IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/17649.html

Big Techs vs Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Gambacorta, Leonardo
  • Khalil, Fahad
  • Parigi, Bruno

Abstract

We study an economy in which large technology companies (big techs) provide credit to firms operating on their platforms. We focus on the trade-off between privacy and efficiency in the interaction between big tech and bank lending. Big techs have access to troves of data on firms who trade on their platforms. This reduces privacy for their clients but results in more efficient use of client-risk information curtailing strategic defaults in an environment with limited enforcement. Bank loans offer greater privacy but must break even on average across different risks, resulting in inefficient defaults by solvent rms. Furthermore, big techs also have stronger enforcement of credit repayment since they can exclude a defaulter from their ecosystem. Fearing expropriation of their continuation values, firms will not borrow from an all too powerful big tech that has superior information as well as superior enforcement. Competitive privacy offered by big techs can attract intermediate-risk types and eliminate inefficient defaults, where the safest firms prefer to enjoy information rent on a bank loan. The way big techs share information, i.e., by providing information publicly or in a private way, entails different outcomes in terms of efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Gambacorta, Leonardo & Khalil, Fahad & Parigi, Bruno, 2022. "Big Techs vs Banks," CEPR Discussion Papers 17649, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/publications/DP17649
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Iulia-Monica Oehler-Șincai & Claudia Gabriela Baicu & Sorin-Nicolae Curcă, 2022. "Fragmentation and Concentration within the International Payments, System – Risks, Challenges, Opportunities," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 10(2), pages 35-45, December.
    3. Yanfei Dong & Jiayin Hu & Yiping Huang & Han Qiu & Yingguang Zhang, 2025. "The use and disuse of FinTech credit: When buy-now-pay-later meets credit reporting," BIS Working Papers 1239, Bank for International Settlements.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:17649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.