IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fda/fdaddt/2007-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Satisfaction from Intra-Household Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Namkee Ahn
  • Victoria Ateca
  • Arantza Ugidos

Abstract

We address individuals’ financial satisfaction from the intra-household perspective. Our purpose is twofold. First, we want to contrast the hypothesis of relative income within the household. Does the income level of one individual relative to that of other members of the same household matter in his/her income satisfaction? Second, we want to test procedural utility hypothesis in that different sources of income may contribute differentially to individuals’ income satisfaction. In particular, we compare between labour earnings and non-labour income. These two hypotheses are relevant for policy-making regarding subsidies, taxation and active labour market programs. We use data for Spain and Denmark in the European Community Household Panel (ECHP). In general terms, and for both countries, our results seem to confirm both the procedural hypothesis and the relative income hypothesis. Labour income contributes more to individual financial satisfaction than non-labour income for both husbands and wives in both countries. However, the effect of own share of labour income relative to the spouse’s differs considerably between men and woman and between the two countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Namkee Ahn & Victoria Ateca & Arantza Ugidos, 2007. "Financial Satisfaction from Intra-Household Perspectives," Working Papers 2007-37, FEDEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2007-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2007/dt-2007-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jérôme De Henau, 2008. "Asymetric power within couples: the gendered effect of children and employment on entitlement to household income," Brussels Economic Review, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 51(2/3), pages 269-290.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fda:fdaddt:2007-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmen Arias). General contact details of provider: http://www.fedea.net .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.