IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Balance of payments prospects in EMU

The architects of monetary union believed that balance of payments constraints would no longer operate in EMU, but this view underestimates the fact that cross-border financing will still be subject to country credit risk - the risk of widespread debt default by residents of a troubled member state, including the possibilityof secession if serious economic tensions develop at some point. With these concerns in mind the prospects for current account balances of individual EU states are examined through forecasts and simulations using the NiGEM model. In addition special equations are estimated to allocate countries' global current balances between EMU and non-EMU areas, since intra-EMU imbalances are likely to have different financing implications from those with the world outside. The results suggest that whereas most EU states are likely to be in broad external balance or better through the next few years, several seem set to incur substantial current deficits, either with the rest of the area or with the world outside. Particularly at risk are Spain and the UK (whether inside or outside EMU) among the majors and Portugal and Greece among the smaller states. In general these prospects would not be radically affected by mild adverse shocks in the form of a reduction in global demand or a depreciation of the US dollar, assuming they would be unwound by efficient policy action overseas, but if large and protracted shocks were to occur, a number of states could develop deficits on a scale that could hardly be financed smoothly, even in the new regime.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by National Institute of Economic and Social Research in its series NIESR Discussion Papers with number 164.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:164
Contact details of provider: Postal: 2 Dean Trench Street Smith Square London SW1P 3HE
Web page: http://niesr.ac.uk

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Communications Manager)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.