IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04110803.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Japan’s Corporate Governance Transformation: Convergence or Reconfiguration? », Administrative sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Theo Renou

    (UNISTRA FSEG - Université de Strasbourg - Faculté des sciences économiques et de gestion - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg)

  • René Carrraz

    (UTokyo - The University of Tokyo)

  • Thierry Burger-Helmchen

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Japanese firms have historically followed a country-specific model of corporate governance. Yet, Japan has had to adapt its corporate model over the last 30 years, along with the transformation of distinctive characteristics of Japanese capitalism in the same period. We review the historical evolution of Japanese corporate governance over the last three decades with a specific emphasis on the changes in the capital structure of major companies and the efforts to correct ineffective board of directors monitoring. By doing this, we investigate to what extent specific Japanese corporate governance features may explain the nation's economic situation over this period. Thereby, we try to clarify the influences that have presided over recent corporate governance reforms in Japan despite the existence of managerial failures and corporate scandals. This paper places itself into the debate over the diversity of capitalism as it portrays the specificities, differences, and converging trends of Japanese corporate governance practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Theo Renou & René Carrraz & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2023. "Japan’s Corporate Governance Transformation: Convergence or Reconfiguration? », Administrative sciences," Post-Print hal-04110803, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04110803
    DOI: 10.3390/admsci13060141
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04110803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04110803/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3390/admsci13060141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Yves Le Corre & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2022. "Managerial Control in an Online Constructivist Learning Environment: A Teacher’s Perspective," Post-Print hal-03806698, HAL.
    2. Numata, Shingo & Takeda, Fumiko, 2010. "Stock market reactions to audit failure in Japan: The case of Kanebo and ChuoAoyama," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 175-199, June.
    3. Fabien Guimtrandy & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2022. "The Pitch: Some Face-to-Face Minutes to Build Trust," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Qi Luo & Toyohiko Hachiya, 2005. "Corporate Governance, Cash Holdings, and Firm Value: Evidence from Japan," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 613-636.
    5. Masaru Yoshimori, 2005. "Does Corporate Governance Matter? Why the Corporate Performance of Toyota and Canon is Superior to GM and Xerox," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 447-457, May.
    6. Limpaphayom, Piman & Rogers, Daniel A. & Yanase, Noriyoshi, 2019. "Bank equity ownership and corporate hedging: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 765-783.
    7. Dorothee Feils & Manzur Rahman & Florin Şabac, 2018. "Corporate Governance Systems Diversity: A Coasian Perspective on Stakeholder Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 451-466, June.
    8. Shinu Vig & Manipadma Datta, 2018. "Reviewing and revisiting the use of corporate governance indices," International Journal of Corporate Governance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 227-241.
    9. Ariyoshi Okumura, 2004. "A Japanese View on Corporate Governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 3-4, January.
    10. Neukam, Marion & Bollinger, Sophie, 2022. "Encouraging creative teams to integrate a sustainable approach to technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 354-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theo Renou & René Carraz & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2023. "Japan’s Corporate Governance Transformation: Convergence or Reconfiguration?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Naiwei Chen & Meiya Chang, 2013. "Financial Crisis and Corporate Liquidity: Implications for Emerging Markets," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Stavros E. Arvanitis & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos & Dimitris Terzakis, 2018. "Is There a Non-linear Relationship of Market Value with Cash and Ownership?," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(1), pages 3-25, January-M.
    4. Godfred A. Bokpin & Zangina Isshaq & Francis Aboagye‐Otchere, 2011. "Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate liquidity policy," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(3), pages 262-279, August.
    5. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Marwa Elnahass & Kamil Omoteso & Aly Salama & Vu Quang Trinh, 2020. "Differential market valuations of board busyness across alternative banking models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 201-238, July.
    7. Windsor, Duane, 2009. "Tightening corporate governance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 306-316, September.
    8. Ye, Kangtao & Cheng, Yingli & Gao, Jingyu, 2014. "How individual auditor characteristics impact the likelihood of audit failure: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 394-401.
    9. Aryestantya Fikri Dewanta & Johan Arifin, 2020. "Corporate Risk-Taking Behaviour: Corporate Governance Perspective," Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Master in Accounting Program, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, vol. 2(1), pages 1, May.
    10. Ito, Tadashi & Ryan, Michael & Tanaka, Ayumu, 2023. "Partial ownership, financial constraint, and FDI," SocArXiv 9djup, Center for Open Science.
    11. Stavros E. Arvanitis & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos & Maria Chatzimarkaki, 2017. "Cash and Ownership on Firms Market Value: Evidence from Greek Panel Data," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 70-91.
    12. Ernest Ezeani & Rami Salem & Frank Kwabi & Khalid Boutaine & Bilal & Bushra Komal, 2022. "Board monitoring and capital structure dynamics: evidence from bank-based economies," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 473-498, February.
    13. Gupta, C.P. & Bedi, Prateek, 2020. "Corporate cash holdings and promoter ownership," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    14. Mitsuru Mizuno & Isaac T. Tabner, 2009. "Corporate Governance In Japan And The Uk: Codes, Theory And Practice," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 622-638, December.
    15. Kam-Wah Lai & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2021. "Do failed auditors receive lower audit fees from continuing engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1190, April.
    16. Chowdhury, Shamsud D., 2014. "Strategic roads that diverge or converge: GM and Toyota in the battle for the top," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 127-136.
    17. Yu, Chih-Ping, 2015. "Financial policies on firm performance: The U.S. insurance industry before and after the global financial crisis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 391-402.
    18. Zero Deng & J. Jimmy Yang, 2023. "Corporate reputation and hedging activities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S1), pages 1223-1247, April.
    19. Hai-Chin Yu & Ben Sopranzetti & Cheng-Few Lee, 2015. "The impact of banking relationships, managerial incentives, and board monitoring on corporate cash holdings: an emerging market perspective," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 353-378, February.
    20. Shan, Yuan George & Troshani, Indrit & Richardson, Grant, 2015. "An empirical comparison of the effect of XBRL on audit fees in the US and Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 89-103.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governance; Evolution; Japan; History; Corporate scandals;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04110803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.