IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05078258.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Literacy In Electronic Banking: A Key To Employee Well-Being
[La Littératie Numérique dans la Banque Électronique : Un Levier Essentiel du Bien-Être des Employés]

Author

Listed:
  • Jalal Moustakim

    (FSJES - Faculty of Legal, Economic, and Social Sciences of Fes, USMBA - Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah [Fès])

  • Mohammed Baaddi

    (USMBA - Université Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah [Fès], FSJES - Faculty of Legal, Economic, and Social Sciences of Fes)

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of digital literacy on employee well-being in the banking sector. Introducing the Digital Literacy Empowerment and Well-being Model (DLEW Model), with psychological empowerment and self-efficacy as mediating variables, and technostress and organizational support as moderators. This study synthesizes existing literature in digital literacy and employee well-being. Theories like Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), and the Job Characteristics Model (JCM) are used. The DLEW Model is used to explain and facilitate the proposed relationships between variables. This model shows that digital literacy enhances employee well-being through a solid psychological empowerment and self-efficacy. Technostress, the stress people feel when using or adopting with new tech, is proposed as moderator variable, to moderate the relationship between digital literacy and psychological empowerment. A factor that might weaken the positive push that digital literacy gives to psychological empowerment. On the other hand, if employees feel the presence of their organizational support, it can be stronger the link between digital literacy and self-efficacy. So, in short, less stress and more support means better digital skill and well-being. Since The DLEW Model is still theoretical, it's important for future research to put it to the test in different types of organizations and industries. We need to know the validity of these propositions and its applicability across various workplace situations. Unlike existing literature, the study makes a unique contribution by proposing a comprehensive theoretical framework, the DLEW Model shows the crucial role of digital literacy in shaping employee well-being and performance. It provides groundwork for future empirical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalal Moustakim & Mohammed Baaddi, 2025. "Digital Literacy In Electronic Banking: A Key To Employee Well-Being [La Littératie Numérique dans la Banque Électronique : Un Levier Essentiel du Bien-Être des Employés]," Post-Print hal-05078258, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05078258
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15381283
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05078258v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05078258v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.15381283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Zoonen, Ward & Verhoeven, Joost W.M. & Vliegenthart, Rens, 2017. "Understanding the consequences of public social media use for work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 595-605.
    2. Hussin J. Hejase & Ali El Dirani & Zeinab Haidar & Latifa Alawieh & Zahraa A. Ahmad & Nada Sfeir, 2024. "The Impact of Employee Well-Being on Organizational Effectiveness: Context of Lebanon," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 14(2), pages 1554-1554, December.
    3. Erik Brynjolfsson & Tom Mitchell & Daniel Rock, 2018. "What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 43-47, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    3. Enrico Maria Fenoaltea & Dario Mazzilli & Aurelio Patelli & Angelica Sbardella & Andrea Tacchella & Andrea Zaccaria & Marco Trombetti & Luciano Pietronero, 2024. "Follow the money: a startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries and regions," Papers 2412.04924, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    4. Gordon H. Hanson, 2021. "Immigration and Regional Specialization in AI," NBER Working Papers 28671, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Cao, Sean & Jiang, Wei & Wang, Junbo & Yang, Baozhong, 2024. "From Man vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The art and AI of stock analyses," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Jeffrey L. Furman & Florenta Teodoridis, 2020. "Automation, Research Technology, and Researchers’ Trajectories: Evidence from Computer Science and Electrical Engineering," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 330-354, March.
    7. Ehsan Valavi & Joel Hestness & Newsha Ardalani & Marco Iansiti, 2022. "Time and the Value of Data," Papers 2203.09118, arXiv.org.
    8. Andrea Szalavetz, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Development Strategy in Dependent Market Economies - Any Room amidst Big Power Rivalry?," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 40-54.
    9. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & Jonathon Hazell & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "AI and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies," NBER Working Papers 28257, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2021. "Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 548-563.
    11. Baccarella, Christian V. & Wagner, Timm F. & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian P., 2018. "Social media? It's serious! Understanding the dark side of social media," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 431-438.
    12. Nilesh Saraf & Pratyush Bharati & T. Ravichandran, 2023. "Does Social Capital Arise from Enterprise or Public Social Media Use? A Model of Social Media Antecedents and Consequences," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2353-2375, December.
    13. Songul Tolan & Annarosa Pesole & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & José Hernandez-Orallo & Emilia Gomez, 2020. "Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2020-02, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Zuazu-Bermejo, Izaskun, 2022. "Robots and women in manufacturing employment," ifso working paper series 19, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:851-874 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Aksoy, Cevat Giray & Özcan, Berkay & Philipp, Julia, 2021. "Robots and the gender pay gap in Europe," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Jens Prüfer & Patricia Prüfer, 2020. "Data science for entrepreneurship research: studying demand dynamics for entrepreneurial skills in the Netherlands," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 651-672, October.
    18. David Autor & Caroline Chin & Anna Salomons & Bryan Seegmiller, 2024. "New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(3), pages 1399-1465.
    19. Huseynov, Samir, 2025. "ChatGPT and the labor market: Unraveling the effect of AI discussions on students’ earning expectations," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Lucrezia Fanti & Dario Guarascio & Massimo Moggi, 2020. "The development of AI and its impact on business models, organization and work," LEM Papers Series 2020/25, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    21. Guarascio, Dario & Reljic, Jelena & Stöllinger, Roman, 2025. "Diverging paths: AI exposure and employment across European regions," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 11-24.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05078258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.