IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iso/wpaper/0044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Einheit von Hoheit und Betrieb. Amerkungen aus ökonomischer Perspektive

Author

Listed:
  • Egon Franck
  • Torsten Pudack

    () (Institute for Strategy and Business Economics, University of Zurich
    Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL)

Abstract

In der Schweizer Waldwirtschaft orientieren sich die Grenzen der Forstreviere häufig an den Grenzen der Gemeindeperimeter. Revierleitung und Leitung des revieransässigen öffentlichen Forstbetriebes liegen traditionell in der Hand einer Person. Die aktuelle Diskussion über die Branchenstruktur der Schweizer Forstwirtschaft hinterfragt jedoch auch diese so genannte Einheit von Hoheit und Betrieb. Wir nutzen verschiede ökonomische Erklärungsansätze - Produktionswirtschaft, Industrieökonomik und neue Institutionenökonomik - zur Analyse dieses Phänomens.

Suggested Citation

  • Egon Franck & Torsten Pudack, 2005. "Die Einheit von Hoheit und Betrieb. Amerkungen aus ökonomischer Perspektive," Working Papers 0044, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU).
  • Handle: RePEc:iso:wpaper:0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.business.uzh.ch/RePEc/iso/ISU_WPS/44_ISU_full.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2005
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arrow, Kenneth J., 1973. "Higher education as a filter," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 193-216, July.
    2. Tirole, Jean, 1986. "Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 181-214, Fall.
    3. Egon Franck & Urs Meister, 2004. "Vertikale und Horizontale Unternehmenszusammenschlüsse- Ökonomische Grundlagen der Entscheidung über die Unternehmensgrenzen," Working Papers 0031, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iso:wpaper:0044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (IBW IT). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/isuzhch.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.