IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/106220.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Creating cultures of care: exploring the social organization of care delivery in long-term care homes

Author

Listed:
  • Caspar, Sienna
  • Phinney, Alison
  • Spenceley, Shannon
  • Ratner, Pam

Abstract

Context: As a result of changing demographics, the number of older adults living in long-term care homes (LTCHs) is expected to rise dramatically. Thus, there is a pressing need for better understanding of how the social organization of care may facilitate or hinder the quality of work-life and care in LTCHs. Objectives: This study explored how the social organization of work influences the quality of work-life and care delivery in LTCHs. Method: Institutional ethnography followed by theory building provided the conceptual underpinnings of the methodological approaches. Participants included 42 care team members who were employed by one of three participating LTCHs. Data were derived from 104 hours of participant observation and 42 interviews. Findings: The resident care aides (RCAs) were found to rely on supportive work-teams to accomplish their work successfully and safely. Reciprocity emerged as a key feature of supportive work-teams. Management practices that demonstrated respect (e.g., inclusion in residents’ admission processes), recognition, and responsiveness to the RCAs’ concerns facilitated reciprocity among the RCAs. Such reciprocity strengthened their resilience in their day-to-day work as they coped with common work-place adversities (e.g., scarce resources and grief when residents died), and was essential in shaping the quality of their work-life and provision of care. Discussion: The empowerment pyramid for person-centred care model proposes that the presence of empowered, responsive leaders exerts a significant influence on the cultivation of organizational trust and reciprocating care teams. Positive work-place relationships enable greater resilience amongst members of the care team and enhances the RCAs’ quality of work-life, which in turn influences the quality of care they provide. Limitations: Whether there were differences in the experiences, opinions, and behaviour of the people who agreed to participate and those who declined to take part could not be ascertained. Further research is required to determine and understand all of the factors that support or inhibit the development of empowered leaders in LTCHs. Implications: Cultures of caring, reciprocity and trust are created when leaders in the sector have the support and capacity to lead responsively and in ways that acknowledge and respect the contributions of all members of the team caring for some of the most vulnerable people.

Suggested Citation

  • Caspar, Sienna & Phinney, Alison & Spenceley, Shannon & Ratner, Pam, 2020. "Creating cultures of care: exploring the social organization of care delivery in long-term care homes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106220, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:106220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/106220/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Onwuegbuzie & Nancy Leech, 2007. "Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 233-249, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arif Mostafa Khan & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2024. "The role of multi‐stakeholder initiatives in advancing circularity and social sustainability in the textiles sector of Bangladesh," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 1765-1788, April.
    2. Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic & Floetgen, Rob Jago & Urmetzer, Florian, 2024. "Performance of B2B Platform Partnership Management," MPRA Paper 120610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sven Ivens & Monika Oberle, 2020. "Does Scientific Evaluation Matter? Improving Digital Simulation Games by Design-Based Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Hassan Raza, 2018. "Participatory action research: working beyond disaster toward prevention," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 117-131, March.
    5. Rosario Vázquez-Carrasco & Ma. López-Pérez & Edgar Centeno, 2012. "A qualitative approach to the challenges for women in management: are they really starting in the 21st century?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1337-1357, August.
    6. Hamdan A. Alamri & Abdulaziz A. Alfayez, 2023. "Preservice teachers’ experiences of observing their teaching competencies via self-recorded videos in a personalized learning environment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Eeva‐Mari Ihantola & Lili‐Anne Kihn, 2011. "Threats to validity and reliability in mixed methods accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 39-58, April.
    8. Matthew M. Mars, 2022. "Community and Cultural Entrepreneurship and Value Co-Creation in the Local Food Marketscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Sam De Boise, 2014. "Learning to be Affected: Masculinities, Music and Social Embodiment," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Wiley Kimberly Kay, 2022. "Leveraging Political Resources: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Sascha Fuerst & Odille Sanchez-Dominguez & Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Montes, 2023. "The Role of Digital Technology within the Business Model of Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Genevé Richard & Elza Odendaal, 2020. "Integrated reporting assurance practices—a study of South African firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 245-266, December.
    13. Seyyed Ostovar-Namaghi & Maryam Gholami, 2018. "Exploring Language Teachers’ Perceptions of Cyclical Presentation of Materials in an EFL Context: A Grounded Theory," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-60, March.
    14. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    15. Karen Hidden & Jonathan Tresman Marks, 2020. "Misaligned Needs in the Pursuit of Shared Value: A Multi-Stakeholder Study of the Shift from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(2), pages 363-382, July.
    16. Joel Oommen George & Suzanne Elayan & Martin Sykora & Marin Solter & Rob Feick & Christopher Hewitt & Yiqiao Liu & Ketan Shankardass, 2023. "The Role of Social Media in Building Pandemic Resilience in an Urban Community: A Qualitative Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-18, September.
    17. John Robert Warren & Andrew Halpern-Manners, 2012. "Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Social Science Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 491-534, November.
    18. Milanova, Veselina & Maas, Peter, 2017. "Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 159-171.
    19. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.
    20. Genevé Richard & Elza Odendaal, 2021. "Credibility-enhancing mechanisms, other than external assurance, in integrated reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 61-93, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality of care; nursing homes; leadership; empowerment; quality of work-life;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • J01 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:106220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.