IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ila/ilades/inv147.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estructura de la Industria y Relaciones Patrimoniales del Gas Natural en Chile

Author

Abstract

El principal aporte de este artículo es entregar de manera sistemática y confiable una descripción de la estructura y relaciones de propiedad prevalecientes en la industria de Gas Natural en Chile. Se muestra que esta industria se encuentra geogràficamente segmentada en cuatro zonas: Norte, Centro, Sur y Magallanes. El desarrollo de las redes de Gas Natural dentro de cada zona es relativamente limitado y las estructuras de mercado en los segmentos de transporte y distribución, por el lado de la oferta, están concentradas. Por el lado de la demanda existen rasgos particulares dentro de cada zona, siendo común la mayor importancia de la demanda industrial por sobre la residencial. Se destaca la importancia de la relación que existe entre capacidad máxima de transporte, capacidad contratada y capacidad utilizada de las redes. Se observa una baja utilización de las redes, brindando una señal de baja eficiencia productiva al no aprovechar las economías de escala en el transporte del Gas Natural. Se analiza asimismo el grado de integración vertical dentro de cada zona, a través de las relaciones patrimoniales existentes entre las empresas participantes. Es un tópico importante de analizar debido a que la ausencia o no de competencia en mercados claves de alguna manera justifican o desechan la posibilidad de regular precios en la industria.

Suggested Citation

  • Constanza Fosco Perea Muñoz & Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Estructura de la Industria y Relaciones Patrimoniales del Gas Natural en Chile," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv147, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ila:ilades:inv147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fen.uahurtado.cl/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/inv147.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dailami, Mansoor & Hauswald, Robert, 2000. "Risk shifting and long-term contracts : evidence from the Ras Gas Project," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2469, The World Bank.
    2. Juris, Andrej, 1998. "The emergence of markets in the natural gas industry," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1895, The World Bank.
    3. Jadresic, Alejandro, 2000. "Investment in natural gas pipelines in the Southern Cone of Latin America," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2315, The World Bank.
    4. Loomis, David & Malm, Eric, 1999. "Active Market Share: measuring competitiveness in retail energy markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 213-221, December.
    5. David M. Newbery, 2002. "Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262640481, December.
    6. Christopher C. Geczy & Bernadette A. Minton & Catherine Schrand, "undated". "Choices Among Alternative Risk Management Strategies: Evidence from the Natural Gas Industry," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 28-99, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constanza Fosco Perea Muñoz & Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Precios de Gas Natural en Chile: Una Primera Mirada al Desempeño de un Mercado Liberalizado," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv148, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    2. Constanza Fosco Perea Muñoz & Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Mercados de Gas Natual: Análisis Comparado de la Experiencia Internacional," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv150, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constanza Fosco Perea Muñoz & Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Mercados de Gas Natual: Análisis Comparado de la Experiencia Internacional," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv150, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    2. Karsten Neuhoff, 2002. "Optimal congestion treatment for bilateral electricity trading," Working Papers EP05, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. João Lizardo de Araújo, 2001. "A questão do investimento no Setor Elétrico Brasileiro: reforma e crise [The investment in the Brazilian power sector: reform and crisis]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 11(1), pages 77-96, July.
    4. Nikolaos Georgantzis & Aitor Ciarreta & Carlos Gutiérrez-Hita, 2010. "Renewable sources, technology mix, and competiton in liberalized electricity markets: the case of Spain," Working Papers. Serie EC 2010-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    5. Reinhard Madlener & Weiyu Gao & Ilja Neustadt & Peter Zweifel, 2008. "Promoting renewable electricity generation in imperfect markets: price vs. quantity policies," SOI - Working Papers 0809, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich.
    6. Hugh Goldsmith, 2014. "The Long-Run Evolution of Infrastructure Services," CESifo Working Paper Series 5073, CESifo.
    7. Jamasb, T. & Mota, R. & Newbery, D. & Pollitt, M., 2004. "‘Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries: A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Determinants and Performance’," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0439, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. Gómez Fernández, Juan F. & Márquez, Adolfo Crespo & López-Campos, Mónica A., 2016. "Customer-oriented risk assessment in network utilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 72-83.
    9. Levine, Paul & Rickman, Neil, 2002. "Price Regulation, Investment and the Commitment Problem," CEPR Discussion Papers 3200, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. repec:idb:brikps:310 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Michael Polemis & Konstantinos Eleftheriou, 2018. "To Regulate Or To Deregulate? The Role Of Downstream Competition In Upstream Monopoly Vertically Linked Markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 51-63, January.
    12. T. Jamasb & R. Nepal, 2015. "Issues and Options in the Economic Regulation of European Network Security," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 16(1), pages 2-23, March.
    13. Zhang, Yinfang & Parker, David & Kirkpatrick, Colin, 2005. "Competition, regulation and privatisation of electricity generation in developing countries: does the sequencing of the reforms matter?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 358-379, May.
    14. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Michael L. Polemis & Thanasis Stengos, 2017. "Electricity Sector Performance: A Panel Threshold Analysis," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    16. Carlos Pombo & Manuel Ramirez, 2002. "Privatization in Colombia: a plant performance analysis," Borradores de Investigación 3377, Universidad del Rosario.
    17. Aaron Tornell, 1999. "Privatizing the Privatized," NBER Working Papers 7206, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Martin Hellwig, 2008. "Competition Policy and Sector-Specific Regulation for Network Industries," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_29, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    19. Stern, Jon & Cubbin, John, 2005. "Regulatory effectiveness : the impact of regulation and regulatory governance arrangements on electricity industry outcomes," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3536, The World Bank.
    20. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2015. "Incentive regulation and utility benchmarking for electricity network security," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 117-127.
    21. Newbery, D., 2002. "Regulatory Challenges to European Electricity Liberalisation," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0230, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ila:ilades:inv147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mauricio Tejada (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deilacl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.