IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Controle De Gestion, Capacites Dynamiques Et Strategies Emergentes Dans Les Organisations Entrepreneuriales : La Conception D'Un Balanced-Scorecard Comme « Levier De Controle Interactif »

  • Laurence Lehmann-Ortega

    (CEROM - Centre d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Organisations et le Management - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • Gérald Naro

    (ERFI – ISEM - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1)

Registered author(s):

    Cette communication porte sur la problématique du contrôle de gestion dans le contexte d'organisations entrepreneuriales confrontées au dilemme exploitation/exploration (March, 1991). Elle s'appuie sur l'étude de cas d'une entreprise entrepreneuriale. Il s'agissait de concevoir un Balanced Scorecard (BSC), en vue d'expérimenter la mise en place d'un système de contrôle de gestion ambidextre, fondée sur le modèle des leviers de contrôle développé par Simons (1995). Simons (1995) suggère ainsi la possibilité d'un partage des systèmes de contrôle entre, d'une part, l'activation de leviers de contrôle diagnostic, permettant de gérer les situations relevant de l'exploitation, en contrôlant la mise en oeuvre et les résultats des stratégies délibérées et, d'autre part, l'utilisation de leviers de contrôle interactifs, favorisant la formation des stratégies émergentes, dans une logique d'exploration. Le BSC est expérimenté dans une approche interactive. L'article repose sur l'idée selon laquelle l'aptitude du management à développer un contrôle interactif et, au-delà, un contrôle ambidextre, procède des capacités dynamiques de la firme.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-00525411.

    in new window

    Date of creation: May 2008
    Publication status: Published in LA COMPTABILITE, LE CONTRÔLE ET L'AUDIT ENTRE CHANGEMENT ET STABILITE, May 2008, France. pp.CD Rom, 2008
    Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525411
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Sarasvathy, Saras D. & Dew, Nicholas, 2005. "Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 385-406, December.
    2. James G. March, 1978. "Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 587-608, Autumn.
    3. Widener, Sally K., 2007. "An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 757-788.
    4. Marion Soulerot & Anne-Laure Farjaudon, 2007. "Les implications du dilemme exploitation/exploration sur le contrôle de gestion: le cas d'une entreprise de produits de grande consommation," Post-Print halshs-00150482, HAL.
    5. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael, 2007. "Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma," Research Papers 1963, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    6. O. De La Villarmois & O. Stephan, 2005. "Quand l'outil de diagnostic devient interactif," Post-Print hal-00185018, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00525411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.