IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imk/report/127-2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inflation trotz Aufschwung zu niedrig - Prognose-Update: Die konjunkturelle Lage in Deutschland zur Jahresmitte

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Hohlfeld

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Katja Rietzler

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Thomas Theobald

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Silke Tober

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

  • Sebastian Watzka

    (Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK))

Abstract

Der moderate Aufschwung in Deutschland bleibt intakt, die Inflation verharrt aber deutlich unterhalb des Inflationsziels der EZB. Die Konjunktur der übrigen Weltwirtschaft gewinnt etwas an Dynamik. Davon profitieren die deutschen Exporte. Die großen Zentralbanken halten an ihrem stark expansiven geldpolitischen Kurs grundsätzlich fest und straffen die geldpolitischen Zügel nur behutsam. Der bereits auf breiterer Basis stehende Aufschwung im Euroraum wird sich vor diesem Hintergrund festigen, aber die Inflationsrate wird sich nur im Schneckentempo in Richtung Inflationsziel bewegen. Bei anziehenden Investitionen und etwas gedämpftem Konsum wird das Euroraum-BIP in den Jahren 2017 und 2018 mit jeweils 1,9 % etwas stärker zunehmen als zuvor.Die Fortsetzung des Aufschwungs in Deutschland geht mit einer Verlagerung der Wachstumskräfte einher. Der Konsum büßt an Dynamik ein, während die Investitions- und Auslandsnachfrage an Fahrt gewinnen. Der Anstieg des BIP wird 2017 1,5 % (kalenderbereinigt: 1,8 %) und 2018 1,8 % (kalenderbereinigt: 1,8 %) betragen. Die Arbeitslosenquote liegt bei 5,7 % (2018: 5,5 %) und trotz der guten Beschäftigungslage steigen die Verbraucherpreise nur verhalten um 1,6 % (2018: 1,5 %).

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Hohlfeld & Katja Rietzler & Thomas Theobald & Silke Tober & Sebastian Watzka, 2017. "Inflation trotz Aufschwung zu niedrig - Prognose-Update: Die konjunkturelle Lage in Deutschland zur Jahresmitte," IMK Report 127-2017, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:imk:report:127-2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_imk_report_127_2017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abiad (ADB), Abdul & Furceri (IMF and University of Palermo), Davide & Topalova (IMF), Petia, 2016. "The macroeconomic effects of public investment: Evidence from advanced economies," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 224-240.
    2. Dieter Vesper, 2016. "Aktuelle Entwicklungstendenzen und zukünftiger Personalbedarf im Öffentlichen Dienst," IMK Studies 51-2016, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    3. Gustav A. Horn & Peter Hohlfeld & Sabine Stephan & Thomas Theobald & Silke Tober, 2016. "Brexit lähmt Konjunktur," IMK Report 115-2016, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    4. Gustav Horn & Sebastian Gechert & Alexander Herzog-Stein & Ansgar Rannenberg & Katja Rietzler & Silke Tober, 2015. "Wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderungen 2015," IMK Report 102-2015, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Hohlfeld & Katja Rietzler & Sabine Stephan & Thomas Theobald & Silke Tober & Sebastian Watzka, 2017. "Aufschwung breit aufgestellt! Prognose-Update: Die konjunkturelle Lage in Deutschland zur Jahreswende 2017/2018," IMK Report 132-2017, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Cyrille Lenoël & Corrado Macchiarelli & Garry Young, 2022. "Greece 2010-18: What could we have done differently?," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 172, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    3. Hans Pitlik & Michael Klien & Stefan Schiman, 2017. "Stabilitätskonforme Berücksichtigung nachhaltiger öffentlicher Investitionen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60595, April.
    4. Kose,Ayhan & Ohnsorge,Franziska Lieselotte & Ye,Lei Sandy & Islamaj,Ergys, 2017. "Weakness in investment growth : causes, implications and policy responses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7990, The World Bank.
    5. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "Duration of membership in the world trade organization and investment-oriented remittances inflows," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    6. Noel Rapa & Abigail Marie Rapa, "undated". "The macroeconomic effects of closing the public sector capital gap in Malta," CBM Policy Papers PP/07/2019, Central Bank of Malta.
    7. Mario Alloza & Danilo Leiva-León & Alberto Urtasun, 2022. "The response of private investment to an increase in public investment," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 2/2022.
    8. Nazim Belhocine & La-Bhus Fah Jirasavetakul, 2020. "Lessons from Two Public Sector Reforms in Italy," IMF Working Papers 2020/040, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Marcello Minenna & Dario Aversa, 2019. "A Revised European Stability Mechanism to Realize Risk Sharing on Public Debts at Market Conditions and Realign Economic Cycles in the Euro Area," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 48(1), February.
    10. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Duration of WTO Membership and Investment-Oriented Remittances Flows," EconStor Preprints 251274, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    11. Carranza-Ugarte, Luis & Díaz-Saavedra, Julián & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique, 2023. "Rethinking fiscal rules," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 833-857.
      • Luis Carranza Ugarte & Julian Diaz Saavedra & Jose Enrique Galdon-Sanchez, 2021. "Rethinking fiscal rules," ThE Papers 21/14, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    12. Amarachukwu Anthony ANYANWU, 2021. "Debt-financed public investment in developing countries: Does the efficiency of public investment matter?," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(626), S), pages 259-272, Spring.
    13. Jean-Marc Fournier & Manuel Bétin, 2018. "Sovereign defaults: Evidence on the importance of government effectiveness," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1494, OECD Publishing.
    14. Sajad Ahmad Bhat & Javed Ahmad Bhat & Taufeeq Ajaz, 2020. "The Public–Private Investment Nexus In India: Evidence From A Policy Simulation Approach," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(224), pages 101-128, January –.
    15. Afonso, António & Jalles, João Tovar, 2019. "The Fiscal consequences of deflation: Evidence from the Golden Age of Globalization," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 129-147.
    16. João Tovar Jalles & Mr. Paulo A Medas, 2022. "Economic Growth After Debt Surges," IMF Working Papers 2022/159, International Monetary Fund.
    17. António Afonso & Miguel St. Aubyn, 2016. "Economic Growth and Public and Private Investment Returns," Working Papers Department of Economics 2016/14, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    18. Moulaye Bamba & Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea, 2020. "The effects of fiscal consolidations on the composition of government spending," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(14), pages 1517-1532, March.
    19. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    20. Khanna, Rupika & Sharma, Chandan, 2021. "Does infrastructure stimulate total factor productivity? A dynamic heterogeneous panel analysis for Indian manufacturing industries," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 59-73.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imk:report:127-2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Nemitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imkhbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.