IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fedpwp/101515.html

Unintended Consequences of Regulating Central Clearing

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Recent U.S. and European regulations promote centrally clearing derivatives to reduce complexity and systemic risk in the financial system. We argue that more clearing does not guarantee less systemic risk. We identify conditions under which the core clears less intensively than the periphery, which increases systemic risk by substituting multilateral netting for bilateral netting and making contagion less likely to start in the core but more likely to spread from the core. We study confidential derivatives regulatory data and find evidence of such clearing patterns. We further explore the implications of complexity and centrality within the financial system for stability

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo D'Erasmo & Selman Erol & Guillermo Ordoñez, 2025. "Unintended Consequences of Regulating Central Clearing," Working Papers 25-24, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:101515
    DOI: 10.21799/frbp.wp.2025.24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/FRBP/Assets/working-papers/2025/wp25-24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21799/frbp.wp.2025.24?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paddrick, Mark & Young, H. Peyton, 2021. "How safe are central counterparties in credit default swap markets?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101170, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Andrew G. Atkeson & Andrea L. Eisfeldt & Pierre‐Olivier Weill, 2015. "Entry and Exit in OTC Derivatives Markets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 2231-2292, November.
    3. Larry Eisenberg & Thomas H. Noe, 2001. "Systemic Risk in Financial Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 236-249, February.
    4. Erol, Selman & Ordoñez, Guillermo, 2017. "Network reactions to banking regulations," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 51-67.
    5. Ghamami, Samim & Glasserman, Paul, 2017. "Does OTC derivatives reform incentivize central clearing?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 76-87.
    6. Darrell Duffie, 2015. "Resolution of Failing Central Counterparties," Book Chapters, in: Kenneth E. Scott & Thomas H. Jackson & John B. Taylor (ed.), Making Failure Feasible, chapter 4, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
    7. Haelim Anderson & Guillermo Ordonez & Selman Erol, 2019. "Interbank Networks in the Shadows of the Federal Reserve Act," 2019 Meeting Papers 1285, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. Erol, Selman & Vohra, Rakesh, 2022. "Network formation and systemic risk," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Ricardo J. Caballero & Alp Simsek, 2013. "Fire Sales in a Model of Complexity," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(6), pages 2549-2587, December.
    10. Kuong, John Chi-Fong & Maurin, Vincent, 2024. "The Design of a Central Counterparty," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(3), pages 1257-1299, May.
    11. Cont Rama & Kokholm Thomas, 2014. "Central clearing of OTC derivatives: Bilateral vs multilateral netting," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 31(1), pages 3-22, March.
    12. Duffie, Darrell & Scheicher, Martin & Vuillemey, Guillaume, 2015. "Central clearing and collateral demand," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 237-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jackson, Matthew O. & Pernoud, Agathe, 2025. "Optimal regulation and investment incentives in financial networks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elliott, Matthew & Georg, Co-Pierre & Hazell, Jonathon, 2021. "Systemic risk shifting in financial networks," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Kubitza, Christian & Pelizzon, Loriana & Getmansky, Mila, 2018. "The pitfalls of central clearing in the presence of systematic risk," ICIR Working Paper Series 31/18, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    3. Marco Bardoscia & Fabio Caccioli & Haotian Gao, 2022. "Efficiency of central clearing under liquidity stress," Bank of England Staff Working Paper series 1002, Bank of England.
    4. Elliott, Matthew & Georg, Co-Pierre & Hazell, Jonathon, 2021. "Systemic risk shifting in financial networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123924, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Casu, Barbara & Kalotychou, Elena & Katsoulis, Petros, 2025. "Stress testing OTC derivatives: Clearing reforms and market frictions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Luitgard Anna Maria Veraart & Iñaki Aldasoro, 2025. "Systemic risk in markets with multiple central counterparties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 214-262, January.
    7. Mark Paddrik & H. Peyton Young, 2017. "How Safe are Central Counterparties in Derivatives Markets?," Working Papers 17-06, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    8. Ghamami, Samim & Glasserman, Paul & Young, Hobart, 2022. "Collateralized networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107496, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Melinda Friesz & Kira Muratov-Szabó & Andrea Prepuk & Kata Váradi, 2021. "Risk Mutualization in Central Clearing: An Answer to the Cross-Guarantee Phenomenon from the Financial Stability Viewpoint," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Christian Kubitza & Loriana Pelizzon & Mila Getmansky Sherman, 2024. "Loss Sharing in Central Clearinghouses: Winners and Losers," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 237-273.
    11. Hamed Amini & Zachary Feinstein, 2020. "Optimal Network Compression," Papers 2008.08733, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    12. H Peyton Young & Mark Paddrik, 2019. "How Safe are Central Counterparties in Credit Default Swap Markets?," Economics Series Working Papers 885, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    13. Samim Ghamami & Paul Glasserman & H. Peyton Young, 2022. "Collateralized Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2202-2225, March.
    14. Paddrick, Mark & Young, H. Peyton, 2021. "How safe are central counterparties in credit default swap markets?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101170, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Ramírez, Carlos, 2020. "Regulating financial networks under uncertainty," ESRB Working Paper Series 107, European Systemic Risk Board.
    16. Carlos Ramírez, 2019. "Regulating Financial Networks Under Uncertainty," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-056, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    17. Mark Paddrik & Sriram Rajan & H. Peyton Young, 2020. "Contagion in Derivatives Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3603-3616, August.
    18. Elliott, M. & Georg, C-P. & Hazell, J., 2020. "Systemic Risk-Shifting in Financial Networks," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2068, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. Marco D’Errico & Tarik Roukny, 2021. "Compressing Over-the-Counter Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 1660-1679, November.
    20. Ghamami, Samim & Paddrik, Mark & Zhang, Simpson, 2023. "Central Counterparty Default Waterfalls and Systemic Loss," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(8), pages 3577-3612, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • E50 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - General
    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fedpwp:101515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Beth Paul (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbphus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.