IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cmf/wpaper/wp2022_2214.html

Labor Market Power Across Cities

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Workers in larger cities are paid higher wages. The city-size wage premium may reflect the productivity gains from agglomeration or sorting of more productive workers in densely populated areas. However, local labor markets in large cities have more firms and are expected to be more competitive, which could also generate part of the urban earnings premium. I quantify the importance of this channel with rich administrative data for Spain using a spatial equilibrium model to guide the empirical strategy. To address the identification challenge posed by labor market power and wages moving endogenously with unobserved local productivity shocks, I first control for firms’ revenues per worker and for time trends that are heterogeneous across local labor markets. I then develop a new instrumental variable that leverages quasi-experimental variation in monopsony power stemming from changes over time in the size of local public firms. I conclude that 20–30% of the city-size wage premium and 6–15% of the employment gap between small and large cities can be attributed to differences in labor market power across locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Luccioletti, 2022. "Labor Market Power Across Cities," Working Papers wp2022_2214, CEMFI.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmf:wpaper:wp2022_2214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/wp/2214.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Berry & Martin Gaynor & Fiona Scott Morton, 2019. "Do Increasing Markups Matter? Lessons from Empirical Industrial Organization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 44-68, Summer.
    2. Pierre-Philippe Combes & Gilles Duranton & Laurent Gobillon, 2011. "The identification of agglomeration economies," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 253-266, March.
    3. Kneip, Alois & Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho, 2012. "A New Panel Data Treatment For Heterogeneity In Time Trends," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 590-628, June.
    4. Bernard, Andrew B. & Bradford Jensen, J., 1999. "Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Ben Lipsius, 2018. "Labor Market Concentration does not Explain the Falling Labor Share," 2018 Papers pli1202, Job Market Papers.
    6. Efraim Benmelech & Nittai K. Bergman & Hyunseob Kim, 2022. "Strong Employers and Weak Employees: How Does Employer Concentration Affect Wages?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(S), pages 200-250.
    7. Bada, Oualid & Liebl, Dominik, 2014. "phtt: Panel Data Analysis with Heterogeneous Time Trends in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halvarsson, Daniel & Korpi, Martin, 2025. "City size, employer concentration, and wage income inequality," Working Paper Series 2025:4, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    2. Mayneris, Florian, 2025. "Does the urban wage premium imply a higher firms’ labor share in big cities?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Eloiza Almeida & Veneziano Araújo & Solange Gonçalves, 2025. "The urban wage premium in a labor market with informality," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(2), pages 1-28, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderlik Jasmin & Jumaniyozova Malika & Schmidpeter Bernhard & Winter-Ebmer Rudolf, 2025. "Monopsony: Wages, Wage Bargaining and Job Requirements," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 26(4), pages 395-420.
    2. Kahn, Matthew E. & Tracy, Joseph, 2024. "Monopsony in spatial equilibrium," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Gregor Jarosch & Jan Sebastian Nimczik & Isaac Sorkin, 2024. "Granular Search, Market Structure, and Wages," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3569-3607.
    4. Yifan Chen & Sean Wilkoff & Jiro Yoshida, 2024. "Amazon is coming to town: Sequential information revelation in the housing market," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 52(2), pages 277-323, March.
    5. Gregor Jarosch & Isaac Sorkin & Jan Sebastian Nimczik, 2019. "Granular Search, Concentration and Wages," 2019 Meeting Papers 1018, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    6. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    7. Datta, Nikhil, 2024. "Local monopsony power," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126772, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Holt, Andrew Chase, 2024. "Monopsony power in the United States: Evidence from the great depression," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Elizabeth Weber Handwerker & Matthew Dey, 2024. "Some facts about concentrated labor markets in the United States," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 132-151, April.
    10. Roman Matkovskyy, 2016. "A comparison of pre- and post-crisis efficiency of OECD countries: evidence from a model with temporal heterogeneity in time and unobservable individual effect," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 13(2), pages 135-167, December.
    11. Kali, Raja & Liu, Andrew Yizhou, 2024. "Labor market power and worker turnover," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Balmaceda, Felipe, 2025. "Occupational mismatch and market power," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Brummund, Peter & Makowsky, Michael D., 2024. "Monopsony and Local Religious Clubs: Evidence from Indonesia," IZA Discussion Papers 16999, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Sara Calligaris & Chiara Criscuolo & Josh De Lyon & Andrea Greppi & Oliviero Pallanch & Miguel Chaves, 2024. "Industry concentration in Europe: Trends and methodological insights," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2024/06, OECD Publishing.
    15. Yue Qiu & Aaron Sojourner, 2023. "Labor-Market Concentration and Labor Compensation," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(3), pages 475-503, May.
    16. Albert Jan Hummel, 2021. "Monopsony power, income taxation and welfare," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-051/VI, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Qiao Guangshun, 2023. "Survival of the Fittest: The Long-run Productivity Analysis of the Listed Information Technology Companies in the US Stock Market," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, January.
    18. Jonathan Hambur, 2023. "Did Labour Market Concentration Lower Wages Growth Pre-COVID?," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2023-02, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    19. Anderton, Robert & Jarvis, Valerie & Labhard, Vincent & Morgan, Julian & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vivian, Lara, 2020. "Virtually everywhere? Digitalisation and the euro area and EU economies," Occasional Paper Series 244, European Central Bank.
    20. Popp, Martin, 2024. "Minimum Wages in Concentrated Labor Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 17357, IZA Network @ LISER.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
    • J42 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmf:wpaper:wp2022_2214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Araceli Requerey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemfies.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.