IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/25-77.html

Specialization in a Knowledge Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Yueyuan Ma

Abstract

Using firm-level data from the US Census Longitudinal Business Database (LBD), this paper exhibits novel evidence about a wave of specialization experienced by US firms in the 1980s and 1990s. Specifically: (i) Firms, especially innovating ones, decreased production scope, i.e., the number of industries in which they produce. (ii) Innovation and production separated, with small firms specializing in innovation and large firms in production. Higher patent trading efficiency and stronger patent protection are proposed to explain these phenomena. An endogenous growth model is developed with potential mismatches between innovation and production. Calibrating the model suggests that increased trading efficiency and better patent protection can explain 20% of the observed production scope decrease and 108% of the innovation and production separation. They result in a 0.64 percent point increase in the annual economic growth rate. Empirical analyses provide evidence of causality from pro-patent reforms in the 1980s to the two specialization patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Yueyuan Ma, 2025. "Specialization in a Knowledge Economy," Working Papers 25-77, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:25-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/library/working-papers/2025/adrm/ces/CES-WP-25-77.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnaud Costinot & Lindsay Oldenski & James Rauch, 2011. "Adaptation and the Boundary of Multinational Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 298-308, February.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Timo Boppart & Peter J Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2023. "A Theory of Falling Growth and Rising Rents," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 2675-2702.
    4. Ufuk Akcigit & Murat Alp Celik & Jeremy Greenwood, 2016. "Buy, Keep, or Sell: Economic Growth and the Market for Ideas," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 943-984, May.
    5. Andrew Atkeson & Ariel Burstein, 2019. "Aggregate Implications of Innovation Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2625-2683.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hager Saleh & Ibrahim Mohammed Amidu & Zerin Ziaudeen & Ryan James Walker & Manal Younus, 2026. "Pharmacovigilance Through Fresh Eyes: The International Society of Pharmacovigilance Student Community's Role in Shaping the Future of Pharmacovigilance," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 259-262, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jo, Karam & Kim, Seula, 2024. "Heterogeneous Innovations and Growth Under Imperfect Technology Spillovers," IZA Discussion Papers 17581, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Karam Jo & Seula Kim, 2024. "Competition, Firm Innovation, and Growth under Imperfect Technology Spillovers," Working Papers 24-40, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Shah, Rohan, 2025. "Boosting innovation or entry: What increases output more?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Diana Dimitrova, 2018. "The 2018 Nobel Prize in Economics," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 98-152.
    5. M. D. Beneish & C. R. Harvey & A. Tseng & P. Vorst, 2022. "Unpatented innovation and merger synergies," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 706-744, June.
    6. Giuseppe Berlingieri & Maarten De Ridder & Danial Lashkari & Davide Rigo, 2025. "Creative destruction through innovation bursts," CEP Discussion Papers dp2095, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Colin Davis & Laixun Zhao, 2022. "Innovation to Keep or to Sell and Tax Incentives," Discussion Paper Series DP2022-28, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Nov 2022.
    8. Michael Peters, 2020. "Heterogeneous Markups, Growth, and Endogenous Misallocation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(5), pages 2037-2073, September.
    9. Garcia-Macia, Daniel & Korosteleva, Julia, 2025. "Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    10. Lorenz Ekerdt, 2024. "The Role of R&D Factors in Economic Growth," Working Papers 24-69, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    11. Madsen, Jakob & Minniti, Antonio & Venturini, Francesco, 2024. "Declining research productivity and income inequality: A centenary perspective," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Nieto-Carrillo, Ernesto & Carreira, Carlos & Teixeira, Paulino, 2024. "Industrial dynamics in the ICT technological paradigm: The case of Portugal, 1986–2018," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 155-170.
    13. Nobel Prize Committee, 2018. "William D. Nordhaus and Paul M. Romer: Economic Growth, Technological Change, and Climate Change," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2018-2, Nobel Prize Committee.
    14. Maarten De Ridder, 2024. "Market Power and Innovation in the Intangible Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(1), pages 199-251, January.
    15. Gianluca Benigno & Luca Fornaro & Martin Wolf, 2019. "The global financial resource curse," Economics Working Papers 1803, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Aug 2024.
    16. Andrea Guccione & Pau Roldan-Blanco, 2026. "Economic Growth when Knowledge is Concentrated," Working Papers 1562, Barcelona School of Economics.
    17. Stephen J. Terry & Thomas Chaney & Konrad B. Burchardi & Lisa Tarquinio & Tarek A. Hassan, 2026. "Immigration, Innovation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 116(3), pages 828-861, March.
    18. Mr. Roberto Piazza & Yu Zheng, 2019. "Innovate to Lead or Innovate to Prevail: When do Monopolistic Rents Induce Growth?," IMF Working Papers 2019/294, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Lucia Foster & Alex He, 2022. "Correction: Technology and productivity growth," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 120-120, July.
    20. Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2020. "Innovative Growth Accounting," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2020, volume 35, pages 245-295, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:25-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.