IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01594136.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The EC and US agricultural trade conflict and the GATT round : petty multilateralism

Author

Listed:
  • Hervé Guyomard

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Louis Pascal Mahe

    (Unité d'économie et sociologie rurales de rennes - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Terry L. Roe

    (UMN - University of Minnesota System)

Abstract

Cet article examine dans quelle mesure le compromis Dunkel et l'accord bilatéral CEE-USA de Washington sont compatibles avec la réforme de la PAC et le Farm Bill américain. Le contexte économique et politique de l'Uruguay Round est analysé, afin de justifier le contenu de ce que serait un accord final. Ce dernier devrait être centré sur les politiques commerciales, et plus particulièrement sur la réduction des subventions aux exportations. Les engagements en terme de diminution du soutien interne seraient faibles de façon à minimiser les coûts politiques des ajustements dans les différentes parties contractantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hervé Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe, 1992. "The EC and US agricultural trade conflict and the GATT round : petty multilateralism," Post-Print hal-01594136, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594136
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01594136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01594136/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riethmuller, Paul & Roe, Terry, 1986. "Government intervention in commodity markets: The case of Japanese rice and wheat policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 327-349.
    2. Hervé Guyomard & Louis-Pascal Mahe, 1992. "Le projet Mac Sharry : facteurs de sensibilité du débouché céréalier communautaire," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 211(1), pages 20-29.
    3. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1992. "Le projet Mac Sharry : facteurs de sensibilité du débouché céréalier communautaire," Post-Print hal-01600180, HAL.
    4. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Louis Pascal Mahe & Hervé Guyomard, 1992. "The CAP and the GATT negotiation : between political economy and mercantilism ?," Post-Print hal-01594130, HAL.
    6. Mahe, Louis Adrien Pascal & Roe, Terry, 1992. "Political Economy Trade Negotiations: An Empirical Game Theory Analysis," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197894, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & K. J. Munk & T. L. Roe, 1993. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Ambitions And Realities," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 245-263, May.
    2. Scoppola, Margherita, 1995. "Multinationals and agricultural policy in the EC and USA," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sean A. Cahill, 1997. "Calculating The Rate Of Decoupling For Crops Under Cap/Oilseeds Reform," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 349-378, January.
    2. Hervé Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1993. "La réforme de la PAC (texte de mai 1992) évaluation à l'aide du modèle MISS," Working Papers hal-01594128, HAL.
    3. Mahe, L P & Tavera, C, 1988. "Bilateral Harmonization of EC and U.S. Agricultural Policies," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 15(4), pages 327-348.
    4. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Banerjee, Anurag N. & Gorter, Harry de, 2001. "Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection: An econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 25-43, October.
    5. Guyomard, Herve & Mahe, Louis Adrien Pascal & Roe, Terry L. & Tarditi, Secondo, 1993. "The Cap Reform And Ec-Us Relations: The Gatt As A "Cap" On The Cap," Working Papers 14432, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    6. Taniguchi, Kiyoshi, 2001. "A General Equilibrium Analysis Of Japanese Rice Market Trade Liberalization," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20660, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Vanzetti, David, 1996. "The next round: Game theory and public choice perspectives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4-5), pages 461-477.
    8. Marchant, Mary A. & Neff, Steven A. & Xiao, Mei, 1997. "Political Economy of United States and European Union Dairy Policy Choice," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198045, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. H. Alan Love & Endah Murniningtyas, 1992. "Measuring the Degree of Market Power Exerted by Government Trade Agencies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(3), pages 546-555.
    10. Coggins, Jay S., 1994. "Implementing Agricultural Policy Virtually: The Case of Set-Aside," Staff Papers 200579, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Duncan, John, 1989. "Government Intervention And Welfare: The Philippine Sugar Case," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270716, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Labson, B. Stephen & Rausser, Gordon C., 1992. "Modeling Phased Reduction of Distortionary Policies in the U.S. Wheat Market Under Alternative Macroeconomic Environments," Staff General Research Papers Archive 502, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la nouvelle PAC : la fin d'une exception ?," Post-Print hal-01593896, HAL.
    14. Jonathan Brooks, 1996. "Agricultural Policies In Oecd Countries: What Can We Learn From Political Economy Models?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 366-389, January.
    15. Kennedy, P. Lynn & von Witzke, Harald & Roe, Terry, 1997. "International Strategic Agricultural Trade Policy Interdependence and the Exchange Rate: A Game Theoretical Analysis," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198198, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Unknown, 1987. "Japanese agricultural policies: an overview," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316179, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    17. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Sachtler, Kay G., 1988. "An Econometric Analysis Of U.S. Sugar Import Quota And Target Price Choices," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270312, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. C. S. C. Sekhar, 2010. "Structure of the World Wheat Market: Some Implications for Strategic Trade Policy?," Journal of Quantitative Economics, The Indian Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 142-158.
    19. Julian Alston & Colin Carter, 1991. "Causes And Consequences Of Farm Policy," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 9(1), pages 107-121, January.
    20. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Sachtler, Kay G., 1989. "Politico-Economic Analysis of the US Sugar Programme," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197684, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01594136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.