IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Matriculación de minorías en universidades públicas de selectividad diversa, bajo distintos regímenes de admisión: El caso de Texas

Listed author(s):
  • Mariana Alfonso
  • Juan Carlos Calcagno
Registered author(s):

    Este estudio describe cómo las probabilidades de matriculación de minorías cambian ante modificaciones enpolíticas de admisión (de acción afirmativa a sólo mérito y a planes de porcentajes) cuando la composición demográfica de los potencialesestudiantes tambiénestá cambiando. El estudio utiliza cambios en políticas de admisión que ocurrieron en Texas con las decisiones de Hopwood y HB588 y una base de datos administrativos que incluye postulantes yestudiantes admitidos y matriculados en tres universidades públicas de distinto nivel de selectividad. Los resultados sugieren que la eliminación de acción afirmativa y la introducción del programa Top 10% tuvo efectos diferenciales, que dependen del nivel de selectividad de la universidad, en las probabilidades de matriculación y de postulaciónde minorías. Específicamente, Hopwood se relaciona con movimientos de minorías desde universidades selectivas hacia menos selectivascomo lo anticipa la hipótesis de cascada. A pesar de que el programa Top 10% aparentemente ayudó a que la probabilidad de matriculación de minorías aumente en la universidad selectiva como lo predice la hipótesis de mejora, una vez que tenemos en cuenta losaumentos en la participación de minorías entre los graduados de secundaria encontramos que el programa Top 10% ya no puede ser relacionado a mejoras en la representación de minorías en universidades selectivas. (Disponible en Inglés)

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department in its series Research Department Publications with number 4543.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Oct 2007
    Handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:4543
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1300 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20577

    Phone: 202-623-1000
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. David Card & Alan B. Krueger, 2005. "Would the Elimination of Affirmative Action Affect Highly Qualified Minority Applicants? Evidence from California and Texas," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(3), pages 416-434, April.
    2. Dominic J. Brewer & Eric Eide & Ronald G. Ehrenberg, 1996. "Does It Pay To Attend An Elite Private College? Cross Cohort Evidence on the Effects of College Quality on Earnings," NBER Working Papers 5613, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Loury, Linda Datcher & Garman, David, 1995. "College Selectivity and Earnings," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(2), pages 289-308, April.
    4. Long, M.C.Mark C., 2004. "College applications and the effect of affirmative action," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1-2), pages 319-342.
    5. Arulampalam, W. & Robin A. Naylor & Jeremy P. Smith, 2002. "University of Warwick," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 9, Royal Economic Society.
    6. Dickson, Lisa M., 2006. "Does ending affirmative action in college admissions lower the percent of minority students applying to college?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 109-119, February.
    7. Kermit Daniel & Dan Black & Jeffery Smith, 1996. "College Quality and the Wages of Young Men," HEW 9604001, EconWPA.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:wpaper:4543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Monica Bazan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.