IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/gsspwp/49.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A blue revolution in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Ghana’s tilapia value chain

Author

Listed:
  • Ragasa, Catherine
  • Andam, Kwaw S.
  • Kufoalor, Doreen S.
  • Amewu, Sena

Abstract

Global growth in aquaculture is underway – a “blue revolution†featuring rapid increases in demand for fish and a corresponding surge in aquaculture production. This paper describes the fast-growing tilapia value chain in Ghana to demonstrate the features of a nascent blue revolution in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and to illustrate its potential for job creation and reducing poverty and food insecurity there. Tilapia production has been growing at 15 percent annually in SSA, but imports are also surging to satisfy the growing appetite for tilapia. This paper illustrates how aquaculture can grow sustainably in SSA within the context of growing demand and global competition. A value chain analysis is conducted using secondary data analysis, desk reviews of experiences and lessons from other countries, interviews with 95 actors in the tilapia value chain in Ghana, and detailed production and profitability data from Ghanaian tilapia farmers. A profitable farmed tilapia industry has been established in Ghana with the potential to expand supply to satisfy local demand and to export to neighboring countries. Productivity in the industry has grown mainly through reducing the mortality rates of fingerlings and improvements in the supply of locally-produced high-quality fish feed. Feed costs remain high. However, there is potential to reduce those costs by improving the productivity of crops that are used in fish feed, particularly maize and soybean. Reducing local feed costs will have positive spillover effects on both other pond-based aquaculture systems and on the livestock feed sector. Moreover, Ghana can expand it fish feed production to be an important source of feed within SSA. The industry can further increase aquaculture productivity through the adoption of faster-growing fish strains and better management practices. Ghana’s aquaculture sector could grow even faster by adopting lessons from other countries, including on infrastructure provision, fiscal incentives for the production of fish feed ingredients, and sustainable fish farming practices, particularly through paying close attention to water and feed quality and addressing food safety concerns within the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragasa, Catherine & Andam, Kwaw S. & Kufoalor, Doreen S. & Amewu, Sena, 2018. "A blue revolution in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Ghana’s tilapia value chain," GSSP working papers 49, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146065
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 1950. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 479-480, August.
    2. Anonymous, 1950. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 313-314, May.
    3. Courbois, Claude & Delgado, Christopher L. & Ehui, Simeon K. & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Steinfeld, Henning, 1999. "Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution," 2020 vision briefs 61, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Eltholth, Mahmoud & Fornace, Kimberly & Grace, Delia & Rushton, Jonathan & Häsler, Barbara, 2015. "Characterisation of production, marketing and consumption patterns of farmed tilapia in the Nile Delta of Egypt," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 131-143.
    5. Brummett, Randall E. & Lazard, Jérôme & Moehl, John, 2008. "African aquaculture: Realizing the potential," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 371-385, October.
    6. Anonymous, 1950. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 126-128, February.
    7. Anonymous, 1950. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 671-672, November.
    8. Dey, Madan M. & Spielman, David J. & Haque, A.B.M.M. & Rahman, M.S. & Valmonte-Santos, R., 2013. "Change and diversity in smallholder rice–fish systems: Recent evidence and policy lessons from Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 108-117.
    9. Yaw B. Ansah & Emmanuel A. Frimpong & Eric M. Hallerman, 2014. "Genetically-Improved Tilapia Strains in Africa: Potential Benefits and Negative Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Georgina Milne & Andrew William Byrne & Emma Campbell & Jordon Graham & John McGrath & Raymond Kirke & Wilma McMaster & Jesko Zimmermann & Adewale Henry Adenuga, 2022. "Quantifying Land Fragmentation in Northern Irish Cattle Enterprises," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Sanchirico, James N. & Smith, Martin D., 2003. "Trophic Portfolios In Marine Fisheries: A Step Towards Ecosystem Management," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22191, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Blasiak, Robert, 2015. "Balloon effects reshaping global fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 18-20.
    5. Arnade, Carlos & Grigsby, Elaine, 1988. "Foreign Borrowing and Agricultural Trade of Major Latin American Debtors," Staff Reports 278010, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Kwabena Asiama & Rohan Bennett & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2019. "Towards Responsible Consolidation of Customary Lands: A Research Synthesis," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Nwaobi, Godwin, 2013. "The Economics of Climate Change and Science of Global Warming Debate:African Perspectives," MPRA Paper 46807, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Rojko, Anthony S. & Regier, Donald W. & O'Brien, Patrick & Coffing, Arthur L. & Bailey, Linda, 1978. "Alternative Futures for World Food in 1985: Volume 1, World GOL Model Analytical Report," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 146876, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Ewout Frankema, 2010. "The colonial roots of land inequality: geography, factor endowments, or institutions?," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 63(2), pages 418-451, May.
    10. Paul D'Arcy, 2014. "The Lawless Sea? Policy Options for Voluntary Compliance Regimes in Offshore Resource Zones in the Pacific," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(2), pages 297-311, May.
    11. Leones, Julie P. & Rozelle, Scott, 1991. "Rural Household Data Collection in Developing Countries: Designing Instruments and Methods for Collecting Farm Production Data," Working Papers 128161, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    12. Sun, Ke & Zhang, Jihong & Lin, Fan & Ren, Jeffrey S. & Zhao, Yunxia & Wu, Wenguang & Liu, Yi, 2020. "Evaluating the influences of integrated culture on pelagic ecosystem by a numerical approach: A case study of Sungo Bay, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    13. Rao, Xudong, 2014. "Land Fragmentation with Double Bonuses -- The Case of Tanzanian Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Neetz, Roger E., 1970. "Eastern Europe's Agricultural Development and Trade: Patterns and Perspectives," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145299, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Mathias, Karangwa, 2010. "The Effect of Land Fragmentation on the Productivity and Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Maize Farms in Southern Rwanda," Research Theses 243457, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    16. Christensen, Raymond P., 1970. "Economic Progress of Agriculture in Developing Nations 1950-68," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145135, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Shukun Wang & Dengwang Li & Tingting Li & Changquan Liu, 2021. "Land Use Transitions and Farm Performance in China: A Perspective of Land Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Pierre Damien Ntihinyurwa & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Farmland Fragmentation, Farmland Consolidation and Food Security: Relationships, Research Lapses and Future Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-39, January.
    19. Unknown, 1953. "Supplement to Major uses of Land in the United States," Technical Bulletins 156648, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Sun, Chin-Hwa & Chiang, Fu-Sung & Liu, Te-Shi & Chang, Ching-Cheng, 2001. "A Welfare Analysis Of El Nino Forecasts In The International Trade Of Fish Meal - An Application Of Stochastic Spatial Equilibrium Model," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20770, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    value chains; profitability; tilapia; aquaculture development; competitive behaviour; food safety; aquaculture; quality assurance; fishery production; Ghana; Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa; Western Africa;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.