IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/euriss/26853.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Climate Change and Development Framings: A Comparative Analysis of the Human Development Report 2007/8 an the World Development Report 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Gasper, D.R.
  • Portocarrero, A.V.
  • Lera St. Clair, A.

Abstract

The Human Development Report 2007/8 (HDR) and the World Development Report 2010 (WDR) are both devoted to the connections between climate change and development. The reports provide very different perspectives on where the key challenges reside. Their policy proposals are also different, but much less so. The paper investigates these dissimilarities and similarities, and explores the framings in the Overviews of the two reports. It compares their conceptions of development, their normative content, the role given to human rights, and the status of proposed market solutions to issues of climate change and development. It ends by asking why, when the problem framings so significantly differ, the proposed solutions differed far less.

Suggested Citation

  • Gasper, D.R. & Portocarrero, A.V. & Lera St. Clair, A., 2011. "Climate Change and Development Framings: A Comparative Analysis of the Human Development Report 2007/8 an the World Development Report 2010," ISS Working Papers - General Series 528, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:26853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/26853/wp528.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Des Gasper, 2011. "Pioneering the Human Development Revolution: Analysing the Trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 433-456.
    2. Nick Brooks & Natasha Grist & Katrina Brown, 2009. "Development Futures in the Context of Climate Change: Challenging the Present and Learning from the Past," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 27(6), pages 741-765, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:26853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RePub). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/issssnl.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.