IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/20-pb29.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

China's Agricultural Imports under the Phase One Deal: Is Success Possible?

Author

Abstract

This version updates the November 2020 version of CARD policy brief 20-PB 29 using monthly data until December 2020, weekly data until January 21, 2021, and daily export sales notices until January 29, 2021. We examine China's committed agricultural purchases under the phase one trade deal and whether it can fulfill those commitments. We review China's agricultural imports from the United States in 2020. We focus on corn, soybeans, cotton, sorghum, pork, beef, poultry, and ethanol. We also examine China's agricultural imports from non-US countries, compare the FOB and CIF prices of major agricultural commodities from the United States and its major competitors, and review tariffs charged on US products to understand the competitiveness of US agricultural exports to China. US monthly export data show China imported $27.3 billion worth of agricultural and related products from the United States in calendar year 2020, which is around 74.8% of the first-year trade deal obligation of $36.5 billion. US weekly export data until January 21, 2021, show that, overall, China's purchases of US corn, pork, beef, poultry, sorghum, and cotton are making good progress. Specifically, for corn, as of January 21, 2021, China had imported a record 2.11 million metric tons for the 2019/20 marketing year, 5.94 million metric tons for the 2020/21 marketing year to date, and has an outstanding 5.90 million metric tons for delivery in the 2020/21 marketing year. In addition, USDA's daily export sales report shows new corn sales to China of 1.36 million metric tons, 680,000 metric tons, 1.7 million metric tons, 2.108 million metric tons, and 596,000 metric tons on January 26, 27, 28, and 29, respectively, resulting in a minimum of 17.69 million metric tons in advanced sales for marketing year 2020/21, far exceeding the 357,500 metric tons for the 2017/18 marketing year. US weekly export data show that China has imported 16.26 million metric tons of US soybeans for the 2019/20 marketing year, 31.12 million metric tons for the 2020/21 marketing year to date, and has an outstanding 3.62 million metric tons for delivery in the 2020/21 marketing year. In addition, USDA's daily export sales report shows new soybean sales to China of 136,000, 132,000, and 132,000 metric tons on January 22, 27, and 29, respectively, resulting in a minimum 35.13 million metric tons of soybeans committed for delivery for the 2020/21 marketing year, exceeding the 27.68 million metric tons for the 2017/18 marketing year. For meat products, China imported a record 707,554 metric tons of US pork and 43,681 metric tons of US beef in the 2020 calendar year-much higher than the 56,208 metric tons of US pork and 2,089 metric tons of US beef in the full 2017 marketing year. Furthermore, China has ordered 124,444 metric tons of US pork and 33,379 metric tons of US beef for the 2021 marketing year as of January 21, 2021. The upward trend we find seems likely to continue due to China's strong demand for meat. China's corn imports from all sources reached 11.3 million metric tons in 2020 (GACC 2020), exceeding its corn tariff rate quota for the first time. Given that China has imported 5.94 million metric tons of US corn in the current marketing year, with an outstanding 11.75 million metric tons for delivery, as of January 29, 2021, China is also on track to far exceed its tariff rate quota in 2021. In the 2020 calendar year, China's total agricultural imports reached $170.8 billion, a 35.7% increase from the $125.8 billion in 2017. However, China sourced 84.8% of its agricultural imports from non-US sources in 2020, which, in part, reflects a continued diversification away from US agricultural imports before and during the trade war. Specifically, in 2020, China imported 55% of its corn from Ukraine and 64% of its soybeans from Brazil. However, China's record US corn booking in recent weeks indicates there is still a lot of room for US corn and soybean exports to China in the following months. While the United States accounted for 88% of China's sorghum imports in 2020, US meat products face strong competition from the EU, Brazil, Australia, and Argentina. In 2020, the EU accounted for 58% of China's pork imports, and Brazil, Australia, and Argentina accounted for 74% of China's beef imports. We use linear extrapolation that accounts for seasonality and trend to predict China's total US and non-US agricultural imports based on 2017 seasonal patterns and China's most recent US agricultural purchases, which includes advanced corn and soybeans sales until January 29, 2021. Specifically, we assume that the advanced corn and soybean sales will be delivered in the first year of the trade deal. We find that China is on track to import $35.8 billion in agricultural products from the United States in the first year of the trade deal if the ordered corn, soybeans, and ethanol are delivered on time (February 15, 2020, to February 14, 2021). We also analyze monthly FOB and CIF prices of China's agricultural imports from the United States and its major competitors and find that the FOB prices of US corn, soybeans, and pork are comparable to that of Ukraine corn, Brazil soybeans, and EU pork. However, the CIF prices of US corn and soybeans are higher than the CIF prices of Ukraine corn and Brazil soybeans due to higher transportation costs and retaliatory tariffs that China imposed on the United States. In addition, the recent depreciation of the Brazil real coupled with the strengthening of the US dollar significantly boosted the price competitiveness of Brazil soybeans. Due to the tariff exemptions since March 2020, the gap between US corn and soybeans and Ukraine corn and Brazil soybeans have been dwindling, creating more room for China to import US corn and soybeans in the following months. In addition, since the beginning of 2020, US pork CIF prices have been lower than those of EU pork, indicating that US pork is gaining competitiveness over EU pork. However, the FOB price of US beef is much higher than that of Brazil beef, in part because US beef is grain fed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi He & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang, 2021. "China's Agricultural Imports under the Phase One Deal: Is Success Possible?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-pb29, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:20-pb29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/20pb29.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=1303
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Carriquiry & Amani Elobeid & David A. Swenson & Dermot J. Hayes, 2020. "Impacts of African Swine Fever in Iowa and the United States," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-wp600, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    2. Minghao Li & Wendong Zhang & Dermot J. Hayes, 2018. "China's Agricultural Import Potential," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 18-pb23, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Chad E. Hart & Dermot J. Hayes & Keri L. Jacobs & Lee L. Schulz & John M. Crespi, 2020. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Iowa's Corn, Soybean, Ethanol, Pork, and Beef Sectors," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 20-pb28, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Zhang, Wendong & Xiong, Tao, 2020. "The coronavirus will delay agricultural export surges promised in trade deal with China," ISU General Staff Papers 202003130700001773, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiong, Tao & Zhang, Wendong & Chen, Chen-Ti, 2021. "A Fortune from misfortune: Evidence from hog firms’ stock price responses to China’s African Swine Fever outbreaks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Li, Minghao & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2020. "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Lee L. Schulz & Chad Hart, 2020. "Is the US Agricultural Sector Recovering from COVID-19?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2020-3, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Chen-Ti Chen & John M. Crespi & Yongjie Ji, 2021. "The United States' Competitive Positions in Beef, Corn, Pork, Soy, and Wheat Exports: 1980-2019," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2021-3, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    5. Xi He & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang, 2020. "The Impact of Flooding on China's Agricultural Production and Food Security in 2020," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2020-4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Yulong Chen & Liyuan Ma & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "Minimum Wages and Rural and Urban Firm Entry and Exit," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2021-4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    7. Wendong Zhang, 2021. "The Case for Healthy U.S.‐China Agricultural Trade Relations despite Deglobalization Pressures," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 225-247, March.
    8. Chad Hart & Lee L. Schulz, 2021. "USDA Outlook for 2021 Shows Healthy Recovery," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2021-5, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. Xi He & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang, 2020. "Upheaval in China's Corn Market: Will China expand its Tariff Rate Quota for Corn?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2020-2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    10. GianCarlo Moschini & Yongjie Ji & Seungki Lee, 2021. "Corn Yields and Climate Change: The Innovation Challenge," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2021-1, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Katherine Harris-Lagoudakis, 2020. "Federal Food Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2020-1, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    12. Paulson, Nick & Janzen, Joe & Zulauf, Carl & Swanson, Krista & Schnitkey, Gary, 2022. "Revisiting Ukraine, Russia, and Agricultural Commodity Markets," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 12(27), February.
    13. Xi He & Dermot J. Hayes & Wendong Zhang, 2021. "Is China's Hog Rebuilding Complete? Reconciling Inventory and Price Data," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-winter-2021-2, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendong Zhang, 2021. "The Case for Healthy U.S.‐China Agricultural Trade Relations despite Deglobalization Pressures," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 225-247, March.
    2. Nesrein M. Hashem & Eman M. Hassanein & Jean-François Hocquette & Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes & Fayrouz A. Ahmed & Youssef A. Attia & Khalid A. Asiry, 2021. "Agro-Livestock Farming System Sustainability during the COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Padilla, Samantha & Schulz, Lee L & Vaiknoras, Kate & MacLachlan, Matthew, 2021. "COVID-19 Working Paper: Changes in Regional Hog Slaughter During COVID-19," Administrative Publications 327340, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Xiong, Tao & Zhang, Wendong & Chen, Chen-Ti, 2021. "A Fortune from misfortune: Evidence from hog firms’ stock price responses to China’s African Swine Fever outbreaks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Nieyan Cheng & Wendong Zhang & Tao Xiong, 2022. "The Impact of China's Place-based Environmental Regulations on its Hog Industry: A Synthetic Difference-in-differences Approach," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 21-wp619, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Cho, Seung Jin & Lee, Jun Yeong & Winters, John V., 2020. "COVID-19 Employment Status Impacts on Food Sector Workers," ISU General Staff Papers 202006080700001107, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Tougeron, Kévin & Hance, Thierry, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on apple orchards in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Serge Savary & Sonia Akter & Conny Almekinders & Jody Harris & Lise Korsten & Reimund Rötter & Stephen Waddington & Derrill Watson, 2020. "Mapping disruption and resilience mechanisms in food systems," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 695-717, August.
    9. Qifeng Yang & Pingyu Zhang & Yuxin Li & Jiachen Ning & Nanchen Chu, 2023. "Does the Policy of Decoupled Subsidies Improve the Agricultural Economic Resilience?—Evidence from China’s Main Corn Producing Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Mindy L. Mallory, 2021. "Impact of COVID‐19 on Medium‐Term Export Prospects for Soybeans, Corn, Beef, Pork, and Poultry," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 292-303, March.
    11. Tamás Mizik & Lajos Nagy & Zoltán Gabnai & Attila Bai, 2020. "The Major Driving Forces of the EU and US Ethanol Markets with Special Attention Paid to the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Tomas Baležentis & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Agnė Žičkienė & Artiom Volkov & Erika Ribašauskienė & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2021. "Policies for Rapid Mitigation of the Crisis’ Effects on Agricultural Supply Chains: A Multi-Criteria Decision Support System with Monte Carlo Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Rohitash Chandra & Yixuan He, 2021. "Bayesian neural networks for stock price forecasting before and during COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-32, July.
    14. Padilla, Samantha L. & Schulz, Lee & Schulz, Lee L. & Vaiknoras, Kate & MacLachlan, Matthew J., 2022. "COVID-19 Working Paper: Changes in Regional Hog Slaughter During COVID-19," ISU General Staff Papers 202202231802330000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Schmitz Andrew & Moss Charles B. & Schmitz Troy G., 2020. "The Economic Effects of COVID-19 on the Producers of Ethanol, Corn, Gasoline, and Oil," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:20-pb29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.