Gender Differentials in Judicial Proceedings: Field Evidence from Housing-Related Cases in Uruguay
Using micro data on judicial proceedings in Uruguay, this paper presents evidence that female defendants receive more favorable treatment in courts than male defendants. This is due to longer foreclosure proceedings and higher probabilities of being granted extensions in evictions and dispossessions for female defendants.
|Date of creation:||Jan 2008|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 1300 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20577|
Web page: http://www.iadb.org/res
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Eduardo Gandelman & Néstor Gandelman, 2004.
"Los efectos del sector público en el financiamiento de la vivienda: el mercado hipotecario de Uruguay,"
IDB Publications (Working Papers)
7645, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Eduardo Gandelman & Nestor Gandelman, 2004. "Los efectos del sector público en el financiamiento de la vivienda: El mercado hipotecario de Uruguay," Research Department Publications 4358, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
- Kenneth L. Manning & Bruce A. Carroll & Robert A. Carp, 2004. "Does Age Matter? Judicial Decision Making in Age Discrimination Cases," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18.
- Helen F. Ladd, 1998. "Evidence on Discrimination in Mortgage Lending," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 41-62, Spring.
- Mustard, David B, 2001. "Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(1), pages 285-314, April. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)