IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/138989.html

Beyond health: a systematic review of cross-sector economic implications of school-based mental health programmes in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Wendel, Flora
  • Walbaum, Magdalena
  • Finger, Celina
  • Brettschneider, Christian
  • Jung-Sievers, Caroline
  • Knapp, Martin
  • Rehfuess, Eva A
  • Asaria, Miqdad

Abstract

Objective To assess the economic evidence on school-based prevention and mental health promotion interventions, focusing on costs and outcomes across key societal sectors, including healthcare, education, social care, criminal justice, as well as in productivity and individual expenses. Design A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis approach, including an assessment of monetised outcomes across all sectors and an additional analysis of non-monetised outcomes in the education sector. Study quality was appraised using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC). Data sources Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Econlit, ERIC and Scopus. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Economic evaluations of school-based prevention or mental health promotion interventions for children or adolescents in Europe that report outcomes across healthcare and other societal sectors. Results 20 studies were included, comprising different types of economic evaluations as well as trial-based and model-based evaluations. Based on the primary analyses reported in the studies, which consider costs and benefits across multiple societal sectors, most evaluations suggested favourable economic outcomes. Benefits exceeded costs in four out of five (80%) cost–benefit analyses (average cost–benefit ratio of 5.14). Half of the cost-effectiveness analyses found that interventions were more effective but also more costly than the comparator while two interventions were both more effective and less costly. In cost–utility analyses, 9 out of 10 (90%) fell below commonly used thresholds for good value for money. Reported outcomes covered healthcare, education, social care, criminal justice sectors, as well as productivity and individual expenses. Pronounced cost savings from included interventions were observed in productivity and healthcare, with improvements also observed in non-monetised education outcomes. Study quality was mixed. Conclusions School-based mental health interventions yield cross-sectoral economic benefits and, in many cases, societal returns on investment, in both the short and longer term, by influencing key determinants of health and well-being across multiple sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendel, Flora & Walbaum, Magdalena & Finger, Celina & Brettschneider, Christian & Jung-Sievers, Caroline & Knapp, Martin & Rehfuess, Eva A & Asaria, Miqdad, 2026. "Beyond health: a systematic review of cross-sector economic implications of school-based mental health programmes in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138989, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/138989/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Filmer, Deon & Rogers, Halsey & Angrist, Noam & Sabarwal, Shwetlena, 2020. "Learning-adjusted years of schooling (LAYS): Defining a new macro measure of education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Brian R. Flay & Linda M. Collins, 2005. "Historical Review of School-Based Randomized Trials for Evaluating Problem Behavior Prevention Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 599(1), pages 115-146, May.
    3. Drummond, Michael & Stoddart, Greg, 1995. "Assessment of health producing measures across different sectors," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-231, September.
    4. Weatherly, Helen & Drummond, Michael & Claxton, Karl & Cookson, Richard & Ferguson, Brian & Godfrey, Christine & Rice, Nigel & Sculpher, Mark & Sowden, Amanda, 2009. "Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(2-3), pages 85-92, December.
    5. Drummond, Michael F. & Sculpher, Mark J. & Claxton, Karl & Stoddart, Greg L. & Torrance, George W., 2015. "Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 4, number 9780199665884.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Franklin & James Lomas & Gerry Richardson, 2020. "Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(7), pages 665-681, July.
    2. Deidda, Manuela & Geue, Claudia & Kreif, Noemi & Dundas, Ruth & McIntosh, Emma, 2019. "A framework for conducting economic evaluations alongside natural experiments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 353-361.
    3. Tom L. Drake & Yoel Lubell, 2017. "Malaria and Economic Evaluation Methods: Challenges and Opportunities," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 291-297, June.
    4. Hill, Sarah R. & Vale, Luke & Hunter, David & Henderson, Emily & Oluboyede, Yemi, 2017. "Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: Is the evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1249-1262.
    5. Angrist, Noam & Evans, David K. & Filmer, Deon & Glennerster, Rachel & Rogers, Halsey & Sabarwal, Shwetlena, 2025. "How to improve education outcomes most efficiently? A review of the evidence using a unified metric," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Thiboonboon, Kittiphong & Lourenco, Richard De Abreu & Cronin, Paula & Khoo, Terence & Goodall, Stephen, 2024. "Economic Evaluations of Obesity-Targeted Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Taxes–A Review to Identify Methodological Issues," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Cochrane, M. & Watson, P.M. & Timpson, H. & Haycox, A. & Collins, B. & Jones, L. & Martin, A. & Graves, L.E.F., 2019. "Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 156-167.
    8. Irina Pokhilenko & Luca M. M. Janssen & Aggie T. G. Paulus & Ruben M. W. A. Drost & William Hollingworth & Joanna C. Thorn & Sian Noble & Judit Simon & Claudia Fischer & Susanne Mayer & Luis Salvador-, 2023. "Development of an Instrument for the Assessment of Health-Related Multi-sectoral Resource Use in Europe: The PECUNIA RUM," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 155-166, March.
    9. Chiranjeev Sanyal & Don Husereau, 2020. "Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Services Provided by Community Pharmacists," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 375-392, June.
    10. Arantzazu Arrospide & Oliver Ibarrondo & Iván Castilla & Igor Larrañaga & Javier Mar, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model to Evaluate the Cardiovascular Impact of Population Policies for Obesity," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(2), pages 241-254, February.
    11. Yesim Tozan & Joshua Kiyingi & Sooyoung Kim & Flavia Namuwonge & Florence Namuli & Vicent Ssentumbwe & Rashida Namirembe & Edwinnah Kasidi & Ozge Sensoy Bahar & Mary M Mckay & Fred M Ssewamala, 2024. "Micro-costing analysis of a combination intervention for improved mental health and HIV risk behaviors among school-going adolescent girls in Uganda," PLOS Mental Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Joanna M Charles & Deirdre M Harrington & Melanie J Davies & Charlotte L Edwardson & Trish Gorely & Danielle H Bodicoat & Kamlesh Khunti & Lauren B Sherar & Thomas Yates & Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, 2019. "Micro-costing and a cost-consequence analysis of the ‘Girls Active’ programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Dong-Won Kang & Patricio B. Lynn & Li Wang & Shouhao Zhou & Chan Shen, 2025. "Cost-Effectiveness of Fruquintinib for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the USA," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 93-101, January.
    14. Daphne C. Voormolen & Judith A. M. Bom & Esther W. de Bekker-Grob & Werner B. F. Brouwer & Job van Exel, 2024. "Development and Content Validation of the 10-item Well-being Instrument (WiX) for use in Economic Evaluation Studies," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 381-413, April.
    15. Valentina Prevolnik Rupel & Marko Ogorevc, 2023. "EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Slovenia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 41(11), pages 1515-1524, November.
    16. Julie A. Campbell & Glen J. Henson & Valery Fuh Ngwa & Hasnat Ahmad & Bruce V. Taylor & Ingrid Mei & Andrew J. Palmer, 2025. "Estimation of Transition Probabilities from a Large Cohort (> 6000) of Australians Living with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) for Changing Disability Severity Classifications, MS Phenotype, and Disease-Modifying Therapy Classifications," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 223-239, February.
    17. Alireza Boloori & Soroush Saghafian, 2023. "Health and Economic Impacts of Lockdown Policies in the Early Stage of COVID-19 in the United States," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 188-211, September.
    18. Guriev, Sergei & Treisman, Daniel, 2020. "A theory of informational autocracy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Christopher M Doran & Irina Kinchin, 2020. "Economic and epidemiological impact of youth suicide in countries with the highest human development index," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, May.
    20. Boniface Oyugi & Olena Nizalova & Sally Kendall & Stephen Peckham, 2024. "Does a free maternity policy in Kenya work? Impact and cost–benefit consideration based on demographic health survey data," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:138989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.