IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/14586.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leadership and Management of Public Sector Undertakings in an Emerging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Vishal
  • Kulkarni, Swanand
  • Khatri, Naresh

Abstract

Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) contribute significantly to the growth and economic development of any country. This study explores the key managerial challenges faced by the leaders and managers of public sector organizations. We interviewed 42 senior managers of PSUs from various industries representing 12 Indian states representing all the regions of India. Specifically, three key managerial challenges emerged in our study: political interference and lack of autonomy, rigid rules and HR practices, and lack of employee motivation. Positive leader personality, communication skills, change- and relation-oriented behaviors, HR skills, and decision-making emerged as top leader qualities. Staffing, training and development and performance management emerged as the top priorities of HR departments of PSUs. Public-service motivation, job security and work environment were the top reasons for continuing to work in PSUs for Indian leaders. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Vishal & Kulkarni, Swanand & Khatri, Naresh, 2018. "Leadership and Management of Public Sector Undertakings in an Emerging Economy," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-01-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/17499772842018-01-04.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leslie, Keith & Canwell, Adam, 2010. "Leadership at all levels: Leading public sector organisations in an age of austerity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 297-305, August.
    2. George A. Boyne, 1998. "Public Services Under New Labour: Back to Bureaucracy?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 43-50, July.
    3. Rachita Satyawadi & Piyali Ghosh, 2012. "Motivation and work values in Indian public and private sector enterprises: a comparative study," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 237-253.
    4. George A. Boyne, 2002. "Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 97-122, January.
    5. Sanjay Sehgal & Muneesh Kumar & Priyanshi Gupta, 2014. "Public Sector Disinvestment in India," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 6(2), pages 181-202, May.
    6. P.K. Jain & Seema Gupta & Surendra S. Yadav, 2014. "Public Sector Enterprises in India," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-81-322-1762-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suneel Maheshwari & Vasudha Gupta & Deepak Raghava Naik, 2022. "Development of Risk Index and Risk Governance Index: Application in Indian Public Sector Undertakings," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling & Barbara Janta & Iveta Reinholde & Christian van Stolk, 2016. "Hidden costs of cuts: Austerity, civil service management and the motivation of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe after the crisis," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 5(2), pages 120-137, December.
    3. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    4. Arundel, Anthony & Casali, Luca & Hollanders, Hugo, 2015. "How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and knowledge-scanning innovation methods," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1271-1282.
    5. Leask, Anna, 2010. "Progress in visitor attraction research: Towards more effective management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 155-166.
    6. Thi Cam Tu Luong & Ann Jorissen & Ine Paeleman, 2019. "Performance Measurement for Sustainability: Does Firm Ownership Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-35, August.
    7. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    8. Giuliana Bronzoni Liberato & Marcelo Sanches Pagliarussi, 2008. "Disclosure de estratégia em relatórios anuais: a influência das dimensões culturais, do sistema legal e da governança corporativa em empresas de quatro países," Fucape Working Papers 03, Fucape Business School.
    9. Vahid Javidroozi & Hanifa Shah & Gerald Feldman, 2022. "Facilitating Smart City Development through Adaption of the Learnings from Enterprise Systems Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Monika Kansal & Nava Subramaniam & Shekar Babu & Suresh Mony, 2020. "CSR in Government-Owned Enterprises in India: A Principal–Agent Perspective," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Bodo B. Schlegelmilch & Ilona Szőcs (ed.), Rethinking Business Responsibility in a Global Context, pages 219-236, Springer.
    11. Jan-Erik Johanson & Elias Pekkola & Päivi Husman, 2017. "Government Programme as a Strategy—The Finnish Experience," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Halit Karaxha, 2019. "The Importance of Implementing Changes in Organizations," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 22(72), pages 25-36, June.
    13. Waring, Justin & Bishop, Simon, 2012. "Going private: Clinicians’ experience of working in UK Independent Sector Treatment Centres," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 172-178.
    14. Marian W. Moszoro & Pablo T. Spiller, 2018. "Implications of Third Parties for Contract Design," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(1), pages 5-16, March.
    15. Or Shkoler & Aharon Tziner, 2020. "Leadership Styles as Predictors of Work Attitudes: A Moderated–Mediation Link," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(53), pages 164-164, February.
    16. Medvedska Oksana & Berzisa Solvita, 2015. "Selection of Software Development Project Lifecycle Model in Government Institution," Information Technology and Management Science, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 5-11, December.
    17. Stavrou, Eleni T. & Charalambous, Christakis & Spiliotis, Stelios, 2007. "Human resource management and performance: A neural network analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 453-467, August.
    18. Daniel Pop & Roxana Radu, 2013. "Challenges to Local Authorities under EU Structural Funds: Evidence from Mixed Quasi-markets for Public Service Provision in Romania," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 1108-1123, November.
    19. Sharma, Piyush & Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2020. "Impact of political connections on Chinese export firms' performance – Lessons for other emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 24-34.
    20. Cristina M. Campos-Alba & Emilio J. De la Higuera-Molina & Gemma Pérez-López & José L. Zafra-Gómez, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Public and Private Delivery Forms: An Application to the Waste Collection Service Using Order-M Data Panel Frontier Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:14586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.