IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v13y2022i1p1-30n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Political Resources: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Author

Listed:
  • Wiley Kimberly Kay

    (Family, Youth, and Community Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)

Abstract

As politics becomes increasingly polarized, the value of collective political action becomes more visible and overt. Nonprofit organizations act collectively in pursuit of their policy goals in nearly all aspects of public policy. Understanding how nonprofits borne of social movements engage politically expands our insight into advocacy coalition behavior following seemingly effective social movements. The coalition’s leveraging of political resources provides us this insight. This study assesses the policy activities produced or maintained within a U.S. national domestic violence advocacy coalition over its lifetime to determine how and when resources were leveraged. A directed content analysis is conducted on historical data to capture the evolution of coalition activities over a 41-year period. The coalition’s emphasis on policy change waned over time as it achieved its policy goals. The coalition then leaned on its largest resources, mobilizable troops, and information to increasingly emphasize policy implementation and evaluation. These findings indicate that when in the policy process coalitions leverage their political resources may be more important than how coalitions leverage resources. Framing nonprofit political activity across the stages of the policy process can open doors to better use of scarce political resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiley Kimberly Kay, 2022. "Leveraging Political Resources: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:1-30:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2020-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2020-0020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2020-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Onwuegbuzie & Nancy Leech, 2007. "Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 233-249, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seyyed Ostovar-Namaghi & Maryam Gholami, 2018. "Exploring Language Teachers’ Perceptions of Cyclical Presentation of Materials in an EFL Context: A Grounded Theory," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-60, March.
    2. Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic & Floetgen, Rob Jago & Urmetzer, Florian, 2024. "Performance of B2B Platform Partnership Management," MPRA Paper 120610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sven Ivens & Monika Oberle, 2020. "Does Scientific Evaluation Matter? Improving Digital Simulation Games by Design-Based Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Hassan Raza, 2018. "Participatory action research: working beyond disaster toward prevention," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 117-131, March.
    5. Lukka, Kari & Modell, Sven, 2010. "Validation in interpretive management accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 462-477, May.
    6. Caspar, Sienna & Phinney, Alison & Spenceley, Shannon & Ratner, Pam, 2020. "Creating cultures of care: exploring the social organization of care delivery in long-term care homes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106220, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Rosario Vázquez-Carrasco & Ma. López-Pérez & Edgar Centeno, 2012. "A qualitative approach to the challenges for women in management: are they really starting in the 21st century?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1337-1357, August.
    8. Hamdan A. Alamri & Abdulaziz A. Alfayez, 2023. "Preservice teachers’ experiences of observing their teaching competencies via self-recorded videos in a personalized learning environment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Karen Hidden & Jonathan Tresman Marks, 2020. "Misaligned Needs in the Pursuit of Shared Value: A Multi-Stakeholder Study of the Shift from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(2), pages 363-382, July.
    10. Joel Oommen George & Suzanne Elayan & Martin Sykora & Marin Solter & Rob Feick & Christopher Hewitt & Yiqiao Liu & Ketan Shankardass, 2023. "The Role of Social Media in Building Pandemic Resilience in an Urban Community: A Qualitative Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-18, September.
    11. John Robert Warren & Andrew Halpern-Manners, 2012. "Panel Conditioning in Longitudinal Social Science Surveys," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 491-534, November.
    12. Milanova, Veselina & Maas, Peter, 2017. "Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 159-171.
    13. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.
    14. Genevé Richard & Elza Odendaal, 2021. "Credibility-enhancing mechanisms, other than external assurance, in integrated reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 61-93, March.
    15. Laumann, Karin, 2020. "Criteria for qualitative methods in human reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    16. Julia K. Groote & Sabrina Schell & Nadine Kammerlander & Andreas Hack, 2023. "The role of similarity and complementarity in the selection of potential partners for open innovation projects in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1347-1367, April.
    17. Sindre A. Høyland & Janne M. Hagen & Wolf Engelbach, 2017. "Developing and Applying a Framework for Assessing the Research Quality of Qualitative Project Methods in the EU Project SECUR-ED," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, May.
    18. Eeva‐Mari Ihantola & Lili‐Anne Kihn, 2011. "Threats to validity and reliability in mixed methods accounting research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 39-58, April.
    19. Santos, Paula Luisa Costa Teixeira & Monteiro, Paulo Adelino Antunes & Studic, Milena & Majumdar, Arnab, 2017. "A methodology used for the development of an Air Traffic Management functional system architecture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 445-457.
    20. Matthew M. Mars, 2022. "Community and Cultural Entrepreneurship and Value Co-Creation in the Local Food Marketscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:1-30:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.