IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/col/000547/017668.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Guía de evaluación. ¿Cómo evaluar la efectividad de una política que busque hacer estratégica la gestión del talento humano en el sector público colombiano?

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Sanabria
  • Paula Cuéllar
  • Alejandra Rodas
  • Mauricio Astudillo
  • Sebastián Estrada
  • Juan Sebastián González

Abstract

Este Documento de Trabajo ofrece una metodología de evaluación (monitoreo, seguimiento y evaluación) de una eventual política que esté orientada a hacer estratégica la gestión del talento humano en el sector público colombiano. Estos lineamientos se enfocan en brindar los elementos necesarios para evaluar el alcance de una serie de recomendaciones, presentadas en documentos anteriores (Ver Documentos de Trabajo 18 y 26), que tienen como fin fortalecer el rol actual de la gestión de personas en las organizaciones públicas. Este documento ofrece una metodología integrada de monitoreo, seguimiento y evaluación para una eventual política de gestión del talento humano. Este documento de trabajo es producto de las actividades desarrolladas como parte del proyecto de investigación titulado "Proyecto de investigación para formular las bases del diseno, implementación y evaluación de una política integral, que promueva la innovación y la efectividad en la administración gestión del talento humano en el sector público" financiado por la Escuela Superior de Administración Pública ESAP, con el apoyo del Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública DAFP y Colciencias. ***** This working paper provides an evaluation methodology for an eventual policy aimed at making more strategic the human capital management of Colombian public organizations. These guidelines focus on providing the necessary elements to assess the recommendations contained in previous documents (See Working Paper EGOB 18 and 26) aimed at strengthening the role that human capital management plays within the public sector. This document provides an integrated methodology of monitoring, tracking and evaluation for a future substantive public policy on this topic. This working paper is the result of a research project funded by the Higher School of Public Administration (ESAP by its Spanish acronym), with the support of the Administrative Department of Civil Service (DAFP by its Acronym in Spanish) and the Administrative Department for Science and Technology of Colombia (COLCIENCIAS).

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Sanabria & Paula Cuéllar & Alejandra Rodas & Mauricio Astudillo & Sebastián Estrada & Juan Sebastián González, 2016. "Guía de evaluación. ¿Cómo evaluar la efectividad de una política que busque hacer estratégica la gestión del talento humano en el sector público colombiano?," Documentos de trabajo 17668, Escuela de Gobierno - Universidad de los Andes.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000547:017668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://egob.uniandes.edu.co/images/No27_evaluacion.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769.
    2. Wolpin, Kenneth I., 2013. "The Limits of Inference without Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019086, December.
    3. Marelize Gorgens & Jody Zall Kusek, 2009. "Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work : A Capacity Development Toolkit," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2702.
    4. Flamholtz, Eric, 1976. "The impact of human resource valuation on management decisions: A laboratory experiment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(2-3), pages 153-165, June.
    5. White, Howard, 2009. "Theory-Based Impact Evaluation," 3ie Publications 2009-3, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
    6. Kerry Brown, 2004. "Human resource management in the public sector," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 303-309, September.
    7. Helen Z. Margetts, 2011. "Experiments for Public Management Research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 189-208, February.
    8. Howard White, 2009. "Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 271-284.
    9. Shahidur R. Khandker & Gayatri B. Koolwal & Hussain A. Samad, 2010. "Handbook on Impact Evaluation : Quantitative Methods and Practices," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2693.
    10. Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal, 2001. "The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case-Control Study for the Basque Country," NBER Working Papers 8478, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gwenolé Le Velly & Céline Dutilly, 2016. "Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Pablo Vidueira & José M. Díaz-Puente & María Rivera, 2014. "Socioeconomic Impact Assessment in Ex Ante Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 309-335, August.
    3. Johnson, Nancy L. & Atherstone, Christine & Grace, Delia, 2015. "The potential of farm-level technologies and practices to contribute to reducing consumer exposure to aflatoxins: A theory of change analysis:," IFPRI discussion papers 1452, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Sara Rafael Almeida & Joana Sousa Lourenco & Francois J. Dessart & Emanuele Ciriolo, 2017. "Insights from behavioural sciences to prevent and combat violence against women. Literature review," JRC Research Reports JRC103975, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Quentin Ssossé & Johanna Wagner & Carina Hopper, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of ESD: Methods, Challenges, Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Joana Silva Afonso, 2020. "Impact evaluation, social performance assessment and standardisation: reflections from microfinance evaluations in Pakistan and Zimbabwe," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2020-14, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    7. Guilherme Mendes Resende & Ricardo Carvalho de Andrade Lima, 2018. "Working Paper 01/2018 - Competition Effects of the Sharing Economy in Brazil: Has Uber's entry affected the cab-hailing app market from 2014 to 2016?," Documentos de Trabalho 2018011, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    8. Calina-Ana Butiu, 2017. "Evidence based practice in academic dropout policy. The pro-integra model," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 3-12.
    9. Mahoukede, Kinkingninhoun-Medagbe & Aliou, Diagne & Rita A., Agboh-Noameshie, 2015. "Impact of NERICA Adoption on Productivity and Income in Benin: Is There Gender Difference?," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211634, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Edward Olale & Emmanuel K. Yiridoe & Thomas O. Ochuodho & Van Lantz, 2019. "The Effect of Carbon Tax on Farm Income: Evidence from a Canadian Province," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 605-623, October.
    11. Yonatan Eyal, 2020. "Self-Assessment Variables as a Source of Information in the Evaluation of Intervention Programs: A Theoretical and Methodological Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    12. Gala D�az Langou & Vanesa Weyrauch, 2013. "Sound expectations: from impact evaluations to policy change," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 269-304, September.
    13. Liu, Zhaoyang & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2018. "Meta-Analysis of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services Programmes in Developing Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 48-61.
    14. Boris E. Bravo-Ureta, 2014. "Stochastic frontiers, productivity effects and development projects," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 51-58.
    15. Hughes, Karl & Morgan, Seth & Baylis, Katherine & Oduol, Judith & Smith-Dumont, Emilie & Vågen, Tor-Gunnar & Kegode, Hilda, 2020. "Assessing the downstream socioeconomic impacts of agroforestry in Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Isnawati Hidayah & Imam Mukhlis, 2019. "Dana Desa on clean water and sanitation access in Indonesia: Does Cash-for-work (PKT) matter?," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 9512011, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    17. John Gaventa & Rosemary McGee, 2013. "The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 3-28, July.
    18. Varghese, Rekha & Roy, Manan, 2019. "Coresidence with mother-in-law and maternal anemia in rural India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 37-46.
    19. Hansen, Marc, 2013. "Aid's Incomplete Trial: reconsidering the aid-growth paradigm in the macro aid effectiveness literature," IEE Working Papers 200, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE).
    20. Gaarder, Marie M. & Bartsch, Ulrich, 2014. "The second wave of independence : shopping for solutions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7069, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000547:017668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alejandra Rojas Forero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/egandco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.