IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2016_013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrated maritime bunker management with stochastic fuel prices and new emission regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Yewen

    (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)

  • Wallace, Stein W.

    (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)

  • Wang, Xin

    (Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Maritime bunker management (MBM) controls the procurement and consumption of the fuels used on board and therefore manages one of the most important cost drivers in the shipping industry. At the operational level, a shipping company needs to manage its fuel consumption by making optimal routing and speed decisions for each voyage. But since fuel prices are highly volatile, a shipping company sometimes also needs to do tactical fuel hedging in the forward market to control risk and cost volatility. From an operations research perspective, it is customary to think of tactical and operational decisions as tightly linked. However, the existing literature on MBM normally focuses on only one of these two levels, rather than taking an integrated point of view. This is in line with how shipping companies operate; tactical and operational bunker management decisions are made in isolation. We develop a stochastic programming model involving both tactical and operational decisions in MBM in order to minimize the total expected fuel costs, controlled for financial risk, within a planning period. This paper points out that after the latest regulation of the Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECA) came into force in 2015, an integration of the tactical and operational levels in MBM has become important for shipping companies whose business deals with SECA. The results of the computational study shows isolated decision making on either tactical or operational level in MBM will lead to various problem. Nevertheless, the most server consequence occurs when tactical decisions are made in isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Yewen & Wallace, Stein W. & Wang, Xin, 2016. "Integrated maritime bunker management with stochastic fuel prices and new emission regulations," Discussion Papers 2016/13, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2401601
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindstad, Haakon & Asbjørnslett, Bjørn E. & Strømman, Anders H., 2011. "Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3456-3464, June.
    2. Ghosh, Sugoutam & Lee, Loo Hay & Ng, Szu Hui, 2015. "Bunkering decisions for a shipping liner in an uncertain environment with service contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 792-802.
    3. Jun Xia & Kevin X. Li & Hong Ma & Zhou Xu, 2015. "Joint Planning of Fleet Deployment, Speed Optimization, and Cargo Allocation for Liner Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 922-938, November.
    4. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2013. "Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-62.
    5. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Robust bunker management for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 789-797.
    6. Amir Alizadeh & Manolis Kavussanos & David Menachof, 2004. "Hedging against bunker price fluctuations using petroleum futures contracts: constant versus time-varying hedge ratios," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 1337-1353.
    7. Mr. Noureddine Krichene, 2008. "Crude Oil Prices: Trends and Forecast," IMF Working Papers 2008/133, International Monetary Fund.
    8. K Fagerholt & G Laporte & I Norstad, 2010. "Reducing fuel emissions by optimizing speed on shipping routes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(3), pages 523-529, March.
    9. Pedrielli, Giulia & Lee, Loo Hay & Ng, Szu Hui, 2015. "Optimal bunkering contract in a buyer–seller supply chain under price and consumption uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 77-94.
    10. D Ronen, 2011. "The effect of oil price on containership speed and fleet size," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(1), pages 211-216, January.
    11. Prodhon, Caroline & Prins, Christian, 2014. "A survey of recent research on location-routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 1-17.
    12. Christian Edinger Munk Plum & Peter Neergaard Jensen & David Pisinger, 2014. "Bunker purchasing with contracts," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 16(4), pages 418-435, December.
    13. Xiaoyu Wang & Chee-Chong Teo, 2013. "Integrated hedging and network planning for container shipping's bunker fuel management," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(2), pages 172-196, June.
    14. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 701-714.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yewen Gu & Stein W. Wallace & Xin Wang, 2017. "The Impact of Bunker Risk Management on CO2 Emissions in Maritime Transportation Under ECA Regulation," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Didem Cinar & Konstantinos Gakis & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Sustainable Logistics and Transportation, pages 199-224, Springer.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yewen Gu & Stein W. Wallace & Xin Wang, 2017. "The Impact of Bunker Risk Management on CO2 Emissions in Maritime Transportation Under ECA Regulation," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Didem Cinar & Konstantinos Gakis & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Sustainable Logistics and Transportation, pages 199-224, Springer.
    2. Tan, Roy & Duru, Okan & Thepsithar, Prapisala, 2020. "Assessment of relative fuel cost for dual fuel marine engines along major Asian container shipping routes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. De, Arijit & Choudhary, Alok & Turkay, Metin & Tiwari, Manoj K., 2021. "Bunkering policies for a fuel bunker management problem for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 927-939.
    4. He, Qie & Zhang, Xiaochen & Nip, Kameng, 2017. "Speed optimization over a path with heterogeneous arc costs," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 198-214.
    5. Asghari, Mohammad & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J., 2023. "Coordinating vessel recovery actions: Analysis of disruption management in a liner shipping service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 627-644.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo & Yang, Ying, 2015. "Estimation of the perceived value of transit time for containerized cargoes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 298-308.
    7. Yan, Ran & Wang, Shuaian & Du, Yuquan, 2020. "Development of a two-stage ship fuel consumption prediction and reduction model for a dry bulk ship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Zhen, Lu & Wang, Shuaian & Zhuge, Dan, 2017. "Dynamic programming for optimal ship refueling decision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 63-74.
    9. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    10. Aydin, N. & Lee, H. & Mansouri, S.A., 2017. "Speed optimization and bunkering in liner shipping in the presence of uncertain service times and time windows at ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 143-154.
    11. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2015. "Robust bunker management for liner shipping networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 789-797.
    12. Adland, Roar & Cariou, Pierre & Wolff, Francois-Charles, 2020. "Optimal ship speed and the cubic law revisited: Empirical evidence from an oil tanker fleet," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    13. Junayed Pasha & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Masoud Kavoosi & Olumide F. Abioye & Oluwatosin Theophilus & Hui Wang & Raphael Kampmann & Weihong Guo, 2020. "Holistic tactical-level planning in liner shipping: an exact optimization approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-35, December.
    14. Ali Cheaitou & Pierre Cariou, 2019. "Greening of maritime transportation: a multi-objective optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 501-525, February.
    15. Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan & Wang, Yadong, 2016. "Shipping log data based container ship fuel efficiency modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 207-229.
    16. Du, Yuquan & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Shuaian & Kuang, Haibo, 2019. "Two-phase optimal solutions for ship speed and trim optimization over a voyage using voyage report data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 88-114.
    17. Berit Dangaard Brouer & Christian Vad Karsten & David Pisinger, 2017. "Optimization in liner shipping," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-35, March.
    18. Berit Dangaard Brouer & Christian Vad Karsten & David Pisinger, 2018. "Optimization in liner shipping," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 205-236, December.
    19. Li, Chen & Qi, Xiangtong & Song, Dongping, 2016. "Real-time schedule recovery in liner shipping service with regular uncertainties and disruption events," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 762-788.
    20. Zhang, Abraham & Zheng, Zhichao & Teo, Chung-Piaw, 2022. "Schedule reliability in liner shipping timetable design: A convex programming approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 499-525.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Maritime bunker management; SECA; risk management; stochastic programming; fuel hedging; sailing behavior;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2016_013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.