IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Informalidad empresarial en Colombia: alternativas para impulsar la productividd, el empleo y los ingresos

Listed author(s):
  • Mauricio Santa María S.


  • Sandra Rozo V.


Este documento estudia los determinantes de la informalidad empresarial en Colombia. El análisis se realiza tanto cuantitativa, como cualitativamente. El primero se desarrolla con base en el Censo Empresarial de Cali y Yumbo - 2005, el cual permite estudiar por primera vez la incidencia y los determinantes de la informalidad en empresas de cualquier tamaño. Los resultados indican que, en las microempresas, la informalidad es un fenómeno generalizado y que, en muchos casos, tiende a desvanecerse con el crecimiento de las empresas. Por otra parte, dentro del grupo de empresas grandes y medianas la informalidad obedece a otro tipo de factores, entre los que se destacan los altos costos de la formalidad y el desconocimiento de los beneficios a operar formalmente. Por otro lado, el análisis cualitativo se desarrolla con base a sesiones de grupo dirigidas a empresarios formales e informales, lo cual facilita estudiar aspectos que no pueden ser identificados sólo con análisis de cifras y estadísticas. Con base a los resultados de estos ejercicios, combinados con un análisis exhaustivo de los incentivos gubernamentales y una descripción de la experiencia internacional en torno a este fenómeno, se formula un grupo de recomendaciones de política dirigidas a aumentar los niveles de productividad empresarial en el país y, por esta vía, incrementar los niveles de empleo formal y de ingresos de los trabajadores y de sus familias. Éstas están orientadas principalmente a aumentar los beneficios netos de la formalidad.Abstract: This document studies the determinants of firm informality in Colombia based both on a quantitative and a qualitative approach. The former is carried out using the Cali and Yumbo Enterprise Census for the year 2005, which allowed, for the first time, to analyze informality over firms of any size. Estimations show that incidence of informality among of small firms (microempresas") is strikingly large and, many times, tends to disappear with its growth. Informality in larger firms, on the other hand, is associated to other factors, such as high formality costs and lack of knowledge about the benefits of being formal. The qualitative analysis was carried out based on a series of focus groups directed to informal and formal employers. These sessions facilitated the identification of their perceptions around this phenomenon, providing important "unobserved" clues as to why are they formal or informal. Based on the results of these exercises, plus the analyses of international experience and some governmental incentives related to informality, some policy recommendations were formulated to increase the pace of productivity growth in Colombia and, through this channel, to increase formal employment and labor incomes. These recommendations seek to raise the net benefits of formality in Colombia."

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by FEDESARROLLO in its series WORKING PAPERS SERIES. DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO with number 009189.

in new window

Length: 73
Date of creation: 12 Mar 2008
Handle: RePEc:col:000123:009189
Contact details of provider:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Mauricio Cárdenas & Carolina Mejía M., 2007. "Informalidad en Colombia: nueva evidencia," COYUNTURA ECONÓMICA, FEDESARROLLO, December.
  2. Friedrich Schneider & Dominik Enste, 1999. "Shadow Economies Around the World - Size, Causes, and Consequences," CESifo Working Paper Series 196, CESifo Group Munich.
  3. Dominik H. Enste & Friedrich Schneider, 2000. "Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(1), pages 77-114, March.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000123:009189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lucía Fenney Pérez)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.