IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csa/wpaper/1999-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aid intensity in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen A. O'Connell
  • Charles C. Soludo

Abstract

The countries of Sub-Saharan Africa are disproportionately among those receiving the most foreign aid per capita in the world. In this paper we assess the intensity of aid flows to African countries, defined as the size of these flows relative to the categories of economic activity they are designed to support. In the process we provide a critical overview of standard measures of aid and place the flows currently being received by African countries in a cross-country and intertemporal perspective. We draw examples throughout from Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Mali, Mozambique, Uganda and Zambia—seven countries whose aid experience spans that of Sub-Saharan Africa and will subsequently be the subject of intensive study.1 Measured relative to recipient GNP, the median value of aid to African countries now stands at nearly 10 times the amount received by Western Europe under the Marshall Plan. While a presumption in favor of fundamental effects on welfare and institutions seems uncontestible, the term “aid intensity” is deliberately neutral. For most of the paper we steer clear of concepts like “aid effectiveness” and “aid dependence” that presuppose a behavioral analysis of the aid relationship. While intensity and effectiveness may be closely related under particular circumstances, the two are clearly distinct. Burnside and Dollar (1996)), for example, find that when countries of disparate institutional and policy environments are pooled together, there is no systematic relationship between the intensity of aid and its effectiveness in raising the recipient’s economic growth rate. Aid dependence is a murkier concept that is often directly conflated with aid intensity, as by the World Bank in its annual World Development Indicators.2 But this ignores the essentially intertemporal nature of dependency while implicitly locating dependency in the recipient rather than the donor. The disparate experiences of countries like Botswana and Uganda bring out a clear distinction between the level and evolution of aid intensity and suggest that case-specific features may overwhelm any mechanical link between the two. We return to these issues at the end of the paper. The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD is the main source of comprehensive and internationally comparable data on aid flows. The DAC’s concept of “official development assistance” (ODA) is widely used in international comparisons, and we begin in section 1 with an overview of recent trends in ODA. Section 2 places the ODA measure in a macroeconomic accounting context and discusses its strengths and weaknesses as a measure of aid receipts. With caveats in place, we move on in section 3 to study the resource intensity of aid and its evolution over time. Measuring aid aggregates relative to GNP, population, imports, investment, and government spending, we compare regional medians and rank the case study countries relative to the full sample. Five of the seven case study countries, and by some measures the African median, fall into the upper quartile of aid intensity in the 1990s, a category we identify as “highly aid intensive.” We then observe that a country’s aid ratios can be high in an absolute sense but low relative to what would have been expected given the country’s structural characteristics. We present adjusted rankings that control for population and real income per capita, and speculate about what can be learned from the differences between these and the raw rankings. In section 4 we make a distinction between the resource intensity of aid flows and their transactions intensity. This distinction is central to the HIPC Initiative and further heightens the presumption of high aid intensity in Africa. Section 5 concludes the paper with a summary of our main findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A. O'Connell & Charles C. Soludo, 1999. "Aid intensity in Africa," CSAE Working Paper Series 1999-03, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1999-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/9903text.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Paul Azam & Shantayanan Devarajan & Stephen A. O'Connell, 1999. "Aid dependence reconsidered," CSAE Working Paper Series 1999-05, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    2. Yeats, Alexander J, 1990. "Do African Countries Pay More for Imports? Yes," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Boone, Peter, 1996. "Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 289-329, February.
    4. Easterly, William, 1999. "The ghost of financing gap: testing the growth model used in the international financial institutions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 423-438, December.
    5. David Dollar & Craig Burnside, 2000. "Aid, Policies, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 847-868, September.
    6. Robert Summers & Alan Heston, 1991. "The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 106(2), pages 327-368.
    7. Elbadawi, Ibrahim A, 1999. "External Aid: Help or Hindrance to Export Orientation in Africa?," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 8(4), pages 578-616, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:epplan:v:68:y:2018:i:c:p:225-232 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. World Bank, 2003. "Toward Country-led Development : A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework--Synthesis Report," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 15080, September.
    3. Iñaki Aldasoro & Peter Nunnenkamp & Rainer Thiele, 2010. "Less aid proliferation and more donor coordination? The wide gap between words and deeds," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(7), pages 920-940.
    4. Kimura, Hidemi & Mori, Yuko & Sawada, Yasuyuki, 2012. "Aid Proliferation and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 1-10.
    5. Knack, Stephen & Rahman, Aminur, 2007. "Donor fragmentation and bureaucratic quality in aid recipients," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 176-197, May.
    6. Kilby, Christopher, 2005. "Donor Influence in MDBs: the Case of the Asian Development Bank," Vassar College Department of Economics Working Paper Series 70, Vassar College Department of Economics.
    7. Bigsten, Arne, 2006. "Donor coordination and the uses of aid," Working Papers in Economics 196, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    8. Christopher Kilby, 2006. "Donor influence in multilateral development banks: The case of the Asian Development Bank," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 173-195, June.
    9. Knack, Stephen, 2002. "Governance and growth: measurement and evidence," MPRA Paper 28050, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Nicholas Staines, 2004. "Economic Performance Over the Conflict Cycle," IMF Working Papers 04/95, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Pallas, Sarah Wood & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2017. "Effects of donor proliferation in development aid for health on health program performance: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 177-186.
    12. Knack, Stephen & Rahman, Aminur, 2008. "Donor fragmentation," MPRA Paper 28043, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:1999-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Julia Coffey). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.