IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-02104730.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comprendre l'économie collaborative et ses promesses à travers ses fondements théoriques

Author

Listed:
  • David Massé

    (SES - Département Sciences Economiques et Sociales - Télécom ParisTech, ECOGE - Economie Gestion - I3 SES - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation de Telecom Paris - Télécom ParisTech - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Simon Borel
  • Damien Demailly

    (IDDRI - Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Paris)

Abstract

Airbnb, blablacar, eBay… Ces plateformes qui transforment nos économies sont le sommet du vaste iceberg appelé « économie collaborative ». Ce concept encore flou est porté par un ensemble d'acteurs constitué d'essayistes à suc-cès, de militants associatifs et d'entrepreneurs du web. À ce concept sont associées de nombreuses promesses : les pratiques collaboratives seraient une réponse à la crise du modèle de croissance, à la crise environnementale, et un moyen de refonder le lien social et les solidarités collectives. RETOUR AUX FONDEMENTS THÉORIQUES L'étude des fondements théoriques de l'économie collaborative permet de comprendre et d'analyser les promesses dont elle est porteuse. Nous identifions et discutons ici trois champs théoriques centraux mobilisés par les promoteurs de l'économie collaborative : la mouvance du libre irrigue la réflexion sur l'économie collaborative en soulignant et promouvant un changement de posture du consommateur passif vers un « consomm'ac-teur » de cette économie, ce passage se matérialisant par un accès distri-bué et universel aux connaissances, aux compétences et aux ressources matérielles ; l'économie de la fonctionnalité éclaire ce qui est au coeur de l'économie collaborative : le passage d'une logique de propriété à une logique d'usage, qui ouvre la voie à nombre de promesses environnemen-tales ; l'économie du don illustre la rupture avec l'hégémonie de l'échange marchand, en y réintégrant la dimension de l'échange symbolique basé sur le donner, recevoir et rendre. UNE POSTURE CRITIQUE VIS-À-VIS DE CES PROMESSES RESTE NÉCESSAIRE La diversité des approches théoriques mobilisées permet d'expliquer la plu-ralité des définitions de l'économie collaborative, mais aussi la diversité des promesses dont elle est porteuse. Si ces dernières doivent être prises au sérieux, elles suscitent également et à juste titre de nombreuses réserves. Les acteurs de l'économie collaborative qui veulent les concrétiser ne peuvent donc se passer d'une analyse critique, tout comme les décideurs publics qui souhaitent accompagner la diffusion des pratiques collabora-tives. Les champs théoriques identifiés ici peuvent être mobilisés à cette fin.

Suggested Citation

  • David Massé & Simon Borel & Damien Demailly, 2015. "Comprendre l'économie collaborative et ses promesses à travers ses fondements théoriques," Working Papers hal-02104730, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02104730
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://telecom-paris.hal.science/hal-02104730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://telecom-paris.hal.science/hal-02104730/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry Chesbrough & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 2002. "The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 529-555, June.
    2. Gérald Gaglio & Jacques Lauriol & Christian Du Tertre, 2011. "L'économie de la fonctionnalité : une voie nouvelle vers un développement durable ?," Post-Print halshs-00738604, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon Borel & Valérie Guillard & Dominique Roux, 2016. "Ce qui circule entre nous en ligne," Post-Print hal-02022173, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    2. Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi & Silvia Vermicelli, 2022. "Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1269-1310, July.
    3. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    4. Gerrit Remane & Andre Hanelt & Jan F. Tesch & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2017. "The Business Model Pattern Database — A Tool For Systematic Business Model Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-61, January.
    5. Oseni, Musiliu O. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2017. "The prospects for smart energy prices: Observations from 50 years of residential pricing for fixed line telecoms and electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 150-160.
    6. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    8. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    9. Wenyao Zhang & Tugrul Daim & Qingpu Zhang, 2019. "Exploring the Multi-Phase Driven Process for Disruptive Business Model Innovation of E-Business Microcredit: a Multiple Case Study from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 590-617, June.
    10. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    11. Dotun Olaleye Faloye & Idowu Owoeye & Kunle Jayeola, 2021. "The Key Drivers of Business Model Innovation in Developing Countries’ Firms: Survey of Micro and Small Scale Enterprises in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(7), pages 148-157, July.
    12. Lehoux, P. & Daudelin, G. & Williams-Jones, B. & Denis, J.-L. & Longo, C., 2014. "How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1025-1038.
    13. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Xinya You, 2022. "Applying design thinking for business model innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Business Models To Meet The Challenges Of The Global Economy. A Literature Review," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 127-146, December.
    17. Sven M. Laudien & Birgit Daxböck, 2016. "The Influence Of The Industrial Internet Of Things On Business Model Design: A Qualitative-Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Leviäkangas, Pekka & Öörni, Risto, 2020. "From business models to value networks and business ecosystems – What does it mean for the economics and governance of the transport system?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Ganesh Prasad Neupane, 2017. "Heuristics as an Aid to Inter-organizational Value Creation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 238-244.
    20. IonuÈ›-Claudiu Popa, 2019. "Competition in Air Transport Services in the Liberalized Market in Romania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 567-571, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02104730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.