IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Testing for Nonlinear Adjustment in Smooth Transition Vector Error Correction Models

  • Byeongseon Seo
Registered author(s):

    The smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) model was proposed by Chan and Tong (1986) as a generalization of the threshold autoregressive (TAR) model, and since then it has attracted wide attention in the recent literature on the business cycles and the equilibrium parity relationships of commodity prices, exchange rates, and equity prices. Economic behavior is affected by asymmetric transaction costs and institutional rigidities, and thus a large number of studies - for example, Neftci (1984), Terasvirta and Anderson (1992), and Michael, Nobay, and Peel (1997) - have shown that many economic variables and relations display asymmetry and nonlinear adjustment. One of the most crucial issues in models of this kind is testing for the presence of nonlinear adjustment with the null of linearity. Luukkonen, Saikkonen, and Terasvirta (1988) expanded the transition function and proposed the variable addition tests as the tests of linearity against smooth transition nonlinearity, and the tests have been used in many empirical studies. However, the test statistics are based on the polynomial approximation, and the approximation errors may affect statistical inference depending on the parameter values of transition rate and location. Furthermore, the tests are not directly related to the smooth transition model, and thus we cannot retrace what causes the rejection of linearity. This paper considers the direct tests for nonlinear adjustment, which are based on the exact specification of smooth transition. The smooth transition model entails transition parameters, which cannot be identified under the null hypothesis. However, the optimality issue in the smooth transition model has not been treated extensively. The optimality issue regarding unidentified parameters has been developed by Davies (1987), Andrews (1993), and Hansen (1996). Hansen (1996) particularly considered the optimality issue in threshold models. The threshold parameter cannot be identified under the null hypothesis, and as a result the likelihood ratio statistic has the nonstandard distribution. The smooth transition model generalizes the threshold model, and thus this paper develops the appropriate tests and the associated distribution theory based on the optimality argument. Many empirical studies have found evidence on the presence of stochastic nonlinear dependence in equilibrium relations such as purchasing power parity. For example, Michael, Nobay, and Peel (1997), considering the equilibrium model of real exchange rate in the presence of transaction costs, found strong evidence of nonlinear adjustment, which conforms to the exponential smooth transition model. There exists a huge literature, and it is growing in this area. However, the econometric methods and the formal theory have been limited. This paper proposes the tests for nonlinear adjustment in the smooth transition vector error correction models, and thereby fills the deficiency in the literature. One technical difficulty is to estimate the smooth transition model. As noted by Haggan and Ozaki (1981) and Terasvirta (1994), it is difficult to estimate the smooth transition parameters jointly with the other slope parameters. The gradient of the transition parameter forces its estimate to blow up to infinity; thus, we cannot depend on the standard estimation algorithm. Our tests are based on the Lagrange multiplier statistic, which can be calculated under the null hypothesis. Therefore, our tests are easy to implement and thus useful. This paper finds that our tests have the asymptotic distribution, which is based on the Gaussian process. However, the asymptotic distribution depends on the nuisance parameters and the covariances are data-dependent; thus, the tabulation of asymptotic distribution is not feasible. This paper suggests the bootstrap inference to approximate the sampling distribution of the test statistics. Simulation evidence shows that the bootstrap inference generates moderate size and power performances

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings with number 749.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:749
    Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
    Fax: 1 212 995 4487
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Bruce E. Hansen, 1996. "Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 319., Boston College Department of Economics, revised 12 May 1998.
    2. Bruce E. Hansen & Mehmet Caner, 1997. "Threshold Autoregressions with a Unit Root," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 381, Boston College Department of Economics.
    3. Donald W.K. Andrews & Werner Ploberger, 1992. "Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Only Under the Alternative," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1015, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Hansen, Bruce E. & Seo, Byeongseon, 2002. "Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error-correction models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 293-318, October.
    5. Saikkonen, Pentti & Choi, In, 2004. "Cointegrating Smooth Transition Regressions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(02), pages 301-340, April.
    6. Tse, Yiuman, 2001. "Index arbitrage with heterogeneous investors: A smooth transition error correction analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(10), pages 1829-1855, October.
    7. Engle, Robert & Granger, Clive, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    8. Enders, Walter & Granger, Clive W J, 1998. "Unit-Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 304-11, July.
    9. Nathan S. Balke & Thomas B. Fomby, 1992. "Threshold cointegration," Research Paper 9209, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
      • Balke, Nathan S & Fomby, Thomas B, 1997. "Threshold Cointegration," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 38(3), pages 627-45, August.
    10. Chang, Yoosoon & Park, Joon Y., 2003. "Index models with integrated time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 73-106, May.
    11. Donald W.K. Andrews, 1990. "Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 943, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Michael, Panos & Nobay, A Robert & Peel, David A, 1997. "Transactions Costs and Nonlinear Adjustment in Real Exchange Rates: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(4), pages 862-79, August.
    13. Hansen, B.E., 1991. "Inference when a Nuisance Parameter is Not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis," RCER Working Papers 296, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    14. Forbes, Catherine S & Kalb, Guyonne R J & Kofman, Paul, 1999. "Bayesian Arbitrage Threshold Analysis," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 17(3), pages 364-72, July.
    15. Dahl, Christian M. & Gonzalez-Rivera, Gloria, 2003. "Testing for neglected nonlinearity in regression models based on the theory of random fields," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 141-164, May.
    16. Dirk Te Velde, 2001. "Balance of payments prospects in EMU," NIESR Discussion Papers 178, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    17. Enders, Walter & Siklos, Pierre L, 2001. "Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 19(2), pages 166-76, April.
    18. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-38, May.
    19. Kapetanios, George & Shin, Yongcheol & Snell, Andy, 2003. "Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 359-379, February.
    20. Terasvirta, T & Anderson, H M, 1992. "Characterizing Nonlinearities in Business Cycles Using Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(S), pages S119-36, Suppl. De.
    21. Anderson, Heather M, 1997. "Transaction Costs and Non-linear Adjustment towards Equilibrium in the US Treasury Bill Market," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 59(4), pages 465-84, November.
    22. Johansen, Soren, 1988. "Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 12(2-3), pages 231-254.
    23. Robert B. Davies, 2002. "Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative: Linear model case," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(2), pages 484-489, June.
    24. Neftci, Salih N, 1984. "Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric over the Business Cycle?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 92(2), pages 307-28, April.
    25. Seo, Byeongseon, 1998. "Tests For Structural Change In Cointegrated Systems," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(02), pages 222-259, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.