IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/gsspwp/179834.html

Are food policies empowering women? Framework, measurement, and empirical evidence from India and Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Kyle, Jordan
  • Ragasa, Catherine

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) emphasize equal participation and empowerment of women in all levels of decisionmaking, yet frameworks and tools to measure and strengthen women's empowerment in policy spaces remain limited. Focusing on agrifood systems, this paper introduces a framework, metrics, and scoring method to track women’s empowerment in policy processes (WEAGov) and presents findings from pilot applications in India and Nigeria. The pilots draw on novel surveys with more than 200 agrifood organizations and policy experts across the public sector, private sector, civil society, and research communities in both countries. Across both countries, we find that agrifood policy documents incorporate gender priorities on paper but fall short in budgeting, implementation, and evaluation. Prevailing social attitudes and limited awareness of policies, regulations, and legal rights remain major constraints on women’s ability to engage meaningfully in policy processes. Women participate as staff and mid-level managers in agrifood organizations, but their representation at higher decision-making levels are limited. Expert assessments also highlight disconnects between formal roles and the actual influence women can exert over policy decisions. Gender-responsive budgeting processes are absent in Nigeria and weakly-institutionalized in India, where compliance has become procedural rather than transformative. These patterns reveal persistent bottlenecks in translating gender commitments into practice. By systematically tracking barriers and identifying entry points for reform, the WEAGov framework offers governments, researchers, and civil society organizations a practical tool to diagnose gaps in women’s empowerment in agrifood policy processes and to strengthen their inclusiveness and accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyle, Jordan & Ragasa, Catherine, 2025. "Are food policies empowering women? Framework, measurement, and empirical evidence from India and Nigeria," GSSP working papers 179834, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/179834
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp058 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Grossman, Guy & Humphreys, Macartan & Sacramone-Lutz, Gabriella, 2020. "Information Technology and Political Engagement: Mixed Evidence from Uganda," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 82(4), pages 1321-1336.
    3. Alkire, Sabina & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Peterman, Amber & Quisumbing, Agnes & Seymour, Greg & Vaz, Ana, 2013. "The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-91.
    4. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2023. "Women’s political empowerment: Influence of women in legislative versus executive branches in the fight against corruption," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 139-159.
    5. Bleck, Jaimie & Gottlieb, Jessica & Kosec, Katrina & Boss, Lindsey, 2021. "Women’s voices in civil society organizations: Evidence from a civil society mapping project in Mali," Issue briefs April 2021, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Mona Lena Krook & Pippa Norris, 2014. "Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 62(1), pages 1-1, March.
    7. Sushant & Moumita Laha, 2021. "Game changer or accounting practice? Gender responsive budgeting in India," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 539-547, October.
    8. Robinson, Amanda Lea & Gottlieb, Jessica, 2021. "How to Close the Gender Gap in Political Participation: Lessons from Matrilineal Societies in Africa," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 68-92, January.
    9. McDougall, Cynthia & Badstue, Lone B. & Mulema, Annet A. & Fischer, Gundula & Najjar, Dina & Pyburn, Rhiannon & Elias, Marlène & Joshi, Deepa & Vos, Andrea, 2021. "Toward structural change: Gender transformative approaches," IFPRI book chapters, in: Advancing gender equality through agricultural and environmental research: Past, present, and future, chapter 10, pages 365-402, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Mona Lena Krook & Pippa Norris, 2014. "Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 62(1), pages 2-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex O. Acheampong & Eric Evans Osei Opoku & Niharika Rustagi, 2024. "Gender quota, women in politics, and gender parity in education," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1223-1260, November.
    2. Migheli, Matteo, 2022. "Lost in election. How different electoral systems translate the voting gender gap into gender representation bias," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Sally Sargeson & Tamara Jacka, 2018. "Improving Women's Substantive Representation in Community Government: Evidence from Chinese Villages," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(5), pages 1166-1194, September.
    4. Owain Smolović Jones & Sanela Smolović Jones & Scott Taylor & Emily Yarrow, 2022. "Theorizing gender desegregation as political work: The case of the Welsh Labour Party," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1747-1763, November.
    5. Wang, Zhao & He, Yali & Jiang, Tianqi, 2024. "Does the gender composition of local governments matter for firms’ information environment? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Murshed, Rubaiya, 2025. "Are women more or less likely to vote than men? Evidence from rural Bangladesh," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    7. Yuko KASUYA & Hirofumi MIWA & Yoshikuni ONO, 2022. "Why are There More Women in the Upper House?," Discussion papers 22094, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Camilo Campos-Valdés & Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda & Mauricio Morales Quiroga & Jordi Pereira & Félix Liberona Durán, 2021. "The Impact of Candidates’ Profile and Campaign Decisions in Electoral Results: A Data Analytics Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Valente, Jordan & Moreno, Frede, 2014. "Women’s representation in local politics: Evidence from The Philippines," MPRA Paper 57903, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Aug 2014.
    10. Albert Stanslas Junior Chisanga & Adrian Matole & Eliazer Lushinga Kawila & Sanny Mulubale, 2024. "Unearthing Strategies to Mitigate Political Violence Against Women in Matero Constituency of Lusaka District, Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 397-403, May.
    11. Oren Griffiths & Lynette Roberts & Josh Price, 2019. "Desirable leadership attributes are preferentially associated with women: A quantitative study of gender and leadership roles in the Australian workforce," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(1), pages 32-49, February.
    12. Masa Sylvester Motadi, 2024. "Matriarchal leadership as the catalyst for positive change in Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(7), pages 436-444, October.
    13. Mihail CIOBANU & Eugenia LUCASENCO, 2019. "Analysis of gender quotas implementation for women empowerment: EU and Republic of Moldova’s experience," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 28(1), pages 163-176.
    14. Petra Ahrens & Petra Meier, 2024. "From Parliament to Party: The Gender‐Sensitive Parliamentary Group," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    15. Terence Wood, 2015. "Aiding Women Candidates in Solomon Islands: Suggestions for Development Policy," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(3), pages 531-543, September.
    16. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    17. DeJaeghere, Joan & Pellowski Wiger, Nancy & Le, Hue & Luong, Phuong & Ngo, Nga Thi Hang & Vu, Thanh Thi & Lee, Jongwook, 2022. "Why do aspirations matter for empowerment?: Discrepancies between the A-WEAI domains and aspirations of ethnic minority women in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Khan, Mohammed Tajuddin & Kishore, Avinash & Joshi, Pramod K., 2016. "Gender dimensions on farmers’ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India," IFPRI discussion papers 1550, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. O'Hara, Corey & Clement, Floriane, 2018. "Power as agency: A critical reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment in the development sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 111-123.
    20. Malapit, Hazel Jean L. & Sproule, Kathryn & Kovarik, Chiara, 2017. "Using cognitive interviewing to improve the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index survey instruments: Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 2(02), April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:gsspwp:179834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.