IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt3h0721g6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing and Implementing a Panel Study of Commuter Behavior: Lessons for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • Uhlaner, Carole J.
  • Kim, Seyoung

Abstract

We have been collaborating in a panel study of commuter behavior in southern California which has been running since winter 1990. We were interested in setting up a panel so that we could study the dynamics of commuting behavior, especially in a situation where the environment was changing (with, for example, road construction and new Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulations). The present paper focuses upon the design and implementation lessons we have learned from this project, leaving substantive and econometric conclusions for other papers (see, e.g., Brownstone and Chu, 1992; Kim, 1992; and Brownstone and Golob, 1992). The survey instrument involves detailed reporting of the home-work-home trip chain, with summaries of general mobility and alternative choices for a recall period of two weeks. The survey also gathers information on attitudes concerning transportation, perceptions of incentives provided by employers to limit solo driving trips, past experiences with transit and ridesharing, and social, economic, and demographic questions. Since this project was conceptualized as a pilot study, we have engaged in modifications more freely than we might otherwise. The details of the initial instrument design can be found in Golob and Golob (1989). While we did not carry out formal experimentation, we nonetheless believe that some things worked well while others created unforeseen problems. We discuss, first, construction of the sample, second, efforts to deal with attrition, third, modifications of the instrument, fourth, an attempt to obtain contextual measures, and, fifth, accounting and timing problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Uhlaner, Carole J. & Kim, Seyoung, 1993. "Designing and Implementing a Panel Study of Commuter Behavior: Lessons for Future Research," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3h0721g6, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3h0721g6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3h0721g6.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brownstone, David & Golob, Thomas F., 1992. "The effectiveness of ridesharing incentives: Discrete-choice models of commuting in Southern California," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 5-24, March.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Golob, Jacqueline M., 1989. "Practical Considerations in the Development of a Transit Users Panel," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2053v9mz, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Golob, Thomas F. & Golob, Jacqueline M., 1989. "Practical Consideration in the Development of a Transit Users Panel," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt56q060sc, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brownstone, David, 1997. "Multiple Imputation Methodology for Missing Data, Non-Random Response, and Panel Attrition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2zd6w6hh, University of California Transportation Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Pendyala, Ram M. & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1991. "Updating a Panel Survey Questionnaire," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2g93m0gg, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Marlon G. Boarnet & Sharon Sarmiento, 1998. "Can Land-use Policy Really Affect Travel Behaviour? A Study of the Link between Non-work Travel and Land-use Characteristics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(7), pages 1155-1169, June.
    3. Small, Kenneth A. & Yan, Jia, 2001. "The Value of "Value Pricing" of Roads: Second-Best Pricing and Product Differentiation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 310-336, March.
    4. Jun Guan Neoh & Maxwell Chipulu & Alasdair Marshall, 2017. "What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 423-447, March.
    5. Zixuan Peng & Wenxuan Shan & Peng Jia & Bin Yu & Yonglei Jiang & Baozhen Yao, 2020. "Stable ride-sharing matching for the commuters with payment design," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Brown, Anne E., 2020. "Who and where rideshares? Rideshare travel and use in Los Angeles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-134.
    7. Boarnet, Marlon & Crane, Randall, 2001. "The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 823-845, November.
    8. Xiao, Lin & Wu, Jiyan & Sun, Jian & Tian, Ye, 2024. "Money is power: Carpooling stimulus with evidence from an interactive long-term laboratory experiment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 55-70.
    9. Daisik Nam & Jaewoo Cho, 2020. "Deep Neural Network Design for Modeling Individual-Level Travel Mode Choice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Evelyn Blumenberg & Michael Smart, 2010. "Getting by with a little help from my friends…and family: immigrants and carpooling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 429-446, May.
    11. Brownstone, David, 1997. "Multiple Imputation Methodology for Missing Data, Non-Random Response, and Panel Attrition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2zd6w6hh, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Haoran Chen & Xuedong Yan & Xiaobing Liu & Tao Ma, 2023. "Exploring the operational performance discrepancies between online ridesplitting and carpooling transportation modes based on DiDi data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1923-1958, October.
    13. Lambe, Thomas A., 1996. "Driver choice of parking in the city," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 207-219, September.
    14. Sunghi An & Daisik Nam & R. Jayakrishnan & Soongbong Lee & Michael G. McNally, 2021. "A Study of the Factors Affecting Multimodal Ridesharing with Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Pédussel Wu, Jennifer, 2004. "Measuring and explaining levels of regional economic integration," ZEI Working Papers B 12-2004, University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies.
    16. Correia, Gonçalo & Viegas, José Manuel, 2011. "Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 81-90, February.
    17. Khordagui, Nagwa, 2019. "Parking prices and the decision to drive to work: Evidence from California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 479-495.
    18. Shoval, Noam & Kahani, Alon & De Cantis, Stefano & Ferrante, Mauro, 2020. "Impact of incentives on tourist activity in space-time," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Xiaolei Wang & Hai Yang & Daoli Zhu, 2018. "Driver-Rider Cost-Sharing Strategies and Equilibria in a Ridesharing Program," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 868-881, August.
    20. Wu, Jiyan & Tian, Ye & Sun, Jian, 2023. "Managing ridesharing with incentives in a bottleneck model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt3h0721g6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.