IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05568670.html

Beyond ‘Not in my electoral Year’: Why do some elected officials oppose renewable energy projects?

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Delcayre

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

  • Sébastien Bourdin

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the reasons behind the wait-and-see and resistant attitudes of local elected officials regarding energy transition projects. Although there is consensus on the importance of renewable energy in combating climate change, its implementation at the local level often encounters opposition from several actors, including elected officials. This study identified the internal, external, and personal factors that influence this opposition by conducting semi-structured interviews with the French officials and stakeholders involved in the energy transition and by analysing the local and regional press. Our findings indicate that political strategies, regulatory complexities, and personal beliefs play significant roles in shaping officials' decisions regarding energy transition projects. Furthermore, by proposing a typology of elected officials according to their modes of opposition, we offer insights to promote effective and sustainable local energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Delcayre & Sébastien Bourdin, 2025. "Beyond ‘Not in my electoral Year’: Why do some elected officials oppose renewable energy projects?," Post-Print hal-05568670, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05568670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102998
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05568670v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05568670v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-05089174 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hübner, Gundula & Leschinger, Valentin & Müller, Florian J.Y. & Pohl, Johannes, 2023. "Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Kevin Arceneaux, 2012. "Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 271-285, April.
    4. Bob Jessop, 2001. "Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic – Relational Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(7), pages 1213-1235, July.
    5. Allan Dale & Karen Vella & Sarah Ryan & Kathleen Broderick & Rosemary Hill & Ruth Potts & Tom Brewer, 2020. "Governing Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Australia: International Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    7. Lorraine Whitmarsh, 2008. "Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 351-374, April.
    8. Gavin Bridge & Ludger Gailing, 2020. "New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1037-1050, September.
    9. Faguet, Jean-Paul, 2014. "Decentralization and Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 2-13.
    10. Shane Fudge & Michael Peters, 2011. "Behaviour Change in the UK Climate Debate: An Assessment of Responsibility, Agency and Political Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    12. Bourdin, Sébastien & Jacquet, Nicolas, 2025. "Closing the loop at the local scale: Investigating the drivers of and barriers to the implementation of the circular economy in cities and regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    13. Kern, Kristine & Eckersley, Peter & Haupt, Wolfgang, 2023. "Diffusion and upscaling of municipal climate mitigation and adaptation strategies in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 1-12.
    14. André Torre & Sebastien Bourdin, 2023. "The French Territorial Reform of the Regions: Objectives, Risks and Challenges for some Forgotten Territories," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 761-772, August.
    15. Axsen, Jonn & Wolinetz, Michael, 2021. "Taxes, tolls and ZEV zones for climate: Synthesizing insights on effectiveness, efficiency, equity, acceptability and implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Marco Segreto & Lucas Principe & Alexandra Desormeaux & Marco Torre & Laura Tomassetti & Patrizio Tratzi & Valerio Paolini & Francesco Petracchini, 2020. "Trends in Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Across Europe—A Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Matthew J. Hornsey & Emily A. Harris & Paul G. Bain & Kelly S. Fielding, 2016. "Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(6), pages 622-626, June.
    18. Faulques, Martin & Bonnet, Jean & Bourdin, Sébastien & Juge, Marine & Pigeon, Jonas & Richard, Charlotte, 2022. "Generational effect and territorial distributive justice, the two main drivers for willingness to pay for renewable energies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Peter Newell & Andrew Simms, 2021. "How Did We Do That? Histories and Political Economies of Rapid and Just Transitions," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 907-922, November.
    20. Ross Gillard & Andrew Gouldson & Jouni Paavola & James Van Alstine, 2016. "Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 251-265, March.
    21. Sébastien Bourdin & Nicolas Jacquet, 2025. "Closing the loop at the local scale: Investigating the drivers of and barriers to the implementation of the circular economy in cities and regions," Post-Print hal-04991196, HAL.
    22. Sébastien Bourdin, 2024. "The Interplay of Politics and Space: How Elected Politicians Shape Place-based Policies and Outcomes," Post-Print hal-04852229, HAL.
    23. Julie Battilana & Bernard Leca & Eva Boxenbaum, 2009. "How actors change institutions : Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-00576509, HAL.
    24. Matthew J. Hornsey & Stephan Lewandowsky, 2022. "A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1454-1464, November.
    25. Brita Hermelin & Sara Gustafsson, 2024. "A local governance initiative for climate mitigation: the place-leading role of local government," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 599-613, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markku Sotarauta, 2017. "An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 584-599, June.
    2. Chedrak Chembessi & Christophe Beaurain & Geneviève Cloutier, 2025. "Towards an integrated strategic planning framework in the transition to a circular economy: lessons from local circular energy initiatives," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 685-720, September.
    3. Solomon Eghosa Uhunamure & Clement Matasane & Trevor Uyi Omoruyi & Julieanna Powell-Turner, 2025. "Determinants of Consumer Willingness to Invest in Green Energy Solutions: Perspectives from South Africa," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Sherrington, Chris & Bartley, Justin & Moran, Dominic, 2008. "Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2504-2512, July.
    5. Odou, Philippe & Schill, Marie, 2020. "How anticipated emotions shape behavioral intentions to fight climate change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 243-253.
    6. Bourdin, Sébastien & Delcayre, Hugo, 2024. "Does size matter? The effects of biomethane project size on social acceptability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Sébastien Bourdin & Arsène Perrot, 2025. "Breaking free from the regional carbon trap: analysing the persistence of CO 2 emissions in EU regions," Post-Print hal-05376844, HAL.
    8. Booth, Pamela & Walsh, Patrick J. & Stahlmann-Brown, Pike, 2020. "Drought Intensity, Future Expectations, and the Resilience of Climate Beliefs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Gabriele Prati & Iana Tzankova & Cinzia Albanesi & Elvira Cicognani, 2022. "Longitudinal Predictors of Perceived Climate Change Importance and Worry among Italian Youths: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Claudia Freivogel & Vivianne H. M. Visschers, 2020. "Understanding the Underlying Psychosocial Determinants of Safe Food Handling among Consumers to Mitigate the Transmission Risk of Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Baddeley, M., 2011. "Energy, the Environment and Behaviour Change: A survey of insights from behavioural economics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1162, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Jeffery S. McMullen & Katrina M. Brownell & Joel Adams, 2021. "What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1197-1238, September.
    13. Goel, Pooja & Kumar, Aalok & Parayitam, Satyanarayana & Luthra, Sunil, 2023. "Understanding transport users' preferences for adopting electric vehicle based mobility for sustainable city: A moderated moderated-mediation model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Wakkee, Ingrid & van der Sijde, Peter & Vaupell, Christiaan & Ghuman, Karminder, 2019. "The university's role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 195-205.
    15. Brown, Pike & Walsh, Patrick & Booth, Pam, "undated". "Environmental signalling & expectations of future drought: Evidence from panel data," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305239, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Albert Moerkerken & Julia Blasch & Pieter Beukering & Erik Well, 2020. "A new approach to explain farmers’ adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 141-161, March.
    17. Llewelyn Hughes & David M. Konisky & Sandra Potter, 2020. "Extreme weather and climate opinion: evidence from Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 723-743, November.
    18. Bourdin, Sébastien & Jacquet, Nicolas, 2025. "Closing the loop at the local scale: Investigating the drivers of and barriers to the implementation of the circular economy in cities and regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    19. Beate Fischer & Gunnar Gutsche & Heike Wetzel, 2020. "Who wants to get involved? Determinants of citizens’ willingness to participate in German renewable energy cooperatives," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202027, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    20. Samuel Pearson & Matthew J. Hornsey & Saphira Rekker & Belinda Wade & Chris Greig, 2024. "Publicly expressed climate scepticism is greatest in regions with high CO2 emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(5), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05568670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.