IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/irh/wpaper/dt72.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyse des déterminants territoriaux du recours aux urgences non suivi d’une hospitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Zeynep Or

    (IRDES Institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé)

  • Anne Penneau

    (IRDES Institut de recherche et documentation en économie de la santé)

Abstract

Les services d’urgence sont essentiels au système de santé afin de traiter rapidement les situations d’urgences médicales. Ils sont cependant souvent utilisés pour des prises en charge non urgentes pouvant être réalisées dans le secteur ambulatoire. La rapide augmentation du volume de passages aux urgences, particulièrement chez les sujets âgés, est une source de pression pour les hôpitaux et le système de soins. Cette étude a pour objectif d’identifier les déterminants territoriaux du recours aux urgences non suivi d’hospitalisation des personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus. Nous employons des modèles multiniveaux permettant d’analyser simultanément le rôle des facteurs associés à des caractéristiques des populations locales (indicateurs d’état de santé et de statut socio-économique) et à l’organisation des soins aux niveaux communal et départemental. Le taux de recours aux urgences varie significativement en fonction de la situation socio-économique et de l’état de santé de la population de la commune. En contrôlant le niveau social et l’état de santé de la commune, le taux de recours aux urgences des personnes âgées est significativement plus faible dans les territoires où l’accessibilité aux soins primaires est facilitée par la disponibilité des professionnels de santé, la permanence de soins et le déplacement au domicile des médecins généralistes. La proximité et la capacité d’accueil des services d’urgence constituent également des facteurs majeurs déterminant l’utilisation des urgences. Les taux élevés de recours aux urgences non suivis d’hospitalisation interrogent sur l’accessibilité aux services de soins ambulatoires et, plus largement, sur l’efficience de l’organisation des soins. Il existe de réelles marges de manœuvres pour réduire le recours aux urgences des personnes âgées par une optimisation du maillage territorial des services de soins ambulatoires. Par ailleurs, investir dans de nouvelles dispositions pour dispenser les soins primaires afin d’assurer la continuité et la coordination des soins peut réduire l’utilisation des services d’urgence et assurer une meilleure qualité et efficience du système de santé.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeynep Or & Anne Penneau, 2017. "Analyse des déterminants territoriaux du recours aux urgences non suivi d’une hospitalisation," Working Papers DT72, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Sep 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:irh:wpaper:dt72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.irdes.fr/recherche/documents-de-travail/072-analyse-des-determinants-territoriaux-du-recours-aux-urgences-non-suivi-d-une-hospitalisation.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomoko Ono & Michael Schoenstein & James Buchan, 2014. "Geographic Imbalances in Doctor Supply and Policy Responses," OECD Health Working Papers 69, OECD Publishing.
    2. Muriel Barlet & Magali Coldefy & Clémentine Collin & Véronique Lucas Gabrielli, 2012. "L’Accessibilité potentielle localisée (APL) : une nouvelle mesure de l’accessibilité aux soins appliquée aux médecins généralistes libéraux en France," Working Papers DT51, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Dec 2012.
    3. Caroline Berchet, 2015. "Emergency Care Services: Trends, Drivers and Interventions to Manage the Demand," OECD Health Working Papers 83, OECD Publishing.
    4. Lewis, Jeffrey B. & Linzer, Drew A., 2005. "Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 345-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damien Bricard & Zeynep Or, 2018. "Does an Early Primary Care Follow-up after Discharge Reduce Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients?," Working Papers DT73, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Mar 2018.
    2. Damien Bricard & Zeynep Or, 2019. "Impact of early primary care follow-up after discharge on hospital readmissions," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 611-623, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Or, Zeynep & Penneau, Anne, 2018. "A Multilevel Analysis of the determinants of emergency care visits by the elderly in France," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 908-914.
    2. Sagan, Anna & Kowalska-Bobko, Iwona & Mokrzycka, Anna, 2016. "The 2015 emergency care reform in Poland: Some improvements, some unmet demands and some looming conflicts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(11), pages 1220-1225.
    3. Norma B. Coe & Jing Guo & R. Tamara Konetzka & Courtney Harold Van Houtven, 2019. "What is the marginal benefit of payment‐induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 678-692, May.
    4. Guillaume Chevillard & Julien Mousquès, 2019. "Accessibilité aux soins et attractivité territoriale : proposition d’une typologie des territoires de vie français," Working Papers DT76, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Jan 2019.
    5. Georgiadis, Georgios & Schumann, Ben, 2021. "Dominant-currency pricing and the global output spillovers from US dollar appreciation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Zhenyu Sun & Ying Sun & Xueyi Liu & Yixue Tu & Shaofan Chen & Dongfu Qian, 2022. "A Refined Evaluation Analysis of Global Healthcare Accessibility Based on the Healthcare Accessibility Index Model and Coupling Coordination Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Battiston, Pietro & Gamba, Simona, 2021. "COVID-19: R0 is lower where outbreak is larger," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 141-147.
    8. Platt, Lucinda & Polavieja, Javier & Radl, Jonas, 2022. "Which integration policies work? The heterogeneous impact of national institutions on immigrants’ labor market attainment in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110955, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Daniel, Vanessa E. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M. & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Flooding risk and housing values: An economic assessment of environmental hazard," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 355-365, December.
    10. Andrea Vaona, 2016. "A nonparametric panel data approach to the cyclical dynamics of price-cost margins in the fourth Kondratieff wave," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 155-170, August.
    11. Bruno Chiarini & Antonella D'Agostino & Elisabetta Marzano & Andrea Regoli, 2017. "Housing Environmental Risk in Urban Areas: Cross Country Comparison and Policy Implications," CESifo Working Paper Series 6822, CESifo.
    12. Harris, J. Andrew & Posner, Daniel N., 2022. "Does decentralization encourage pro-poor targeting? Evidence from Kenya’s constituencies development fund," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Heisig, Jan Paul & Solga, Heike, 2014. "Skills inequalities in 21 countries: PIAAC results for prime-age adults," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2014-503, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Mário Amorim Lopes & Álvaro Almeida & Bernardo Almada-Lobo, 2017. "Physician emigration: should they stay or should they go? A policy analysis," FEP Working Papers 585, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    15. Laudicella, Mauro & Olsen, Kim Rose & Street, Andrew, 2010. "Examining cost variation across hospital departments-a two-stage multi-level approach using patient-level data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1872-1881, November.
    16. Banal-Estanol, Albert & Seldeslachts, Jo & Vives, Xavier, 2022. "Ownership Diversification and Product Market Pricing Incentives," CEPR Discussion Papers 17686, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. T. H. A. Nguyen & T. Laurent & C. Thomas-Agnan & A. Ruiz-Gazen, 2022. "Analyzing the impacts of socio-economic factors on French departmental elections with CoDa methods," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 1235-1251, April.
    18. Catherine E. de Vries, 2010. "EU Issue Voting: Asset or Liability?," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(1), pages 89-117, March.
    19. Emma Galli & Ilde Rizzo & Carla Scaglioni, 2020. "Is transparency spatially determined? An empirical test for Italian municipalities," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(58), pages 6372-6385, December.
    20. Marisa Bucheli & Máximo Rossi, 2016. "Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Latin America," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0116, Department of Economics - dECON.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Organisation des soins primaires; Urgences; Soins des personnes âgées; Modélisation multiniveaux;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irh:wpaper:dt72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jacques Harrouin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/credefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.