IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt1gw166zk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Golob, Thomas F.
  • Regan, Amelia C.

Abstract

Methods developed to study passenger travel behaviour can be usefully applied in studying perceptions, preferences, and behaviour of important actors in freight transportation. Transportation planners throughout the world can benefit by gaining improved understanding of how trucking companies are coping with changes in transportation system levels of service and how companies are likely to react to opportunities presented by information technologies and intelligent transportation systems. In this paper we present five different structural equations models (SEM) that have been estimated using large-scale survey data from the trucking industry. These models are used to examine carrier perceptions related to problems accounting for operational inefficiencies, impacts of traffic congestion on roads and at terminal facilities, transportation policy priorities, and uses of and opportunities for implementing computer and information technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt1gw166zk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1gw166zk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2003. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt74z234n4, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 55-77, March.
    3. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. van Wissen, Leo J. & Golob, Thomas F., 1990. "Simultaneous Equation Systems Involving Binary Choice Variables," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5t28k04n, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Hubbard, Thomas N, 2001. "Contractual Form and Market Thickness in Trucking," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 32(2), pages 369-386, Summer.
    6. van Wissen, Leo J., 1990. "Simultaneous Equation Systems Involving Binary Choice Variables," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt339562gx, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Hamparsum Bozdogan, 1987. "Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 345-370, September.
    8. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Traffic congestion and trucking managers' use of automated routing and scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 61-78, January.
    9. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 577-599, August.
    10. Hall, Randolph W. & Intihar, Chris, 1997. "Commercial Vehicle Operations: Government Interfaces And Intelligent Transportation Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9p272488, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Hirotugu Akaike, 1987. "Factor analysis and AIC," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 317-332, September.
    12. Thomas N. Hubbard, 2000. "The Demand for Monitoring Technologies: The Case of Trucking," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(2), pages 533-560.
    13. Golob, Thomas F. & Reagan, Amelia C., 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A structural Multivariate Discrete Choice Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7kv5f17n, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Hensher, David A. & Golob, Thomas F., 1998. "Searching for Policy Priorities in the Formulation of a Freight Transport Strategy: An Analysis of Freight Industry Attitudes," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt169505dh, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    16. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2000. "Trucking industry perceptions of congestion problems and potential solutions in maritime intermodal operations in California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 587-605, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    3. Regan, A C & Golob, Thomas F, 2000. "CVO Perspectives on the Usefulness of Various Sources of Traffic Information," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0439w6h1, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2001. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7wz0j3rm, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Golob, Thomas F. & Reagan, Amelia C., 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A structural Multivariate Discrete Choice Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7kv5f17n, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Structural Multivariate Probit Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9w1988t7, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt95d8d0xk, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. de Abreu e Silva, João & Alho, André Romano, 2017. "Using Structural Equations Modeling to explore perceived urban freight deliveries parking issues," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 18-32.
    9. Cherry, Christopher R. & Adelakun, Adebola A., 2012. "Truck driver perceptions and preferences: Congestion and conflict, managed lanes, and tolls," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 577-599, August.
    11. Golob, Thomas F., 2011. "Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2pn5j58n, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Golob, Thomas F., 2001. "Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8pb2m1pk, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Preferences for Driver Traveler Information Using Wireless Internet-enabled Devices," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt40q8h6sf, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2003. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt74z234n4, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Maloni, Michael J. & Jackson, Eric C., 2007. "Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    16. Faiq Matin & Gobind M. Herani & Usman Ali Warraich, 2012. "Factors Affecting Traffic Jam in Karachi and its Impact on Performance of Economy," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 5, pages 25-32, December.
    17. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2003. "Safety Aspects of Freeway Weaving Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1zr6p58h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2002. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9q4232hz, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Daniela Andreini & Diego Rinallo & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Mara Bergamaschi, 2017. "Brands and Religion in the Secularized Marketplace and Workplace: Insights from the Case of an Italian Hospital Renamed After a Roman Catholic Pope," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 529-550, March.
    20. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt1gw166zk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.