IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05430064.html

Employee ownership and technological innovation: do worker cooperatives innovate?

Author

Listed:
  • Thibault Mirabel

    (Capital Collectif)

  • Aurélien Quignon

    (ICN Business School)

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between employee ownership and technological innovation. The impact of worker cooperatives' democratic governance on innovation is debated-some highlight financial constraints and slow decision-making as disadvantages, while others emphasize participatory structures and knowledge-sharing as advantages for innovation. Using a balanced panel of French worker cooperatives from 2014 to 2018, we find nuanced relationship: the share of worker-owners among workers positively influences innovation, whereas the share of worker-owners among owners negatively impacts innovation, providing empirical evidence for both the advantage and disadvantage hypotheses. Regional spillover effects also play a significant role. These findings challenge the notion that worker cooperatives are inherently less innovative than conventional firms and highlight the importance of ownership distribution and external conditions in shaping innovation outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Thibault Mirabel & Aurélien Quignon, 2025. "Employee ownership and technological innovation: do worker cooperatives innovate?," Post-Print hal-05430064, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05430064
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2025.2606148
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05430064v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05430064v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2025.2606148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 163-184, Summer.
    2. Gallego-Bono, Juan Ramón & Chaves-Avila, Rafael, 2016. "Innovation cooperative systems and structural change: An evolutionary analysis of Anecoop and Mondragon cases," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4907-4911.
    3. Dorner, Matthias & Harhoff, Dietmar, 2018. "A novel technology-industry concordance table based on linked inventor-establishment data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 768-781.
    4. Imanol BASTERRETXEA & Ricardo MARTÍNEZ, 2012. "Impact Of Management And Innovation Capabilities On Performance: Are Cooperatives Different?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(3), pages 357-381, September.
    5. Casanueva, Cristóbal & Castro, Ignacio & Galán, José L., 2013. "Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 603-613.
    6. Cohen, Wesley M., 2010. "Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 129-213, Elsevier.
    7. Trevor Young-Hyman & Mariangélica Martínez Chávez, 2015. "Formal Organizational Power and Innovation: From a Principal-Agent to an Institutionalist View," Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, in: Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory & Labor-Managed Firms, volume 16, pages 143-172, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Smith, Stephen C., 1994. "Innovation and market strategy in Italian industrial cooperatives: Econometric evidence on organizational comparative advantage," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 303-320, May.
    9. Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen & Heidi Williams, 2019. "A toolkit of policies to promote innovation," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 10.
    10. Philippe Aghion & John Van Reenen & Luigi Zingales, 2013. "Innovation and Institutional Ownership," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 277-304, February.
    11. Nathalie Magne & Fathi Fakhfakh & Virginie Pérotin & Thibault Mirabel, 2022. "Employee-Owned Firms in France," Post-Print halshs-03942675, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Contigiani, Andrea & Testoni, Marco, 2023. "Geographic isolation, trade secrecy, and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    3. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Ruiyang Hu & Chen Yin & Zhijie Zheng & Sili Zhou, 2024. "Unlocking Innovation: The Impact of Free Trade Zones on Corporate Innovation in China," Working Papers 202414, University of Macau, Faculty of Business Administration.
    5. Sarah Armitage & Noël Bakhtian & Adam Jaffe, 2024. "Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 4-48.
    6. Fernando Alexandre & Miguel Chaves & Miguel Portela, 2025. "Investment grants and firms’ productivity: how effective is a grant booster shot?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 1601-1641, April.
    7. Hötte, Kerstin, 2023. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and the direction of technological change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    8. He, Yiqing & Ding, Xin & Yang, Chuchu, 2021. "Do environmental regulations and financial constraints stimulate corporate technological innovation? Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Jason Potts & Andrew Torrance & Dietmar Harhoff & Eric von Hippel, 2024. "Profiting from Data Commons: Theory, Evidence, and Strategy Implications," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Cátia Rosário & Celeste Varum & Anabela Botelho, 2024. "The Role of Public Incentives in Promoting Innovation: An Analysis of Recurrently Supported Companies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Xu, Maobin & Liu, Yi & Wu, Kai, 2025. "The power of title: Unintended consequences of a place-based innovation policy in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Martin Beraja & David Y Yang & Noam Yuchtman, 2023. "Data-intensive Innovation and the State: Evidence from AI Firms in China," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(4), pages 1701-1723.
    13. Yang, Xiaoyin & Zhang, Xinmin & Zang, Hong & Chu, Hongcong & Feng, Chao, 2025. "From shadows to spotlight: How big data bureaus unveil corporate R&D gaming?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PG).
    14. Dhami, Sanjit & Zeppini, Paolo, 2025. "Green technology adoption under uncertainty, increasing returns, and complex adaptive dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Joseph Owuondo, 2023. "A Comparative Study of Entrepreneurial Education and Startup Ecosystems: United States vs. Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(10), pages 115-123, October.
    16. Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula, 2024. "Seven reasons why mission‐oriented innovation policies seldom work in practice," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 354-362, June.
    17. Gianluca Biggi & Martina Iori & Julia Mazzei & Andrea Mina, 2025. "Green intelligence: the AI content of green technologies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(3), pages 803-840, September.
    18. Cristina CRISTE & Ciel BOVARY (MAN) & Nicoleta-Claudia MOLDOVAN & Raluca RĂCĂTĂIAN & Oana-Ramona LOBONȚ, 2024. "Eu Capacity To Bolster And Stimulate Research And Innovation: Who Is The Leader In Development?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 19(2), pages 60-77, August.
    19. Long, Xianling & Wang, Zhiqiang, 2025. "From heat to high-tech: How innovation responds to climate change," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Gianluca Pallante & Emanuele Russo & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Does mission-oriented funding stimulate private R&D? Evidence from military R&D for US states," Working Papers hal-04097530, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05430064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.