IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10280-d891738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Refined Evaluation Analysis of Global Healthcare Accessibility Based on the Healthcare Accessibility Index Model and Coupling Coordination Degree Model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Sun

    (School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China)

  • Ying Sun

    (The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Avenue, Shinan District, Qingdao 266003, China)

  • Xueyi Liu

    (School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China)

  • Yixue Tu

    (School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China)

  • Shaofan Chen

    (School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China)

  • Dongfu Qian

    (School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China
    Center for Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211166, China)

Abstract

Healthcare accessibility (HCA) is directly related to the general well-being of citizens, and the HCA index model is widely used in HCA evaluation. However, the evaluation results of the HCA index model are rough and potentially misleading because it cannot measure the coordination of a country’s performance across the various evaluation dimensions. This study aimed to introduce a coupling coordination degree model to remedy this defect of the HCA index model, conduct a more meticulous evaluation for the global HCA development over the past two decades, present a panorama of global HCA current status, and further contribute precise strategies to enhance global HCA development. Combining the HCA index model and the coupling coordination model, we used the Global Health Observatory (GHO) data to evaluate the development levels of HCA in 186 countries across the world from 2000 to 2018. The results showed that, first, global HCA development has shown a slow upward trend over the past two decades. Second, of the selected 60 representative countries in 2018, the HCA in 86.7% of high-income countries belonged to the optimum development type, the HCA in 73.4% of upper-middle-income countries was in the antagonism-coordination stage of the transition development category, and the HCA in 66.7% of low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) was in the inferior and worst development forms. Third, the Spearman’s correlation coefficient between HCA index and HCA coupling coordination degree was 0.787 ( p < 0.001). The above results indicate that the dilemma of HCA development in LMICs lies not only in the poor healthcare resources, but also in weak ability to allocate healthcare resources effectively. As the lack of healthcare resources cannot be alleviated in a short time, LMICs ought to prioritize effective healthcare resources allocation, such as developing new basic healthcare kits adapted to low-resource setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Sun & Ying Sun & Xueyi Liu & Yixue Tu & Shaofan Chen & Dongfu Qian, 2022. "A Refined Evaluation Analysis of Global Healthcare Accessibility Based on the Healthcare Accessibility Index Model and Coupling Coordination Degree Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10280-:d:891738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10280/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10280/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomoko Ono & Michael Schoenstein & James Buchan, 2014. "Geographic Imbalances in Doctor Supply and Policy Responses," OECD Health Working Papers 69, OECD Publishing.
    2. Felipa de Mello-Sampayo, 2020. "Spatial Interaction Model for Healthcare Accessibility: What Scale Has to Do with It," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Thomas Blaschke & Stefan Kienberger, 2017. "Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 719-739, September.
    4. Xiaodong Di & Lijian Wang & Xiuliang Dai & Liu Yang, 2020. "Assessing the Accessibility of Home-Based Healthcare Services for the Elderly: A Case from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Visconti, Roberto Moro & Larocca, Alberto & Marconi, Michele, 2020. "Accessibility to First-Mile health services: A time-cost model for rural Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Tomoko Ono & Gaétan Lafortune & Michael Schoenstein, 2013. "Health Workforce Planning in OECD Countries: A Review of 26 Projection Models from 18 Countries," OECD Health Working Papers 62, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chojnicki, Xavier & Moullan, Yasser, 2018. "Is there a ‘pig cycle’ in the labour supply of doctors? How training and immigration policies respond to physician shortages," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 227-237.
    2. Vicarelli, Giovanna & Pavolini, Emmanuele, 2015. "Health workforce governance in Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(12), pages 1606-1612.
    3. Wende, Danny & Kopetsch, Thomas & Richter, Wolfram F., 2020. "Planning health care capacities with a gravity equation," Ruhr Economic Papers 888, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Mário Amorim Lopes & Álvaro Almeida & Bernardo Almada-Lobo, 2017. "Physician emigration: should they stay or should they go? A policy analysis," FEP Working Papers 585, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    5. Zuraida Abal Abas & Mohamad Raziff Ramli & Mohamad Ishak Desa & Nordin Saleh & Ainul Nadziha Hanafiah & Nuraini Aziz & Zaheera Zainal Abidin & Abdul Samad Shibghatullah & Ahmad Fadzli Nizam Abdul Rahm, 2018. "A supply model for nurse workforce projection in Malaysia," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 573-586, December.
    6. Holte, Jon Helgheim & Kjaer, Trine & Abelsen, Birgit & Olsen, Jan Abel, 2015. "The impact of pecuniary and non-pecuniary incentives for attracting young doctors to rural general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Bangyu Liu & Ning Qiu & Tianjie Zhang, 2023. "Accessibility of Elderly Care Facilities Based on Social Stratification: A Case Study in Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Katarzyna Dubas‐Jakóbczyk & Alicja Domagała & Marcin Mikos, 2019. "Impact of the doctor deficit on hospital management in Poland: A mixed‐method study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 187-195, January.
    9. Pedro Ramos & Hélio Alves & Paulo Guimarães & Maria A. Ferreira, 2017. "Junior doctors’ medical specialty and practice location choice: simulating policies to overcome regional inequalities," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(8), pages 1013-1030, November.
    10. Matthieu Cassou & Julien Mousquès & Carine Franc, 2020. "General practitioners’ income and activity: the impact of multi-professional group practice in France," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(9), pages 1295-1315, December.
    11. Itzik Fadlon & Frederik Plesner Lyngse & Torben Heien Nielsen, 2022. "Early Career Setbacks and Women’s Career-Family Trade-Off," CEBI working paper series 22-06, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    12. Katarina Mostarac & Petar Mostarac & Zvonko Kavran & Dragana Šarac, 2022. "Determining Optimal Locations of Postal Access Points Based on Simulated Annealing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Omid Ghorbanzadeh, 2018. "Comparing Classic and Interval Analytical Hierarchy Process Methodologies for Measuring Area-Level Deprivation to Analyze Health Inequalities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Igor Sheiman & Vladimir Shevski, 2017. "Two Models of Primary Health Care Development: Russia vs. Central and Eastern European Countries," HSE Working papers WP BRP 06/PSP/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Anna-Theresa Renner & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2020. "Modeling inter-regional patient mobility: Does distance go far enough?," Economics working papers 2020-04, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    16. Robin Gauld & Simon Horsburgh, 2016. "Does a host country capture knowledge of migrant doctors and how might it? A study of UK doctors in New Zealand," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(1), pages 1-8, January.
    17. Anderson, Michael & O'Neill, Ciaran & Macleod Clark, Jill & Street, Andrew & Woods, Michael & Johnston-Webber, Charlotte & Charlesworth, Anita & Whyte, Moira & Foster, Margaret & Majeed, Azeem & Pitch, 2021. "Securing a sustainable and fit-for-purpose UK health and care workforce," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110809, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Mougeot, Michel & Naegelen, Florence, 2018. "Achieving a fair geographical distribution of health-care resources," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 384-392.
    19. Sutton, Claire & Prowse, Julie & McVey, Lynn & Elshehaly, Mai & Neagu, Daniel & Montague, Jane & Alvarado, Natasha & Tissiman, Chris & O'Connell, Kate & Eyers, Emma & Faisal, Muhammad & Randell, Rebec, 2023. "Strategic workforce planning in health and social care – an international perspective: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Madhan Balasubramanian & Aliya Hasan & Suruchi Ganbavale & Anfal Alolayah & Jennifer Gallagher, 2021. "Planning the Future Oral Health Workforce: A Rapid Review of Supply, Demand and Need Models, Data Sources and Skill Mix Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-33, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10280-:d:891738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.