IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/122404.html

The impact of information frictions within regulators: evidence from workplace safety violations

Author

Listed:
  • Raghunandan, Aneesh
  • Ruchti, Thomas

Abstract

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is decentralized, wherein field offices coordinated at the state level undertake inspections. We study whether this structure can lead to interstate frictions in sharing information and how this impacts firms’ compliance with workplace safety laws. We find that firms caught violating in one state subsequently violate less in that state but violate more in other states. Despite this pattern, and in keeping with information frictions, violations in one state do not trigger proactive OSHA inspections in other states. Moreover, firms face lower monetary penalties when subsequent violations occur across state lines, likely due to the lack of documentation necessary to assess severe penalties. Finally, firms are more likely to shift violating behavior into states with greater information frictions. Our findings suggest that internal information within regulators impacts the likelihood and location of corporate misconduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghunandan, Aneesh & Ruchti, Thomas, 2024. "The impact of information frictions within regulators: evidence from workplace safety violations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122404, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122404/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alison D. Morantz, 2009. "Has Devolution Injured American Workers? State and Federal Enforcement of Construction Safety," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 183-210, May.
    2. David Weil, 1996. "If OSHA Is So Bad, Why is Compliance So Good?," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 27(3), pages 618-640, Autumn.
    3. Aneesh Raghunandan, 2021. "Financial misconduct and employee mistreatment: Evidence from wage theft," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 867-905, September.
    4. Jonathan Cohn & Nicole Nestoriak & Malcolm Wardlaw & Wei Jiang, 2021. "Private Equity Buyouts and Workplace Safety," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(10), pages 4832-4875.
    5. Kedia, Simi & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2011. "Do the SEC's enforcement preferences affect corporate misconduct?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 259-278, April.
    6. Schantl, Stefan F. & Wagenhofer, Alfred, 2020. "Deterrence of financial misreporting when public and private enforcement strategically interact," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    7. Nickell, Stephen J, 1981. "Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1417-1426, November.
    8. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 24-52, Special I.
    9. Shai Bernstein & Albert Sheen, 2016. "The Operational Consequences of Private Equity Buyouts: Evidence from the Restaurant Industry," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(9), pages 2387-2418.
    10. John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2013. "Who Creates Jobs? Small versus Large versus Young," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 347-361, May.
    11. Matthew S. Johnson & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2023. "Improving Regulatory Effectiveness through Better Targeting: Evidence from OSHA," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 30-67, October.
    12. Antonio E. Bernardo, 2004. "Capital Budgeting in Multidivision Firms: Information, Agency, and Incentives," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 739-767.
    13. Gary Chamberlain, 2010. "Binary Response Models for Panel Data: Identification and Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 159-168, January.
    14. Shelley Xin Li & Tatiana Sandino, 2018. "Effects of an Information Sharing System on Employee Creativity, Engagement, and Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(2), pages 713-747, May.
    15. Wouter Dessein, 2002. "Authority and Communication in Organizations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(4), pages 811-838.
    16. Greene, William, 2010. "Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 291-296, May.
    17. Hahn, Jinyong & Kuersteiner, Guido, 2011. "Bias Reduction For Dynamic Nonlinear Panel Models With Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 1152-1191, December.
    18. Kanodia, C, 1993. "Participative Budgets As Coordination And Motivational Devices," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 172-189.
    19. Bo E. Honoré & Ekaterini Kyriazidou, 2000. "Panel Data Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Dependent Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 839-874, July.
    20. Manuel Arellano & Stephen Bond, 1991. "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 58(2), pages 277-297.
    21. Manuel Arellano & Jinyong Hahn, 2016. "A likelihood-Based Approximate Solution to the Incidental Parameter Problem in Dynamic Nonlinear Models with Multiple Effects," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 251-274, July.
    22. Luis Garicano, 2000. "Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(5), pages 874-904, October.
    23. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    24. Tony Lancaster, 2002. "Orthogonal Parameters and Panel Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(3), pages 647-666.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Breuer & Eva Labro & Haresh Sapra & Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, 2024. "Bridging Theory and Empirical Research in Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(3), pages 1121-1139, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2015. "Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 991-1030.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/f6h8764enu2lskk9p2m9mgp8l is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Schumann, Martin & Severini, Thomas A. & Tripathi, Gautam, 2021. "Integrated likelihood based inference for nonlinear panel data models with unobserved effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 73-95.
    5. Antonio Pacifico, 2025. "High-Dimensional Dynamic Panel with Correlated Random Effects: A Semiparametric Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(1), pages 869-902, July.
    6. Dhaene, Geert & Sun, Yutao, 2021. "Second-order corrected likelihood for nonlinear panel models with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 227-252.
    7. Vasilis Sarafidis & Tom Wansbeek, 2020. "Celebrating 40 Years of Panel Data Analysis: Past, Present and Future," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 6/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    8. Dhaene, Geert & Jochmans, Koen, 2016. "Likelihood Inference In An Autoregression With Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1178-1215, October.
    9. Dhaene, Geert & Jochmans, Koen, 2016. "Likelihood Inference In An Autoregression With Fixed Effects," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 1178-1215, October.
    10. Fernández-Val, Iván, 2009. "Fixed effects estimation of structural parameters and marginal effects in panel probit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 71-85, May.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09ij4j0h0h1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Lee, Yoonseok, 2012. "Bias in dynamic panel models under time series misspecification," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 54-60.
    13. Xuan Leng & Jiaming Mao & Yutao Sun, 2023. "Debiased Inference for Dynamic Nonlinear Panels with Multi-dimensional Heterogeneities," Papers 2305.03134, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    14. Geert Dhaene & Martin Weidner, 2023. "Approximate functional differencing," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 379-416, December.
    15. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2011. "Profile-score Adjustements for Nonlinearfixed-effect Models," Working Papers hal-01073733, HAL.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09j0031f620 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/eu4vqp9ompqllr09j0031f620 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m052g20qh is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Geert Dhaene & Martin Weidner, 2023. "Approximate Functional Differencing," Papers 2301.13736, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Geert Dhaene & Koen Jochmans, 2011. "Profile-score Adjustements for Nonlinearfixed-effect Models," Working Papers hal-01073733, HAL.
    21. Seung C. Ahn & Gareth M. Thomas, 2023. "Likelihood-based inference for dynamic panel data models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 2859-2909, June.
    22. Laura Alfaro & Nick Bloom & Paola Conconi & Harald Fadinger & Patrick Legros & Andrew F Newman & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2024. "Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 34-72.
    23. Alvarez, Javier & Arellano, Manuel, 2022. "Robust likelihood estimation of dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 21-61.
    24. L. Hospido, 2012. "Modelling heterogeneity and dynamics in the volatility of individual wages," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 386-414, April.
    25. Aguirregabiria, Victor & Gu, Jiaying & Luo, Yao, 2021. "Sufficient statistics for unobserved heterogeneity in structural dynamic logit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 280-311.
    26. William F. Lincoln & Andrew H. McCallum & Michael Siemer, 2017. "The Great Recession and a Missing Generation of Exporters," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-108, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • J83 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Workers' Rights
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.