IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18958.html

Inequality, Fiscal Policy and Satisfaction with the Government: Decomposition and Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Fiorani, Federico

    (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER); University of Luxembourg)

  • Sologon, Denisa

    (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER))

  • Jara, Xavier

    (London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), Universidad Loyola Andalucia)

Abstract

Government satisfaction rose sharply in Ecuador between 2007 and 2014, a period marked by declining inequality and substantial changes in fiscal and social policy. We examine how far this increase is associated with changes in individual economic circumstances, the wider income distribution, and the tax–benefit system. Using nationally representative household survey data, we combine distributional Fairlie decompositions with a tax–benefit microsimulation counterfactual. Changes in observed socioeconomic characteristics explain around one fifth of the increase in satisfaction in the middle of the distribution. Within this explained component, the decline in provincial income inequality is more important than changes in individual disposable income. The tax–benefit counterfactual points in the same direction: predicted satisfaction would generally have been lower had the 2014 population faced the 2007 tax–benefit rules. The results reveal substantial heterogeneity across income groups, with the counterfactual differences more pronounced among the poor. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of distinguishing individual economic resources from broader distributional conditions when examining evaluations of government.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiorani, Federico & Sologon, Denisa & Jara, Xavier, 2026. "Inequality, Fiscal Policy and Satisfaction with the Government: Decomposition and Simulation," IZA Discussion Papers 18958, IZA Network @ LISER.
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18958.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oswald, Andrew J., 2008. "On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 369-372, September.
    2. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    3. Jonah B. Gelbach, 2016. "When Do Covariates Matter? And Which Ones, and How Much?," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(2), pages 509-543.
    4. Fairlie, Robert W, 1999. "The Absence of the African-American Owned Business: An Analysis of the Dynamics of Self-Employment," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 80-108, January.
    5. Kinder, Donald R. & Kiewiet, D. Roderick, 1981. "Sociotropic Politics: The American Case," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 129-161, April.
    6. Kaiser, Caspar & Lepinteur, Anthony, 2025. "Measuring the Unmeasurable? Systematic Evidence on Scale Transformations in Subjective Survey Data," SocArXiv 3gmzy_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Meehl, Paul E., 1977. "The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-Away Vote Argument," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 11-30, March.
    8. H. Xavier Jara & María Cecilia Deza Delgado & Nicolás Oliva & Javier Torres, 2023. "Financial disincentives to formal employment and tax-benefit systems in Latin America," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(1), pages 69-113, February.
    9. Olivier Bargain & Tim Callan, 2010. "Analysing the effects of tax-benefit reforms on income distribution: a decomposition approach," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Holly Sutherland & Francesco Figari, 2013. "EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 1(6), pages 4-26.
    11. Wu, Qian & Kaplan, David M., 2025. "Regression and decomposition with ordinal health outcomes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. DiNardo, John & Fortin, Nicole M & Lemieux, Thomas, 1996. "Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(5), pages 1001-1044, September.
    13. Jean Grugel & Pia Riggirozzi, 2018. "New directions in welfare: rights-based social policies in post-neoliberal Latin America," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 527-543, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonczyk, Dirk & Fitzenberger, Bernd & Sommerfeld, Katrin, 2010. "Rising wage inequality, the decline of collective bargaining, and the gender wage gap," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 835-847, October.
    2. Nerijus Černiauskas & Denisa M. Sologon & Cathal O’Donoghue & Linas Tarasonis, 2022. "Income Inequality and Redistribution in Lithuania: The Role of Policy, Labor Market, Income, and Demographics," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(S1), pages 131-166, April.
    3. Denisa M. Sologon & Philippe Kerm & Jinjing Li & Cathal O’Donoghue, 2021. "Accounting for differences in income inequality across countries: tax-benefit policy, labour market structure, returns and demographics," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(1), pages 13-43, March.
    4. Denisa M. Sologon & Cathal O’Donoghue & Iryna Kyzyma & Jinjing Li & Jules Linden & Raymond Wagener, 2022. "The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 777-809, December.
    5. H. Xavier Jara & David Rodríguez & Diego Collado & Javier Torres & Andrés Mideros & Lourdes Montesdeoca & Andrés Avellaneda & Rodrigo Chang & Omar Vanegas, 2025. "Assessing the role of tax‐benefit policies during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from the Andean region," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 226-246, February.
    6. Mathias Dolls & Karina Doorley & Alari Paulus & Hilmar Schneider & Eric Sommer, 2019. "Demographic change and the European income distribution," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(3), pages 337-357, September.
    7. Nerijus Cerniauskas & Denisa M. Sologon & Cathal O’Donoghue & Linas Tarasonis, 2020. "Changes in income inequality in Lithuania: the role of policy, labour market structure, returns and demographics," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 71, Bank of Lithuania.
    8. Makarski, Krzysztof & Tyrowicz, Joanna, 2023. "Preference for redistribution during structural change with labor mobility frictions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Bonaccolto-Töpfer, Marina & Satlukal, Sascha, 2024. "Gender differences in reservation wages: New evidence for Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Sloczynski, Tymon, 2013. "Population Average Gender Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 7315, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Collischon Matthias, 2019. "Is There a Glass Ceiling over Germany?," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 329-359, December.
    12. Domenico Depalo & Raffaela Giordano & Evangelia Papapetrou, 2015. "Public–private wage differentials in euro-area countries: evidence from quantile decomposition analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 985-1015, November.
    13. Ana Fernandes & Martin Huber & Giannina Vaccaro, 2021. "Gender differences in wage expectations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, June.
    14. Pylypchuk, Yuriy & Selden, Thomas M., 2008. "A discrete choice decomposition analysis of racial and ethnic differences in children's health insurance coverage," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1109-1128, July.
    15. Jan Eeckhout & Roberto Pinheiro & Kurt Schmidheiny, 2014. "Spatial Sorting," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 122(3), pages 554-620.
    16. Ekaterina Tosheva & Iva Tasseva & Dragomir Draganov & Venelin Boshnakov, 2016. "Effects of changes in tax-transfer system on households income distribution in Bulgaria: simulation analysis using EUROMOD for 2011-2015," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 51-71,72-91.
    17. Jinjing Li & Yogi Vidyattama & Hai Anh La & Riyana Miranti & Denisa M Sologon, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 and Policy Responses on Australian Income Distribution and Poverty," Papers 2009.04037, arXiv.org.
    18. Micole De Vera & Javier Garcia‐Brazales, 2025. "Establishment size and the task content of jobs: evidence from 46 countries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 92(366), pages 548-579, April.
    19. SOLOGON Denisa & ALMEIDA Vanda & VAN KERM Philippe, 2019. "Accounting for the distributional effects of the 2007-2008 crisis and the Economic Adjustment Program in Portugal," LISER Working Paper Series 2019-05, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    20. Andrew Dustan & Diana Ngo, 2026. "Unpacking the Socioeconomic Status Gap in Exam-Based School Admissions," Working Papers 178, Economics Department, William & Mary.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.