. Angela Greulich & Aurélien Dasre, 2018. "Observing the Number of Children with EU-SILC: A Quantification of Biases [Observer le nombre d'enfants avec les données EU-SILC]," Post-Print halshs-02118485, HAL.
    6. Lewis, Jeffrey B. & Linzer, Drew A., 2005. "Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 345-364.
    7. Saheli Bose & Somdeep Chatterjee, 2024. "Motherhood Penalty Revisited: Impacts of Maternity Leave Mandates on Nature of Employment Contracts," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(9), pages 1394-1411, September.
    8. Michael Shalev, 2008. "Class Divisions among Women," Politics & Society, , vol. 36(3), pages 421-444, September.
    9. Nicole Hiekel & Aart Liefbroer & Anne-Rigt Poortman, 2014. "Understanding Diversity in the Meaning of Cohabitation Across Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 30(4), pages 391-410, November.
    10. Sophia Fauser & Michael Gebel, 2023. "Labour Market Dualism and the Heterogeneous Wage Gap for Temporary Employment. A Multilevel Study across 30 Countries," LIS Working papers 853, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    11. Christopher J. Ruhm, 1998. "The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(1), pages 285-317.
    12. repec:hal:cesptp:halshs-02129637 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:hal:journl:halshs-02129637 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Uta Schönberg & Johannes Ludsteck, 2014. "Expansions in Maternity Leave Coverage and Mothers' Labor Market Outcomes after Childbirth," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(3), pages 469-505.
    15. Ali Ahmed & Mimmi Gustafsson & Johanna Rydén & Lydia Wallin Claesson, 2025. "Parental Leave Intentions, Gender, and Job Discrimination: Insights From a Swedish Field Experiment," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 39(3), pages 233-245, September.
    16. Angela Greulich & Aurélien Dasre, 2018. "Observing the Number of Children with EU-SILC: A Quantification of Biases [Observer le nombre d'enfants avec les données EU-SILC]," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02118485, HAL.
    17. Rebecca Glauber, 2018. "Trends in the Motherhood Wage Penalty and Fatherhood Wage Premium for Low, Middle, and High Earners," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(5), pages 1663-1680, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brzezinski, Michal & Yaniuk, Artur, 2024. "Health effects of introducing an unconditional child benefit in Poland: Evidence from a difference in differences analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Angela Greulich & Laurent Toulemon, 2023. "Measuring the educational gradient of period fertility in 28 European countries: A new approach based on parity-specific fertility estimates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(34), pages 905-968.
    3. Diogo G.C. Britto & Caio de Holanda & Alexandre Fonseca & Breno Sampaio, 2025. "Parental leave, family, and firms," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2025-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Jones, Kelly & Wilcher, Britni, 2024. "Reducing maternal labor market detachment: A role for paid family leave," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Derek T. Tharp & Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm, 2021. "Gender Differences in the Intended Use of Parental Leave: Implications for Human Capital Development," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 47-60, March.
    6. Grund, Christian, 2015. "Gender pay gaps among highly educated professionals — Compensation components do matter," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 118-126.
    7. Joshua D Gottlieb & Richard R Townsend & Ting Xu, 2022. "Does Career Risk Deter Potential Entrepreneurs?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(9), pages 3973-4015.
    8. Canaan, Serena, 2022. "Parental leave, household specialization and children’s well-being," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Rita Ginja & Jenny Jans & Arizo Karimi, 2020. "Parental Leave Benefits, Household Labor Supply, and Children’s Long-Run Outcomes," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 261-320.
    10. Rita Ginja & Arizo Karimi & Pengpeng Xiao, 2023. "Employer Responses to Family Leave Programs," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 107-135, January.
    11. E. Mark Curtis & Barry T. Hirsch & Mary C. Schroeder, 2016. "Evaluating Workplace Mandates with Flows Versus Stocks: An Application to California Paid Family Leave," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(2), pages 501-526, October.
    12. Frodermann, Corinna & Wrohlich, Katharina & Zucco, Aline, 2023. "Parental Leave Policy and Long-run Earnings of Mothers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Ahammer, Alexander & Glogowsky, Ulrich & Halla, Martin & Hener, Timo, 2023. "The Parenthood Penalty in Mental Health: Evidence from Austria and Denmark," IZA Discussion Papers 16459, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Gozde Corekcioglu & Marco Francesconi & Astrid Kunze, 2025. "Parental Leave from the Firm’s Perspective," CESifo Working Paper Series 11868, CESifo.
    15. Lalive, Rafael, 2021. "Mothers at Work: How Mandating Paid Maternity Leave Affects Employment, Earnings and Fertility," CEPR Discussion Papers 16418, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Maya Rossin-Slater, 2017. "Maternity and Family Leave Policy," NBER Working Papers 23069, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Claudia Olivetti & Barbara Petrongolo, 2017. "The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 205-230, Winter.
    18. Julio E. Romero Prieto, 2018. "La maternidad y el empleo formal en Colombia," Documentos de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 268, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    19. Hadas Mandel, 2010. "Winners and Losers: The Consequences of Welfare State Policies for Gender Wage Inequality," LIS Working papers 550, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    20. Gong, Yifan & Stinebrickner, Ralph & Stinebrickner, Todd, 2022. "Marriage, children, and labor supply: Beliefs and outcomes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 148-164.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.