IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v88y2023i6p972-1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Gender Wage Gap Really a Family Wage Gap in Disguise?

Author

Listed:
  • Youngjoo Cha
  • Kim A. Weeden
  • Landon Schnabel

Abstract

Despite large literatures on gender and family wage gaps (e.g., the motherhood wage penalty, fatherhood wage premium, and the marriage premium) and widespread recognition that the two gaps are intertwined, the extent and pattern of their relationships are underexplored. Using data from the 2018 Survey of Income and Program Participation, we show that family wage gaps are strongly associated with the gender wage gap, as long assumed in the literature, but with important caveats. The gender-differentiated wage returns to parenthood contribute 29 percent of the gender wage gap. One third of this is associated with occupation, but very little with other worker and job attributes. The gender-differentiated returns to marriage contribute another 33 percent, two thirds of which is associated with worker and job attributes but very little with occupation. However, 36 percent of the gender wage gap is unrelated to these family wage gaps, and the gender wage gap among childless workers remains substantial. Moreover, for Black and Hispanic workers, the pattern of association is more complex and generally weaker than for White workers. These results caution against focusing solely on the wage gap between “mothers and others†and suggest new directions for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngjoo Cha & Kim A. Weeden & Landon Schnabel, 2023. "Is the Gender Wage Gap Really a Family Wage Gap in Disguise?," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(6), pages 972-1001, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:88:y:2023:i:6:p:972-1001
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224231212464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224231212464
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224231212464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:88:y:2023:i:6:p:972-1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.