IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp16000.html

Artificial Intelligence and the Economics of Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Naudé, Wim

    (RWTH Aachen University)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) scientists are challenged to create intelligent, autonomous agents that can make rational decisions. In this challenge, they confront two questions: what decision theory to follow and how to implement it in AI systems. This paper provides answers to these questions and makes three contributions. The first is to discuss how economic decision theory – Expected Utility Theory (EUT) – can help AI systems with utility functions to deal with the problem of instrumental goals, the possibility of utility function instability, and coordination challenges in multi-actor and human-agent collectives settings. The second contribution is to show that using EUT restricts AI systems to narrow applications, which are "small worlds" where concerns about AI alignment may lose urgency and be better labelled as safety issues. This papers third contribution points to several areas where economists may learn from AI scientists as they implement EUT. These include consideration of procedural rationality, overcoming computational difficulties, and understanding decision-making in disequilibrium situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Naudé, Wim, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and the Economics of Decision-Making," IZA Discussion Papers 16000, IZA Network @ LISER.
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp16000.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. LeRoy, Stephen F & Singell, Larry D, Jr, 1987. "Knight on Risk and Uncertainty," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 394-406, April.
    3. Elliot Lipnowski & Doron Ravid, 2022. "Predicting Choice from Information Costs," Papers 2205.10434, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    4. Chen, Xiaolu & Weng, Tongfeng & Li, Chunzi & Yang, Huijie, 2022. "Equivalence of machine learning models in modeling chaos," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    5. Ivan Moscati, 2016. "Retrospectives: How Economists Came to Accept Expected Utility Theory: The Case of Samuelson and Savage," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 219-236, Spring.
    6. Joseph Persky, 1995. "The Ethology of Homo Economicus," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 221-231, Spring.
    7. repec:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:86:p:04 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Michael Haigh & John List, 2005. "A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders," Artefactual Field Experiments 00093, The Field Experiments Website.
    9. Caplin, Andrew & Martin, Daniel & Marx, Philip, 2025. "Modeling machine learning: A cognitive economic approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    10. Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin & Philip Marx, 2022. "Calibrating for Class Weights by Modeling Machine Learning," Papers 2205.04613, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    11. Grossman, Sanford J & Hart, Oliver D, 1983. "An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 7-45, January.
    12. Dirk Nicolas Wagner, 2020. "Economic patterns in a world with artificial intelligence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 111-131, January.
    13. Reinhard Neck, 2021. "Methodological Individualism: Still a Useful Methodology for the Social Sciences?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 349-361, December.
    14. Sims, Christopher A., 2003. "Implications of rational inattention," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 665-690, April.
    15. Tomas Hauer, 2022. "Importance and limitations of AI ethics in contemporary society," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Kunal Pattanayak & Vikram Krishnamurthy, 2021. "Rationally Inattentive Utility Maximization for Interpretable Deep Image Classification," Papers 2102.04594, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    17. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-03295594 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, 2020. "Simple Rules for a Complex World with Arti?cial Intelligence," PIER Working Paper Archive 20-010, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    19. Ian Taylor, 2016. "Dependency redux: why Africa is not rising," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(147), pages 8-25, January.
    20. Dastani, Mehdi & Hulstijn, Joris & van der Torre, Leendert, 2005. "How to decide what to do?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 762-784, February.
    21. Ivan Guo & Nicolas Langrené & Gregoire Loeper & Wei Ning, 2020. "Robust utility maximization under model uncertainty via a penalization approach," Working Papers hal-02910261, HAL.
    22. Richard H. Thaler, 2000. "From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 133-141, Winter.
    23. Ken Binmore, 2007. "Rational Decisions in Large Worlds," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 86, pages 25-41.
    24. Schoemaker, Paul J H, 1982. "The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 529-563, June.
    25. Herbert A. Simon, 1978. "On How to Decide What to Do," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 494-507, Autumn.
    26. Ahiska, S. Sebnem & Appaji, Samyuktha R. & King, Russell E. & Warsing, Donald P., 2013. "A Markov decision process-based policy characterization approach for a stochastic inventory control problem with unreliable sourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 485-496.
    27. Ken Binmore, 2017. "On the Foundations of Decision Theory," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 259-273, December.
    28. Artem Kuriksha, 2021. "An Economy of Neural Networks: Learning from Heterogeneous Experiences," Papers 2110.11582, arXiv.org.
    29. Daniel Ellsberg, 1961. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(4), pages 643-669.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vriend, Nicolaas J., 1996. "Rational behavior and economic theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 263-285, March.
    2. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    3. Kargol-Wasiluk, Aneta & Wildowicz-Giegiel, Anna & Zalesko, Marian, . "Ewolucja człowieka gospodarującego. Od homo oeconomicus do homo moralis," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2018(1).
    4. Hsieh, Sung-Lin & Ke, Shaowei & Wang, Zhaoran & Zhao, Chen, 2025. "Logit neural-network utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin & Philip Marx, 2025. "Rationalizable learning," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 80(1), pages 171-202, August.
    6. Ke, Shaowei & Zhao, Chen, 2024. "From local utility to neural networks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Aneta Kargol-Wasiluk & Anna Wildowicz-Giegiel & Marian Zalesko, 2018. "The Evolution of the Economic Man. From Homo Oeconomicus to Homo Moralis," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 33-57.
    8. Luca Congiu & Ivan Moscati, 2022. "A review of nudges: Definitions, justifications, effectiveness," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 188-213, February.
    9. Onesun Steve Yoo & Rakesh Sarin, 2018. "Consumer Choice and Market Outcomes Under Ambiguity in Product Quality," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 445-468, May.
    10. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    11. Benchimol, Jonathan & Bounader, Lahcen & Dotta, Mario, 2025. "Estimating Behavioral Inattention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    12. repec:esx:essedp:770 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Scharfenaker, Ellis, 2020. "Implications of quantal response statistical equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Michaël Lainé, 2014. "Vers une alternative au paradigme de la rationalité ? Victoires et déboires du programme spinoziste en économie," Post-Print hal-01335618, HAL.
    15. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    16. Segal, Uzi, 1987. "The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 28(1), pages 175-202, February.
    17. Emmanuel PETIT, 2010. "The role of regret in the persistence of anomalies in financial markets (In French)," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2010-07, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    18. Giuseppe Pernagallo & Benedetto Torrisi, 2020. "A theory of information overload applied to perfectly efficient financial markets," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 223-236, October.
    19. Eliasson, Gunnar, 2005. "The nature of economic change and management in a new knowledge based information economy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 428-456, October.
    20. MacLeod, W Bentley, 2016. "Human capital: Linking behavior to rational choice via dual process theory," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 20-31.
    21. Aleksander Rubinstein, 2013. "The theory of patronized goods in the optics of comparative methodology," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 1(1), pages 4-32, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Fallak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaalu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.