IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cmf/wpaper/wp2022_2214.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labor Market Power Across Cities

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Workers in larger cities are paid higher wages. The city-size wage premium may reflect the productivity gains from agglomeration or sorting of more productive workers in densely populated areas. However, local labor markets in large cities have more firms and are expected to be more competitive, which could also generate part of the urban earnings premium. I quantify the importance of this channel with rich administrative data for Spain using a spatial equilibrium model to guide the empirical strategy. To address the identification challenge posed by labor market power and wages moving endogenously with unobserved local productivity shocks, I first control for firms’ revenues per worker and for time trends that are heterogeneous across local labor markets. I then develop a new instrumental variable that leverages quasi-experimental variation in monopsony power stemming from changes over time in the size of local public firms. I conclude that 20–30% of the city-size wage premium and 6–15% of the employment gap between small and large cities can be attributed to differences in labor market power across locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Luccioletti, 2022. "Labor Market Power Across Cities," Working Papers wp2022_2214, CEMFI.
  • Handle: RePEc:cmf:wpaper:wp2022_2214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cemfi.es/ftp/wp/2214.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard, Andrew B. & Bradford Jensen, J., 1999. "Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Steven Berry & Martin Gaynor & Fiona Scott Morton, 2019. "Do Increasing Markups Matter? Lessons from Empirical Industrial Organization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 44-68, Summer.
    3. Efraim Benmelech & Nittai K. Bergman & Hyunseob Kim, 2022. "Strong Employers and Weak Employees: How Does Employer Concentration Affect Wages?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(S), pages 200-250.
    4. Kneip, Alois & Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho, 2012. "A New Panel Data Treatment For Heterogeneity In Time Trends," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 590-628, June.
    5. Pierre-Philippe Combes & Gilles Duranton & Laurent Gobillon, 2011. "The identification of agglomeration economies," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 253-266, March.
    6. Ben Lipsius, 2018. "Labor Market Concentration does not Explain the Falling Labor Share," 2018 Papers pli1202, Job Market Papers.
    7. Bada, Oualid & Liebl, Dominik, 2014. "phtt: Panel Data Analysis with Heterogeneous Time Trends in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudolf Winter-Ebmer & Jasmin Anderlik & Malika Jumaniyozova & Bernhard Schmidpeter, 2024. "Monopsony: Wages, wage bargaining and job requirements," Economics working papers 2024-15, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    2. Kahn, Matthew E. & Tracy, Joseph, 2024. "Monopsony in spatial equilibrium," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Gregor Jarosch & Jan Sebastian Nimczik & Isaac Sorkin, 2024. "Granular Search, Market Structure, and Wages," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3569-3607.
    4. Junrong Liu & Robin C. Sickles & E. G. Tsionas, 2017. "Bayesian Treatments for Panel Data Stochastic Frontier Models with Time Varying Heterogeneity," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Yifan Chen & Sean Wilkoff & Jiro Yoshida, 2024. "Amazon is coming to town: Sequential information revelation in the housing market," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 52(2), pages 277-323, March.
    6. Gregor Jarosch & Isaac Sorkin & Jan Sebastian Nimczik, 2019. "Granular Search, Concentration and Wages," 2019 Meeting Papers 1018, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Steven Berry & Martin Gaynor & Fiona Scott Morton, 2019. "Do Increasing Markups Matter? Lessons from Empirical Industrial Organization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 44-68, Summer.
    8. Sickles, Robin C. & Song, Wonho & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2018. "Econometric Analysis of Productivity: Theory and Implementation in R," Working Papers 18-008, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    9. Liu, Hao, 2019. "The communication and European Regional economic growth: The interactive fixed effects approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 299-311.
    10. Salvanes, Kjell G & Dodini, Samuel & Lovenheim, Michael F. & Willén, Alexander, 2020. "Monopsony, Skills, and Labor Market Concentration," CEPR Discussion Papers 15412, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Kevin Rinz, 2022. "Did Timing Matter? Life Cycle Differences in Effects of Exposure to the Great Recession," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(3), pages 703-735.
    12. Holt, Andrew Chase, 2024. "Monopsony power in the United States: Evidence from the great depression," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Salvanes, Kjell G & Dodini, Samuel & Willén, Alexander, 2021. "The Dynamics of Power in Labor Markets: Monopolistic Unions versus Monopsonistic Employers," CEPR Discussion Papers 16834, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Elizabeth Weber Handwerker & Matthew Dey, 2024. "Some facts about concentrated labor markets in the United States," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 132-151, April.
    15. Roman Matkovskyy, 2016. "A comparison of pre- and post-crisis efficiency of OECD countries: evidence from a model with temporal heterogeneity in time and unobservable individual effect," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 13(2), pages 135-167, December.
    16. Riccardo Crescenzi & Roberto Ganau & Michael Storper, 2022. "Does foreign investment hurt job creation at home? The geography of outward FDI and employment in the USA," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 53-79.
    17. Sebastian Linde, 2023. "Hospital cost efficiency: an examination of US acute care inpatient hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 325-344, September.
    18. Azar, José & Marinescu, Ioana & Steinbaum, Marshall & Taska, Bledi, 2020. "Concentration in US labor markets: Evidence from online vacancy data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Kali, Raja & Liu, Andrew Yizhou, 2024. "Labor market power and worker turnover," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Bao Hoang Nguyen & Robin C. Sickles & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2021. "What do we know from the vast literature on efficiency and productivity in healthcare? A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," CEPA Working Papers Series WP092021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor market power; city sizes; wage premium.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
    • J42 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmf:wpaper:wp2022_2214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Araceli Requerey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemfies.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.