IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Law versus Regulation: A Political Economy Model of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy

Listed author(s):
  • Marcel Boyer
  • Donatella Porrini

We analyze the conditions under which a legal intervention can be compared to a regulatory framework in the context of a political economy model of environmental policy. The first part of the paper describes the characteristics of the different instruments we want to compare: first, an assignment of legal liability, focusing on the case of extended lender liability, and second, an incentive regulation framework. We briefly describe the application of those instruments in the United States and Europe. In the second part a formal economy model is presented where the possibility of capture of the regulatory agency is modeled in a reduced-form fashion through an overvaluation of the social value of the informational rent of the firms. We show that compared with an extended, strict, joint and several liability system, a regulatory system may perform better or worse from a welfare point of view. Three factors underlying this comparison are discussed in some depth, namely the differential cost between low and high levels of environmental protection activities, the social cost of public funds and the overvaluation factor. Nous analysons les conditions sous lesquelles les approches légale et réglementaire peuvent être comparées dans le cadre d'un modèle d'économie politique de l'implémentation de la politique environnementale. La première partie de l'article décrit les caractéristiques essentielles des divers instruments à comparer, à savoir un régime de responsabilité légale élargie aux prêteurs et un régime de réglementation incitative, instruments typiquement utilisés aux États-Unis et en Europe. Dans la deuxième partie, un modèle formel d'économie politique est développé. La possibilité d'une capture de l'agence de réglementation est introduite sous forme réduite par la surévaluation de la valeur sociale de la rente informationnelle des entreprises. Nous montrons qu'un régime de réglementation incitative peut être plus ou moins performant en termes de bien-être qu'un régime de responsabilité élargie, stricte et solidaire. Nous analysons en profondeur trois facteurs principaux de cette comparaison, à savoir le différentiel de coût entre les niveaux faible et élevé de la protection environnementale, le coût social des fonds publics et le facteur de surévaluation.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by CIRANO in its series CIRANO Working Papers with number 2000s-57.

in new window

Length: 41 pages
Date of creation: 01 Nov 2000
Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2000s-57
Contact details of provider: Postal:
1130 rue Sherbrooke Ouest, suite 1400, Montréal, Quéc, H3A 2M8

Phone: (514) 985-4000
Fax: (514) 985-4039
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. BOYER, Marcel, 1995. "Environmental Protection Producer Insolvency and Lender Liability," Cahiers de recherche 9557, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
  2. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1995. "Regulation, moral hazard and insurance of environmental risks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 319-336, November.
  3. Peter S. Menell, 1991. "The Limitations of Legal Institutions for Addressing Environmental Risks," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 93-113, Summer.
  4. Boyd, James & Ingberman, Daniel E, 1997. "The Search for Deep Pockets: Is "Extended Liability" Expensive Liability?," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 232-258, April.
  5. GOBERT, Karine & POITEVIN, Michel, 1998. "Environmental Risk: Should Banks Be Liable?," Cahiers de recherche 9808, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
  6. Boyer, Marcel & Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1997. "Environmental risks and bank liability," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1427-1459, August.
  7. Buchanan, James M, 1969. "External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes, and Market Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 174-177, March.
  8. Hahn, Robert W, 1990. "The Political Economy of Environmental Regulation: Towards a Unifying Framework," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 21-47, April.
  9. Dionne, Georges & Spaeter, Sandrine, 2003. "Environmental risk and extended liability: The case of green technologies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(5-6), pages 1025-1060, May.
  10. Marcel Boyer & Tracy R. Lewis & Wei Lin Liu, 2000. "Setting standards for credible compliance and law enforcement," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 319-340, May.
  11. Heyes, Anthony G, 1996. "Lender Penalty for Environmental Damage and the Equilibrium Cost of Capital," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 63(250), pages 311-323, May.
  12. Pitchford, Rohan, 1995. "How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(5), pages 1171-1186, December.
  13. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
  14. Kornhauser, Lewis A & Revesz, Richard L, 1994. "Multidefendant Settlements under Joint and Several Liability: The Problem of Insolvency," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 517-542, January.
  15. Karine Gobert, 1999. "Responsabilité des créanciers en matière environnementale," CIRANO Project Reports 1999rp-12, CIRANO.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2000s-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Webmaster)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.