IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/werepe/we101707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A distribution-free transform of the residuals sample autocorrelations with application to model checking

Author

Listed:
  • Delgado, Miguel A.
  • Velasco, Carlos

Abstract

We propose an asymptotically distribution-free transform of the sample autocorrelations of residuals in general parametric time series models, possibly non-linear in variables. The residuals autocorrelation function is the basic model checking tool in time series analysis, but it is useless when its distribution is incorrectly approximated because the effects of parameter estimation or of unnoticed higher order serial dependence have not been taken into account. The limiting distribution of residuals sample autocorrelations may be difficult to derive, particularly when the underlying innovations are not independent. However, the transformation we propose is easy to implement and the resulting transformed sample autocorrelations are asymptotically distributed as independent standard normals, providing an useful and intuitive device for model checking by taking over the role of the standard sample autocorrelations. We also discuss in detail alternatives to the classical Box-Pierce and Bartlett's Tp-process tests, showing that our transform entails no efficiency loss under Gaussianity. The finite sample performance of the procedures is examined in the context of a Monte Carlo experiment for the two goodness-of-fit tests discussed in the article. The proposed methodology is applied to modeling the autocovariance structure of the well known chemical process temperature reading data already used for the illustration of other statistical procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Delgado, Miguel A. & Velasco, Carlos, 2010. "A distribution-free transform of the residuals sample autocorrelations with application to model checking," UC3M Working papers. Economics we101707, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we101707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/7697/we101707.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delgado, Miguel A. & Hidalgo, Javier & Velasco, Carlos, 2005. "Distribution free goodness-of-fit tests for linear processes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Hong, Yongmiao, 1996. "Consistent Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 837-864, July.
    3. Lobato, I.N. & Nankervis, John C. & Savin, N.E., 2002. "Testing For Zero Autocorrelation In The Presence Of Statistical Dependence," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 730-743, June.
    4. Durbin, J, 1970. "Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 410-421, May.
    5. Robinson, Peter M. & Velasco, Carlos, 2000. "Whittle pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation for nonstationary time series," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Francq, Christian & Roy, Roch & Zakoian, Jean-Michel, 2005. "Diagnostic Checking in ARMA Models With Uncorrelated Errors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 532-544, June.
    7. Peter M Robinson & Carlos Velasco, 2000. "Whittle Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Nonstationary Time Series - (Now published in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, (2000), pp.1229-1243.)," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 391, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jia & Phillips, Peter C. B. & Shi, Shuping & Yu, Jun, 2022. "Weak Identification of Long Memory with Implications for Inference," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 8-2022, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    2. Guay, Alain & Guerre, Emmanuel & Lazarová, Štěpána, 2013. "Robust adaptive rate-optimal testing for the white noise hypothesis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 134-145.
    3. Zhang, Xianyang, 2016. "White noise testing and model diagnostic checking for functional time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 76-95.
    4. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2022. "Data-driven portmanteau tests for time series," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 675-698, September.
    5. Laura Mayoral, 2007. "Minimum distance estimation of stationary and non-stationary ARFIMA processes," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 10(1), pages 124-148, March.
    6. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, 2017. "Testing for Uncorrelated Residuals in Dynamic Count Models With an Application to Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 349-358, July.
    7. Li, Muyi & Zhang, Yanfen, 2022. "Bootstrapping multivariate portmanteau tests for vector autoregressive models with weak assumptions on errors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Li, Linyuan & Duchesne, Pierre & Liou, Chu Pheuil, 2021. "On diagnostic checking in ARMA models with conditionally heteroscedastic martingale difference using wavelet methods," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 169-187.
    9. Carlos Velasco & Xuexin Wang, 2015. "A Joint Portmanteau Test For Conditional Mean And Variance Time-Series Models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 39-60, January.
    10. Zhu, Ke & Li, Wai Keung, 2015. "A bootstrapped spectral test for adequacy in weak ARMA models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 113-130.
    11. Escanciano, J. Carlos & Lobato, Ignacio N., 2009. "An automatic Portmanteau test for serial correlation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 140-149, August.
    12. Francq, Christian & Zakoïan, Jean-Michel, 2007. "HAC estimation and strong linearity testing in weak ARMA models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 114-144, January.
    13. Hill, Jonathan B. & Motegi, Kaiji, 2019. "Testing the white noise hypothesis of stock returns," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 231-242.
    14. repec:wyi:journl:002087 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Robinson, Peter M. & Velasco, Carlos, 2015. "Efficient inference on fractionally integrated panel data models with fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 435-452.
    16. Hidalgo, Javier, 2009. "Goodness of fit for lattice processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(2), pages 113-128, August.
    17. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Luis A. Gil-Alana & Alex Plastun, 2017. "Long Memory and Data Frequency in Financial Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 6396, CESifo.
    18. Dalla, Violetta & Giraitis, Liudas & Phillips, Peter C. B., 2022. "Robust Tests For White Noise And Cross-Correlation," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(5), pages 913-941, October.
    19. Guglielmo Caporale & Luis Gil-Alana, 2014. "Fractional integration and cointegration in US financial time series data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1389-1410, December.
    20. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Gil-Alana, Luis & Plastun, Alex, 2018. "Is market fear persistent? A long-memory analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 140-147.
    21. Adrian Wai-Kong Cheung & Jen-Je Su & Astrophel Kim Choo, 2011. "Are Euro exchange rates markets efficient? New evidence from a large panel," Discussion Papers in Finance finance:201109, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Residuals autocorrelation function;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:werepe:we101707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eco.uc3m.es/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.